Received: from mail-lb0-f185.google.com ([209.85.217.185]:52607) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YLy0W-0000vT-GE for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:57:14 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f185.google.com with SMTP id w7sf2742019lbi.2 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=5FjtkOFSR469dJoMGzbU3okVHxqTkggvEeZm0zHr33A=; b=nEcJShKNCExrB8zuGchZznCT10a8rNplsyKUC+IGrlogCExBTEeXStnIetLwE/xbsP 4hMkVFu5JcXIUiNafMneFZtHHLWUy3eJETsYRSB4/Ul31J2Hs0Pko4mfUkf80xkyFfPY wVjVLd9/2GanoFCKZGfzbs3IwSuy9i4kyU/OR6eANddXxNINrQWvu9Nxz0sDbA0toA17 oKhaapP3VSWdvIYjQ5dJjIlE09dXlsaj5P6sHNmy8lgZ+YiNaVxLKZU0Lbvpd9X6aGaI oBJqK8OvVt172ITibATHHfnvNSujvxnbH+WaPDPov7IQSQTJ7+KFRI8dnly9YN0Fa4pZ 7ofA== X-Received: by 10.152.2.6 with SMTP id 6mr78812laq.38.1423763808469; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:48 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.206.65 with SMTP id lm1ls212274lac.38.gmail; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.35.135 with SMTP id h7mr774674lbj.23.1423763807600; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o6si2394389wia.1.2015.02.12.09.56.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hobyrne@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::233; Received: by mail-we0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u56so11686121wes.10 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.101.73 with SMTP id fe9mr8454081wib.15.1423763807437; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.29.234 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:56:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:56:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] the myth of monoparsing From: "Hugh O'Byrne" To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041826b6fc8829050ee7d779 X-Original-Sender: HOByrne@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hobyrne@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c03::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hobyrne@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.2 X-Spam_score_int: 2 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: I have a question, that I might understand your position better. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Since the original post on monoparsing as something unique or defining > feature of Lojban provided no examples on how this monoparsing differs from > English here is once again my full understanding using one example that is > monoparsed both in English and Lojban: > "Fred saw a plane flying over Zurich" can have several meanings: > 1. Attach as a relative clause to the first place: > Fred (who was flying over Zurich) saw a plane. > 2. Attach as a relative clause to the second place: > Fred saw a plane (that was flying over Zurich). > 3. Adverb-like clause (raising, attachment to the first place implied). > Fred saw a plane (while he was) flying over Zurich. > 4. Adverb-like clause (raising, attachment to the second place implied). > Fred saw a plane (while it was) flying over Zurich. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hobyrne[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 2.0 HTML_OBFUSCATE_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML obfuscation 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid --f46d041826b6fc8829050ee7d779 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have a question, that I might understand your position better. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Since the original post on monoparsing as something unique or defining > feature of Lojban provided no examples on how this monoparsing differs from > English here is once again my full understanding using one example that is > monoparsed both in English and Lojban: > "Fred saw a plane flying over Zurich" can have several meanings: > 1. Attach as a relative clause to the first place: > Fred (who was flying over Zurich) saw a plane. > 2. Attach as a relative clause to the second place: > Fred saw a plane (that was flying over Zurich). > 3. Adverb-like clause (raising, attachment to the first place implied). > Fred saw a plane (while he was) flying over Zurich. > 4. Adverb-like clause (raising, attachment to the second place implied). > Fred saw a plane (while it was) flying over Zurich. > I went to the wesite http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-sentence-4.html and typed "Fred saw a plane flying over Zurich", checked "Show all linkages", and clicked "Submit one sentence". The result was: Found 6 linkages (6 with no P.P. violations) Linkage 1, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=0 AND=0 LEN=8) +---O s---+ +-S s-+ +-D s-+---M g---+--MV p-+--J s-+ | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP (NP a plane) (VP flying (PP over (NP Zurich)))))) Linkage 2, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=0 AND=0 LEN=9) +---O s---+ +-----O sn----+ +-S s-+ +-D s-+---M g---+---K --+ | | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP (NP a plane) (VP flying (PRT over) (NP Zurich))))) Linkage 3, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=0 AND=0 LEN=10) +--------P g-------+ +---O s---+ | +-S s-+ +-D s-+ +--MV p-+--J s-+ | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP a plane) (VP flying (PP over (NP Zurich))))) Linkage 4, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=0 AND=0 LEN=11) +--------P g-------+ +---O s---+ +-----O sn----+ +-S s-+ +-D s-+ +---K --+ | | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP a plane) (VP flying (PRT over) (NP Zurich)))) Linkage 5, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=0 AND=0 LEN=11) +-----------MV p----------+ +---O s---+ | +-S s-+ +-D s-+---M g---+ +--J s-+ | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP (NP a plane) (VP flying)) (PP over (NP Zurich)))) Linkage 6, cost vector = (UNUSED=0 DIS=1 AND=0 LEN=9) +---O s---+-------M p------+ +-S s-+ +-D s-+---M g---+ +--J s-+ | | | | | | | Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich Constituent tree: (S (NP Fred) (VP saw (NP (NP (NP a plane) (VP flying)) (PP over (NP Zurich))))) Assertion: "From the sentence "Fred saw a plane flying over Munich", with those words in that order and no parentheses or punctuation, there is more than one parse tree". Question: Do you agree or disagree with that assertion? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d041826b6fc8829050ee7d779 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I ha= ve a question, that I might understand your position better.

