Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:33754) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YrjB6-0007HB-5S for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:12 -0700 Received: by wibbw19 with SMTP id bw19sf25091579wib.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=B2sLtUk4sFKlpdsjPf0/KYEl748USgvAdFsKeF7EPZg=; b=SOWJAhz/sydkrufrCjwwzSE0SCoIyXrMqi/fkDo124MqLBILyx3/4awu3X6UpplQEJ Ejx3prKaSDu3Bbz7ZlItjQ+VNhbij/fcJogzphvn/tQ41Svtxxh31dL2o5pPimNWXeqo dHHNapzKAmVJrsXS9f2+M9GbJjUMvaqnRYH3E2vPWZbwyRWgOwhW4trkftEnHpURNwjm JHvlHslyCSGHruzJ5BUeqLTzSrDb63Fr8u7ar5IhNf0VFUHYQo3MKqARJKQMQQR8XLIH gTHm/udHIZAg/IADtEtuvmuB8hUSTn8UqBxNr3M9eo9MIUobSs3xtBBFhiUuk3p2Q1Gr Spfw== X-Received: by 10.152.88.97 with SMTP id bf1mr92673lab.3.1431333301304; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.203.194 with SMTP id ks2ls614947lac.10.gmail; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.142.170 with SMTP id rx10mr6916452lbb.12.1431333300606; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2si370308wif.0.2015.05.11.01.35.00 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e; Received: by mail-wg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c8so94076542wgi.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.205.225 with SMTP id lj1mr18210365wjc.138.1431333300475; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2015 01:34:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <65536ce4-fed6-4355-88f7-90908d8d11e7@googlegroups.com> References: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> <65536ce4-fed6-4355-88f7-90908d8d11e7@googlegroups.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:34:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal for new cmavo: {vau'u} To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6b9e4ee1de90515ca405f X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7bd6b9e4ee1de90515ca405f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-05-11 10:54 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) : > I'm actually kinda wondering if we would be willing to use our last > monosyllabic cmavo, {xau}, for this. > Before that it was proposed for: * a synonym of a useful preposition {seva'u} otherwise known as a "beneficiary case tag" * a generalized question word creating a question out of lo sumti, lo sumka'i and lo cnima'o e.g. {zo'e xau} = {ma} {co'e xau} = {mo} I actually turn out to use it quite often for afterthought attitudinal, due > to its relative freedom of context. No need to worry about whether {vau} is > sufficient or even possible {xau a'inai}. That extra syllable might make > the difference for how well it is accepted among beginners, who often > mistakenly attach attitudinals to the last word of a sentence. > > While we're at it I've had a look at the other xVV cmavo. {xai} seems fine > and usable. > Where is {xai} used? I can't remember any live usage except a bunch of sentences in Tatoeba. > {xei} doesn't see much use, but {rei} really needs a replacement, and > making it multisyllabic would break the pattern. > > But {zo xoi ki'a sai}? Can't make sense of the definition, and I can't see > how it is useful. > This {xoi} is similar to {sei} but converts clauses (lo bridi) not to attitudinals/text comments but to adverbs/prepositions like {fi'o} does but with a different grammar. > > On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) wrote: >> >> I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which is in its >> own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; acting as any >> number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence. >> >> Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an >> afterthought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last >> thing in it. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi >> vau ui}), but more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require >> several {vau}, which just feels wrong. For example >> >> Instead of: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} >> You can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui} >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7bd6b9e4ee1de90515ca405f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-05-11 10:54 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) &l= t;spheniscine@gm= ail.com>:
= I'm actually kinda wondering if we wou= ld be willing to use our last monosyllabic cmavo, {xau}, for this.

Before that it was proposed for:
=
* a synonym of a useful preposition {seva'u} otherwise known as a = "beneficiary case tag"
* a generalized question word cr= eating a question out of lo sumti, lo sumka'i and lo cnima'o e.g.

{zo'e xau} =3D {ma}
{co'e xau} = =3D {mo}

I actually turn out to use it quite ofte= n for afterthought attitudinal, due to its relative freedom of context. No = need to worry about whether {vau} is sufficient or even possible {xau a'= ;inai}. That extra syllable might make the difference for how well it is ac= cepted among beginners, who often mistakenly attach attitudinals to the las= t word of a sentence.

While we're at it I've had a look at the other xVV cmavo. {x= ai} seems fine and usable.

Where is {xai} used? I can't remember any live usage except a bunch o= f sentences in Tatoeba.
=C2=A0
{xei} doesn't see much use, but {rei} rea= lly needs a replacement, and making it multisyllabic would break the patter= n.

But {zo xoi ki'a sai}? Can't make sense= of the definition, and I can't see how it is useful.
=

This {xoi} is similar to {sei} but convert= s clauses (lo bridi) not to attitudinals/text comments but to adverbs/prepo= sitions like {fi'o} does but with a different grammar.



On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine = (la zipcpi) wrote:
= I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which is in it= s own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau&q= uot;; acting as any number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence.
Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals = as an afterthought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the las= t thing in it. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi = vau ui}), but more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require= several {vau}, which just feels wrong. For example

Instead of: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui}=C2=A0=
You can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u = ui}

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7bd6b9e4ee1de90515ca405f--