Received: from mail-qg0-f63.google.com ([209.85.192.63]:33858) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YqhmS-0002Zw-KG for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 05:53:36 -0700 Received: by qgaj5 with SMTP id j5sf18638171qga.1 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 05:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=muE/O2emxEPqF3Ej4BSfz/7J9ZPcYKAxxF9o+s1cLnE=; b=kWsGCCTj8Bi4ueHN6sAqOE9ObDW1Lk2xSCKUH4RK9x1mFulnFtSwsfAQ5PGKTTuLld eOCz8kjwFg+Y27BAm5OosDZG2VJ+AYwqmN5YxFSbMB33NUwKFh6gL1DygHQhFZ3r9+mx mpi6RWzdgaLtOGx//0+BHOtyrFzp2WnzWwv/DbAiRvciGy6peVRxPf1db/H4eFSNCXbB wHAOCaOap/0Dx3HnG773CCC9NZ4rXP+siX4O0bRSv7GDq+ZeCXGSI6wKHdrn+P3iLr+A cBeEYxwBI4s812xdDvcR6KVE+d4JvjY/WI9SVVunwg9f+Xuuburd4rMLMFWx+rCUnnBy qswA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=muE/O2emxEPqF3Ej4BSfz/7J9ZPcYKAxxF9o+s1cLnE=; b=rx2s7Renix3aZ4fTEyOmM8MtQ9vk6GhSAjO5WZCm2PfMjp/v8nx3c0HnDtYnmPb+cj p5qj4CL/eFh5njlY+TYb05Mq9Wv0fyu31KJDjhwNM5lFBqsqFvws9miT1HZDPqyPuyln sdP9omZ/CuFoyD4ATWuBf/x1pxAbsRkwONTCZyhF/3PaV1vpa2Kmo12Jt1LdgcA+8q0Q 8f51e/DQQLZocc3DmzSRTAsZRWkZ/6WDE8MO81c2jXOhIIeRPZgZvrnSS5otbN86qjcz BF9+f2ONBuZdedFyHh4YvH3Dhp/DHRDwC0yQ6ZiKMSf6DJZhSTQcUOegY1J4tqcK2hVb JlYA== X-Received: by 10.50.61.231 with SMTP id t7mr68975igr.14.1431089602446; Fri, 08 May 2015 05:53:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.23.82 with SMTP id k18ls279348igf.18.gmail; Fri, 08 May 2015 05:53:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.1.43 with SMTP id 11mr68819igj.8.1431089602085; Fri, 08 May 2015 05:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 05:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Spheniscine To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <6af25e33-7de5-4b0d-abf6-72192aafdb48@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <494619f2-d28a-4893-a7c2-14c6d78f817c@googlegroups.com> References: <494619f2-d28a-4893-a7c2-14c6d78f817c@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: It's been a long time. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2255_1045334874.1431089601083" X-Original-Sender: spheniscine@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_2255_1045334874.1431089601083 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2256_379511211.1431089601083" ------=_Part_2256_379511211.1431089601083 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Actually Pater Noster is clearly {mi'a}, since the "our" clearly doesn't include the addressee (God/the Father). Similarly with "give us this day our daily bread". On Friday, May 8, 2015 at 5:33:54 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine wrote: > > coi za'u re'u loi jbotadni > > Wow, the memories are flooding back. I was part of that old mailing list > waaay back when. Checking my email archive it was... 2008? Heh. In that > time I had discovered much about myself I didn't know about before, found > some new hobbies. > > Well, a conversation about philology and linguistics, both natural and > constructed, had suddenly reminded me of Lojban; I thought I'd take a peek > a what happened when I was gone... and... wow. You guys have really gone up > and remodeled the place. "Dot side", the "xorlo" reform, new *cmavo* like > *mi'ai*, *la'oi*, etc. (I might still need some of these explained to > me), rewriting the language primer... not to mention ongoing talk about > reducing logical connectives to a single set, and even possible abolishment > of the short *rafsi* system... I was even surprised at little things like > the deprecation of *tirxu* in favor of *tigra*. After I got over the > initial shock though, I found myself agreeing with pretty much all these > changes. > > I was never very fluent at Lojban, and I'm not sure how much time I have > to dedicate to that goal now. But even through all these changes, which I > quite appreciate for "cleaning up" a lot of clutter, including stuff I > didn't realize *was* clutter, I still see the elements that attracted me > in the first place; the idea of a language with both syntactic and semantic > rigor as core ideals, that challenged assumptions about what language could > be like. > > (Yes, I'm aware that this rigor takes different forms on both cases. The > syntactic rigor of Lojban eliminates syntactic ambiguity if used correctly, > but eliminating semantic ambiguity is impossible without specifying and > tense-marking everything to oblivion. However, semantic *rigor*, though > not perfect [see the ongoing discussion about *tarci* "star (celestial > object)" versus "star (shape)"], means that each word represents one > specific Platonic idea/relation, in contrast to English (and other natural > languages), where words typically have {Platonic idea/relation + > connotational baggage + figurative senses + other Platonic ideas/relations > that may have had some tangential relationship with the original idea and > figurative senses long ago + unrelated ideas from a completely different > word that merged into this word}... as an amateur philologist this can be > quite beautiful in its own right. But I also very much liked the idea of a > language where one could "say what they mean and mean what they say".) > > Anyway, glad to be reacquainted. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_2256_379511211.1431089601083 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually Pater Noster is clearly {mi'a}, since the "our" c= learly doesn't include the addressee (God/the Father). Similarly with "give= us this day our daily bread".