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 = at 3:42 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Since the original post on= monoparsing as something unique or defining feature of Lojban provided no = examples on how this monoparsing differs from English here is once again my= full understanding using one example that is monoparsed both in English an= d Lojban:
"Fred saw a plane flying over Zurich" can have seve= ral meanings:
1. Attach as a relative clause to the first place:<= /div>
Fred (who was flying over Zurich) saw a plane.
2. Attac= h as a relative clause to the second place:
Fred saw a plane= (that was flying over Zurich).
3. Adverb-like clause (rais= ing, attachment to the first place implied).
Fred saw a plane (wh= ile he was) flying over Zurich.
4. Adverb-like clause (raisin= g, attachment to the second place implied).
Fred saw a plane (whi= le it was) flying over Zurich.

<= div>I went to the wesite


and typed "Fred= saw a plane flying over Zurich", checked "Show all linkages"= ;, and clicked "Submit one sentence".=C2=A0 The result was:
=

Found 6 linkages (6 wit=
h no P.P. violations)
  Linkage 1, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D0 AND=3D0 LEN=3D8)

       +---=
Os---+                     =20
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+---M=
g---+--MV<=
/a>p-+--Js-+
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP (NP a plane)
           (VP flying
               (PP over
                   (NP Zurich))))))

  Linkage 2, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D0 AND=3D0 LEN=3D9)

       +---=
Os---+        +-----Osn----+
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+---M=
g---+---K--+     |
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP (NP a plane)
           (VP flying
               (PRT over)
               (NP Zurich)))))

  Linkage 3, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D0 AND=3D0 LEN=3D10)

       +--------Pg-------+            =20
       +---=
Os---+        |            =20
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+        +--MVp-+--Js-+
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP a plane)
       (VP flying
           (PP over
               (NP Zurich)))))

  Linkage 4, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D0 AND=3D0 LEN=3D11)

       +--------Pg-------+            =20
       +---=
Os---+        +-----Osn----+
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+        +---K--+     |
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP a plane)
       (VP flying
           (PRT over)
           (NP Zurich))))

  Linkage 5, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D0 AND=3D0 LEN=3D11)

       +-----------MVp----------+     =20
       +---=
Os---+               |     =20
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+---M=
g---+      +--Js-+
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP (NP a plane)
           (VP flying))
       (PP over
           (NP Zurich))))

  Linkage 6, cost vector =3D (UNUSED=3D0 DIS=3D1 AND=3D0 LEN=3D9)

       +---=
Os---+-------Mp------+     =20
  +-Ss-=
+   +-D=
s-+---M=
g---+      +--Js-+
  |    |   |    |        |      |     |
Fred saw.v a plane.n flying.v over Zurich=20

Constituent tree:

(S (NP Fred)
   (VP saw
       (NP (NP (NP a plane)
               (VP flying))
           (PP over
               (NP Zurich)))))

Assertion: &q= uot;From the sentence "Fred saw a plane flying over Munich", with= those words in that order and no parentheses or punctuation, there is more= than one parse tree".=C2=A0 Question: Do you agree or disagree with t= hat assertion?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d041826b6fc8829050ee7d779--