Received: from mail-wi0-f185.google.com ([209.85.212.185]:34167) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqjm3-0005oB-UK for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:16 -0700 Received: by wivr20 with SMTP id r20sf9953582wiv.1 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7F5xLPGP5y5iXrupAfMKtznzRZ7PXbJi0pXmTtRCcHM=; b=f1//FazQjjRo+MzSA882vkYe3IGvXxz8VO9LZuE2gUNR5L+2KNtMgxgjrwkDQPsoF6 jBIV3ruVJajYnnJhHyS2KFJ7yQ4+KeXXcMo6EgIO8MzBoYAEN72Xi9gYbgTT6+1fhFv2 1wHExdkQKR6bEml3lv6Y2kHbqxEj3LhNjW3RgGF+cV0qCf/GkwMpJoA0cehLjUoa1xi4 My4ngZFYwXl8+Vr/mVumKJEQLKcCEuTS/X79oiEn7/66I6llP1dMz4jTpQP1w3Uo/xDV urrvAtvhe6SaIAdPJkm71brGL/zI9M18Ijh30FlgeWA/TaJynTOE3Z4pSDXYwHkUnRWv wbrw== X-Received: by 10.152.229.133 with SMTP id sq5mr66035lac.24.1431097265013; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.207.65 with SMTP id lu1ls335723lac.104.gmail; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.189.131 with SMTP id gi3mr2264766lbc.6.1431097264543; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p9si441729wiz.3.2015.05.08.08.01.04 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236; Received: by mail-wi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f7so38618038wie.0 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.13.198 with SMTP id fa6mr7051237wid.41.1431097264368; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Fri, 8 May 2015 08:00:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150508143112.GA2051@kuebelreiter.informatik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE> References: <494619f2-d28a-4893-a7c2-14c6d78f817c@googlegroups.com> <6af25e33-7de5-4b0d-abf6-72192aafdb48@googlegroups.com> <20150508143112.GA2051@kuebelreiter.informatik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:00:43 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: It's been a long time. To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d648914f2360515934ce4 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d043d648914f2360515934ce4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-05-08 17:31 GMT+03:00 v4hn : > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0300, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > 2015-05-08 15:53 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine : > > > Actually Pater Noster is clearly {mi'a}, since the "our" clearly > doesn't > > > include the addressee (God/the Father). > > > > Who knows, maybe Father is the father of himself. > > I'm not a Christian, but is that even a *possible* interpretation? > It sounds ridiculous to me. > Sorry, I'm not an expert. Some say other religions are ridiculous. Translation can be very important. You wouldn't complaint that 3=1, would you? Is that more ridiculous? > > > Also {ma'a} is possible like e.g. Father not only of Christians but even > > those who don't believe in Him. > > [...] > > {mi'a} would mean here something completely different and for some it may > > sound egoistic. > > Sorry, you lost me. Why wouldn't {mi'a} include others? > The addressee is clearly the Father, not heathens. > Both {mi'a} and {ma'a} include "& others unspecified" in their definition. > Oops, indeed, my mistake. It should be {mi} (which is also "we") vs. {mi'a}. > > > v4hn > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d043d648914f2360515934ce4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-05-08 17:31 GMT+03:00 v4hn <me@v4hn.de>:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0300,= Gleki Arxokuna wrote:
> 2015-05-08 15:53 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine <spheniscine@gmail.com>:
> > Actually Pater Noster is clearly {mi'a}, since the "our&= quot; clearly doesn't
> > include the addressee (God/the Father).
>
> Who knows, maybe Father is the father of himself.

I'm not a Christian, but is that even a *possible* interpretatio= n?
It sounds ridiculous to me.

Sorry, I= 9;m not an expert. Some say other religions are ridiculous. Translation can= be very important. You wouldn't complaint that 3=3D1, would you? Is th= at more ridiculous?

> Also {ma'a} is possible like e.g. Father not only of Christians bu= t even
> those who don't believe in Him.
> [...]
> {mi'a} would mean here something completely diffe= rent and for some it may
> sound egoistic.

Sorry, you lost me. Why wouldn't {mi'a} include others?
The addressee is clearly the Father, not heathens.
Both {mi'a} and {ma'a} include "& others unspecified"= in their definition.


Oo= ps, indeed, my mistake. It should be {mi} (which is also "we") vs= . {mi'a}.
=C2=A0


v4hn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+uns= ubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d043d648914f2360515934ce4--