On Friday, May 8, 2015 at 5:33:54 PM = UTC+8, Spheniscine wrote:
coi za'u re'u loi jbotadni

Wow, the memories= are flooding back. I was part of that old mailing list waaay back when. Ch= ecking my email archive it was... 2008? Heh. In that time I had discovered = much about myself I didn't know about before, found some new hobbies.
=

Well, a conversation about philology and linguistics, b= oth natural and constructed, had suddenly reminded me of Lojban; I thought = I'd take a peek a what happened when I was gone... and... wow. You guys hav= e really gone up and remodeled the place. "Dot side", the "xorlo" reform, n= ew cmavo like mi'ai, la'oi, etc. (I might still n= eed some of these explained to me), rewriting the language primer... not to= mention ongoing talk about reducing logical connectives to a single set, a= nd even possible abolishment of the short rafsi system... I was even= surprised at little things like the deprecation of tirxu in fa= vor of tigra. After I got over the initial shock though, I found mys= elf agreeing with pretty much all these changes.

I= was never very fluent at Lojban, and I'm not sure how much time I have to = dedicate to that goal now. But even through all these changes, which I quit= e appreciate for "cleaning up" a lot of clutter, including stuff I didn't r= ealize was clutter, I still see the elements that attracted me in th= e first place; the idea of a language with both syntactic and semantic rigo= r as core ideals, that challenged assumptions about what language could be = like. 

(Yes, I'm aware that this rigor takes = different forms on both cases. The syntactic rigor of Lojban eliminates syn= tactic ambiguity if used correctly, but eliminating semantic ambiguity is i= mpossible without specifying and tense-marking everything to oblivion. Howe= ver, semantic rigor, though not perfect [see the ongoing discussion = about tarci "star (celestial object)" versus "star (shape)"], m= eans that each word represents one specific Platonic idea/relation, in cont= rast to English (and other natural languages), where words typically have {= Platonic idea/relation + connotational baggage + figurative senses + other = Platonic ideas/relations that may have had some tangential relationship wit= h the original idea and figurative senses long ago + unrelated ideas from a= completely different word that merged into this word}... as an amateur phi= lologist this can be quite beautiful in its own right. But I also very much= liked the idea of a language where one could "say what they mean and mean = what they say".)

Anyway, glad to be reacquainted.<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_2256_379511211.1431089601083-- ------=_Part_2255_1045334874.1431089601083--