Received: from mail-pd0-f190.google.com ([209.85.192.190]:34348) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YrQqO-0005I8-Uc for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:34 -0700 Received: by pdev10 with SMTP id v10sf29344689pde.1 for ; Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=3+UhgiVp/wN+qYc/0yfgYUCzC4Wa2w+0KnY3crNldhY=; b=U9wvve5nVx//HnWhkiy8pESE84Z3VWvFezccDYo1wQrvyIUgaVqULk0hxBPWSct2Yc tkELFHGiPMRzvAQ0fR2BTqtxx87Bh1AWWPS1TrhHF8Oe5pfI/clwEhSgyWoIZPl4jC98 V3HflFWWSrzYbUfuzDC0JOZ94I6ywTrjVDpZH0/vG0ruM7+zpAWfabunCxzekWSzOkxc Ifa8bkU257l/SjaLSAEomtULpp7vkYWoKbr9nlKdifpOrv3gKjVuO7z4WQShlvdA/Vl3 A3uj7sSQR5h3TBvqJDe4ulHYT5TzZlMOdVmIUGrjCJ8L8ZEwI5LyT/+dg5jQDkkt3dCT teTg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=3+UhgiVp/wN+qYc/0yfgYUCzC4Wa2w+0KnY3crNldhY=; b=q/UCr5q6DEse1kcQu5MoaUZVHwNvF2VSn76oNJNYUlNq6g4peK4zuvwDD1hxLopm8u 0KiBGbUwyr8LA6nmmLqJT+2lgFas2MzjEovxFEknzTFp/ylcnQiv3P+2a+ap1rHFqAQE YQEcEvkAm/pf4XyUeIHTJ6AjZJK1aYMohAsMJxNdyIbEI7PETIi920YZ6xt/fCbYpKE1 CNWionLQmbQoyWZAXwoYEDtkFIiHMgagR1Bclo7+ncZayeXVv4Ei2ow35Zhr2Yg77O5f IaN22trvar7TE3FLozuWocG8HFl0aoYp/ACq2YejtFM94VFtdslJOexbQTSURchBSfmQ udKQ== X-Received: by 10.50.25.199 with SMTP id e7mr131724igg.16.1431262826753; Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.156.143 with SMTP id f137ls1330069ioe.60.gmail; Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.79.130 with SMTP id j2mr110009igx.13.1431262826425; Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 06:00:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Spheniscine To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <4183774c-dee7-412d-80fc-a22fd8c9cc7b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> References: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Proposal for new cmavo: {vau'u} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_510_1449085883.1431262824983" X-Original-Sender: spheniscine@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_510_1449085883.1431262824983 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_511_174394954.1431262824983" ------=_Part_511_174394954.1431262824983 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Actually, instead of pretending to be a string of {vau}, perhaps it'd be better just for it to auto-close with all famyma'o that a simple {.i} would (but without actually starting a new sentence). This way it can even close off sentences that do not actually have bridi (and thus no possible {vau}); for example {coi lo tavla pe la .lojban. vau'u ui}. Will probably be easier to code too. On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine wrote: > > I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which is in its > own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; acting as any > number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence. > > Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an > afterthought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last > thing in it. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi > vau ui}), but more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require > several {vau}, which just feels wrong. For example > > Instead of: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} > You can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui} > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_511_174394954.1431262824983 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Actually, instead of pretending to be a string of {vau}, p= erhaps it'd be better just for it to auto-close with all famyma'o that a si= mple {.i} would (but without actually starting a new sentence). This way it= can even close off sentences that do not actually have bridi (and thus no = possible {vau}); for example {coi lo tavla pe la .lojban. vau'u ui}. Will p= robably be easier to code too.

On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 P= M UTC+8, Spheniscine wrote:
I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, whic= h is in its own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; ac= ting as any number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence.

=
Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an aftert= hought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last thing in i= t. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi vau ui}), bu= t more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require several {va= u}, which just feels wrong. For example

Instead of= : {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} 
Y= ou can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui}

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_511_174394954.1431262824983-- ------=_Part_510_1449085883.1431262824983--