Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7bV+jL1gKgjr=ndz2gt7qQgvyAsJwt6SefDYvg_6R6zNWGUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7bV+hZTwiquY0GcTA0xVjg2t+QnRt_DcY+XafDJYfa10L7ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHgu=_1DxYjopSX2GRxBbu+syJOD47W92m6+-fBA3PncnbNvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+gRpGLsCU0kULtC+KQbu7b8K7qs_KDSKHWtQzj43w=RpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPm-MtP9Bz0m8zMeMR=feguXnEECs+wMofvOTK1vC1ruJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+gmUSrm3oqfi0Drzk-SWEiAU277KanRNWPzPx+2drRT3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPnyZi9ro=vtvdUgDk1qwcZrnLmChfnjHjOHXDLy1SuDzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+hMRuh1Ah_hh1F6BPneDNZPwDth8MvSTWLtTXLSGaskEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dP=_SDdg-WT=6HwcynNfexHN0Huk0zDV1MAC05-_bWVW6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+hfMSgDtKf4gsS5M5bEthNOsMizHfCGoGEzWaNE0K7vSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPmuW+VY6rB+den_TBRNBzNQH9ctW71dNwh2vDqzxux76w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7bV+jL1gKgjr=ndz2gt7qQgvyAsJwt6SefDYvg_6R6zNWGUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:33:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CACf3dPnuzvH9SEkHaNiJiGacoamKPjzd0aLVvfsc1NQkf7cyFA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] the myth of monoparsing
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba97cc4001bab050e821aeb
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 7 Feb 2015 06:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
    wrote: > > > 2015-02-06 22:53 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
   >> >> If that's true -- I haven't checked (and couldn't because I don't understand
    the Lojban) -- then it's coincidence. > > > Sorry but if you don't understand
    Lojban then ... why all this discussion here? [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [74.125.82.60 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (and.rosta[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders

--047d7ba97cc4001bab050e821aeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 7 Feb 2015 06:24, "Gleki Arxokuna" <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2015-02-06 22:53 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>:
>>
>> If that's true -- I haven't checked (and couldn't because I don't
understand the Lojban) -- then it's coincidence.
>
>
> Sorry but if you don't understand Lojban then ... why all this discussion
here?

I mainly got involved because you seemed not to understand English or
linguistics, and I'd hoped my involvement might serve to enlighten.

> I was trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with another level of
analysing text.
>
> If you can't compare two languages then how can you say what's going on
in Lojban?
>
> It's a must to understand what {lo se xi vei mo'e zo'e nei} means.

It sounds like it would be useful, yes, and perhaps in due course it might
occur to you to offer an explanation of what it means.

But as I said in an earlier message, since Lojban is committed to being
monoparsing, that Lojban sentence will monoparse, and its continuing
relevance is not obvious. You explained why you thought it was the same as
the English example, and I endeavored to explain why everybody else thinks
otherwise.

--And.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7ba97cc4001bab050e821aeb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On 7 Feb 2015 06:24, &quot;Gleki Arxokuna&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gleki=
.is.my.name@gmail.com">gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; 2015-02-06 22:53 GMT+03:00 And Rosta &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:and.rosta@g=
mail.com">and.rosta@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; If that&#39;s true -- I haven&#39;t checked (and couldn&#39;t beca=
use I don&#39;t understand the Lojban) -- then it&#39;s coincidence.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Sorry but if you don&#39;t understand Lojban then ... why all this dis=
cussion here?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I mainly got involved because you seemed not to understand E=
nglish or linguistics, and I&#39;d hoped my involvement might serve to enli=
ghten.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">&gt; I was trying to show how Lojban parsers deal with anoth=
er level of analysing text.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If you can&#39;t compare two languages then how can you say what&#39;s=
 going on in Lojban?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; It&#39;s a must to understand what {lo se xi vei mo&#39;e zo&#39;e nei=
} means.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">It sounds like it would be useful, yes, and perhaps in due c=
ourse it might occur to you to offer an explanation of what it means.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">But as I said in an earlier message, since Lojban is committ=
ed to being monoparsing, that Lojban sentence will monoparse, and its conti=
nuing relevance is not obvious. You explained why you thought it was the sa=
me as the English example, and I endeavored to explain why everybody else t=
hinks otherwise.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">--And.</p>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7ba97cc4001bab050e821aeb--