Received: from mail-la0-f64.google.com ([209.85.215.64]:37220) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YV5X6-0005cI-Ok for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:21 -0700 Received: by labgd6 with SMTP id gd6sf5864738lab.4 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=E5IjZs0vE6zGk5cDhpFl0VRg+Tn2VStFvjJDHYHLs4E=; b=xktzmxlTjv71QhdiKWAEN/9RN2M6l4NL4HTz0mF2mJr8+/cPUdC0Xh1zGekPgpuQd/ cAD4fNd83/qHoMlEmQmqWlV2z1JggDeI4FgH4Ld9kCoJ3LEOvEQad8qwAvuh+9y64Bqn ISMsvHMqPFJ3oBZEpfGpL+pWuw2mFRMfSSKYi43ZV3bEV0/rOAXo/tH4tLkEtFlMziep 2Vgip+kASYaoG+ShMw4v9ktzILaN+kbtgCAOBdLjnRI/FqWpgnmRda6Zcl+9o3ktjKAg tc7Ni3ZZLaQurHoVXAogqIEmUeFRb84UHmSRgjYd8P6V3IaYGvzcYFoqXqPgvTEyQhuI WIBg== X-Received: by 10.152.37.38 with SMTP id v6mr342427laj.7.1425937689569; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.179.36 with SMTP id dd4ls374663lac.43.gmail; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.4.229 with SMTP id n5mr4248355lan.1.1425937687075; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bz6si280489wib.3.2015.03.09.14.48.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::236; Received: by mail-wg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x13so28145736wgg.12 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.106.68 with SMTP id gs4mr2766777wib.39.1425937686973; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.86.219 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:48:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <54FD915D.4060607@gmail.com> References: <54FD915D.4060607@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:48:06 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {detri} From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04451a114dd3ce0510e1fd32 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d04451a114dd3ce0510e1fd32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Ilmen wrote: > > > =E2=80=A2 { .i detri fa li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu } > =E2=80=A2 { li pa no pi'e vo no cu tcika fo mi } > > However, does the {detri} sentence actually have the intended meaning? > Isn't {me'o} more appropriate than {li} for expressing dates? > I think dates (and times) are coordinates in a one-dimensional time axis, so I think {li} is right. Coordinates are numbers, not expressions. So for example the expressions "2008-05-25" and "May 25, 2008" both refer to the same date, even though they are different expressions (different me'o, same li). In sentences such as { detri fa li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu }, it > seems that the date expression "2008:5:25" is first evaluated into a pure > number (using some unspecified base), > and then given to detri-x1, in which case detri-x4 seems to become > completely useless, as it cannot be applied to any numeric expression (as > all is given to it as input is a pure number). { detri fa li re no no bi > pi'e mu pi'e re mu fo ko'a } would then be about as meaningful as { li ze > no no no no no cu detri fo ko'a }. > I take detri4 (or detri3 rather, since I take detri to have only three places) as the reference frame, not a place to indicate how to read the expression used to refer to the detri1. Basically it should tell you what the origin and the units are. How to read the li-expression is something that one must already know. Just as one knows that in "li pa no" the first digit is for tens and the second for units, one should know that in "li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu" the digits show year-month-day. If you are using some non-standard or not well-known notation to refer to a date, you would have to explain it, but basically in the same way you would have to explain any non-standard expression you use to refer to anything else. I think we need to keep the date separate from the words used to refer to it. detri1 is the date, not the words used to refer to it. You could use a different expression like "la'o gy May 25, 2008 gy" to refer to the same date that "li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re no" refers to. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d04451a114dd3ce0510e1fd32 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:

=E2=80=A2 { .i detri fa li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu }
=E2=80=A2 { li pa no pi'e vo no cu tcika fo mi }

However, does the {detri} sentence actually have the intended meaning? Isn't {me'o} more appropriate than {li} for expressing dates?

I think dates (and tim= es) are coordinates in a one-dimensional time axis, so I think {li} is righ= t. Coordinates are numbers, not expressions. So for example the expressions= "2008-05-25" and "May 25, 2008" both refer to the same= date, even though they are different expressions (different me'o, same= li).

In sentences such as { detri fa li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re = mu }, it seems that the date expression "2008:5:25" is first evalua= ted into a pure number (using some unspecified base),=C2=A0
and then give= n to detri-x1, in which case detri-x4 seems to become completely useless, as it cannot be applied to any numeric expression (as all is given to it as input is a pure number). { detri fa li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu fo ko'a } would then be about as meaningful as { li = ze no no no no no cu detri fo ko'a }.

I take detri4 (or detri3 rather, since I take detri to have only thr= ee places) as the reference frame, not a place to indicate how to read the = expression used to refer to the detri1. Basically it should tell you what t= he origin and the units are. How to read the li-expression is something tha= t one must already know. Just as one knows that in "li pa no" the= first digit is for tens and the second for units, one should know that in = "li re no no bi pi'e mu pi'e re mu" the digits show year-= month-day. If you are using some non-standard or not well-known notation to= refer to a date, you would have to explain it, but basically in the same w= ay you would have to explain any non-standard expression you use to refer t= o anything else. I think we need to keep the date separate from the words u= sed to refer to it. detri1 is the date, not the words used to refer to it. = You could use a different expression like "la'o gy May 25, 2008 gy= " to refer to the same date that "li re no no bi pi'e mu pi&#= 39;e re no" refers to.

mu'o mi'e = xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d04451a114dd3ce0510e1fd32--