Received: from mail-vn0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:34382) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YrLIK-0002zZ-EL for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:05:01 -0700 Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62sf28411621vnb.1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=plMrYY2KDSUhQTG18lKxGE7CpUXpK73rloWFyEuQvLs=; b=pHuiW0g+ModmLfSB+EnI9RkddUUKRLHBlVAwWHY9SThS+rLzyjJ4laFPXN8T36Ig03 vIFss+gNs8OoavU/2o2DVJoSHBWeObjVh85OtEiNddtYIz7Mh4RFYo6vcF3miJH7GNXI XhY+NelsliTx20bmOk/a8PDpTC6y2spe/0eT7fiN75RA2S3AMlFW52fZDhhDX0RGsCoK 5YJ6loLSSvTMyU0bOC1KmNZSln9GDeMG7Uyr8GF9X7cM0y/2snjdv6e+3tm2oj+AibBx r7feRi72aU9ryhPJiiN1Jhkcp1TuCdMrDDzTsYj44ojwjbriitBMzToqFeMUNgYL0wtb 5CAQ== X-Received: by 10.182.81.234 with SMTP id d10mr29212oby.5.1431241494410; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.241.161 with SMTP id wj1ls738767obc.51.gmail; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.105.230 with SMTP id gp6mr9998957obb.7.1431241494091; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qr9si284114igb.0.2015.05.10.00.04.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f; Received: by mail-ig0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id hj9so49543115igb.1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.28.146 with SMTP id c140mr6642247ioc.67.1431241493948; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.18.135 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2c247ae2-1e2b-446f-906e-d48a75271b77@googlegroups.com> References: <2c247ae2-1e2b-446f-906e-d48a75271b77@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] New metalinguistic term since the cmevla-brivla merge? From: Remo Dentato To: lojban Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114093bed5b2da0515b4e0a4 X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - --001a114093bed5b2da0515b4e0a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 My understanding is that "merging" cmevla and brivla was rejected on the basis that it would have broken a significant part of the grammar. {la lojban mo}, would no longer mean "what is lojban" (or similar). The way to transform a cmevla into a brivla is by using {me la} ( {lo mela diplodocus cu barda} ) Did I miss the merge and the necessary changes to the grammar? On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Spheniscine wrote: > If the cmevla and brivla have been syntactically merged, as implemented by > the ilmentufa-parser, I believe the terms must now be redefined. > > {cmevla} could remain as is; they still end in a consonant, have mandatory > pauses before and after, and are primarily used for names. > > As for {brivla}, I believe {lo cmevla ca brivla}. What is used to be known > as "Stage 2 fu'ivla" can now be just cmevla; for example, I could say: > > {ti .fetutcinis.} (This is fettucine), or {mi citka lo .fetutcinis.} (I > eat some fettucine) > > In those examples, the cmevla have been divorced from their usual role of > "proper nouns", and are basically used the same way a gismu, lujvo, or a > zi'evla would. Additionally, they're dead easy to use; any beginner who's > been taught how to reformat their name into a cmevla can use tthese. > > Of course, like stage-2 fu'ivla before it, this is meant to be only a > temporary measure; there are two good reasons to "naturalize" any useful > concepts into a lujvo or zi'evla: > > 1. Avoidance of the mandatory pauses; too many cmevla in text will > inhibit natural reading. > 2. The possibility of rigorous definition in resources like jbovlaste, > with defined place values; as per the goals of Lojban, each {na'e cmevla > brivla} should represent one single concept, and polysemy avoided. > > And... yeah. So now we just had a demonstration of the problem: we need a > new word for {na'e cmevla brivla}, which differs from {cmevla} both in > morphology and in having a rigorously defined place structure. It is the > union of the sets {gismu}, {lujvo}, and {zi'evla}. What should it be? > > {kauvla}? {mulvla}? {rarvla}? Or something else entirely? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a114093bed5b2da0515b4e0a4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My understanding is that "merging= " cmevla and brivla was rejected on the basis that it would have broke= n a significant part of the grammar.

{la lojban mo}, would no= longer mean "what is lojban" (or similar).

The way = to transform a cmevla into a brivla is by using {me la} ( {lo mela diplodoc= us cu barda} )

Did I miss the merge and the necessary changes = to the grammar?



On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Spheniscine <sp= heniscine@gmail.com> wrote:
If the cmevla and brivla have been syntactically merged, = as implemented by the ilmentufa-parser, I believe the terms must now be red= efined.

{cmevla} could remain as is; they still end in a= consonant, have mandatory pauses before and after, and are primarily used = for names.

As for {brivla}, I believe {lo cmevla c= a brivla}. What is used to be known as "Stage 2 fu'ivla" can = now be just cmevla; for example, I could say:

{ti = .fetutcinis.} (This is fettucine), or {mi citka lo .fetutcinis.} (I eat som= e fettucine)

In those examples, the cmevla have be= en divorced from their usual role of "proper nouns", and are basi= cally used the same way a gismu, lujvo, or a zi'evla would. Additionall= y, they're dead easy to use; any beginner who's been taught how to = reformat their name into a cmevla can use tthese.

= Of course, like stage-2 fu'ivla before it, this is meant to be only a t= emporary measure; there are two good reasons to "naturalize" any = useful concepts into a lujvo or zi'evla:
  1. Avoidance of the mandatory pauses; too many cmevla = in text will inhibit natural reading.
  2. The possibility of rigorous definition in resources like jbovl= aste, with defined place values; as per the goals of Lojban, each {na'e= cmevla brivla} should represent one single concept, and polysemy avoided.<= /span>
And... yeah. So now we just had a demonstration of the= problem: we need a new word for {na'e cmevla brivla}, which differs fr= om {cmevla} both in morphology and in having a rigorously defined place str= ucture. It is the union of the sets {gismu}, {lujvo}, and {zi'evla}. Wh= at should it be?

{kauvla}? {mulvla}? {rarvla= }? Or something else entirely?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a114093bed5b2da0515b4e0a4--