Received: from mail-vn0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:33336) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YrlX1-0002wP-I8 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:06:39 -0700 Received: by vnbg62 with SMTP id g62sf32837090vnb.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:05:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x_cmae_category:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=0dylUK3fNP07uT49asyko53F9kv6opc9TJeMGp9xHDU=; b=PdD2ehzy9gdfM13NJDWtA4Bu+8tzuaRsVpYNFpxPDljAVCT0YJnwDAL1VP0fC0YBGk d+dY3cJsa5hXWBBzS1ywDbMxOrYgq3ET/Vke/Q0Ou5gmrjHYy4KhYmTnLG3154xs5rBy HdOll2VAKwczb2uNd8+kVCanCduRMNFnYk3aRmsn5CBbADKVmJ5sHChTMEW5+MyFYPkj JpqVQkjdSTQFDDsyNTwNc3ay1OwYQ31RoBswClH7lDKvvH7V2vDlurYrB9jJlz95TRLg KxAgADwbMfFJIHJX4LTGnqqZeibDCmp0TcJTbkwUfJrra2Bj7HDLbODO2m/7CjlSMYiX wZoQ== X-Received: by 10.50.107.105 with SMTP id hb9mr176186igb.3.1431342349535; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:05:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.6.86 with SMTP id 83ls1582677iog.10.gmail; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:05:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.67.3.197 with SMTP id by5mr17361315pad.2.1431342349322; Mon, 11 May 2015 04:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.hughes.net (smtp.hughes.net. [69.168.97.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g4si583882igc.3.2015.05.11.04.05.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 04:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=69.168.97.48; X-Authed-Username: cGhtYUBodWdoZXMubmV0 X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=ZujUdbLG c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:117 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=B1-hNj924W8A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=h1PgugrvaO0A:10 a=GApJ_1hDWZYW4vZpJasA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 45.37.90.97 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org) Received: from [45.37.90.97] ([45.37.90.97:52095] helo=bezitopo.org) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 7C/29-08210-C0D80555; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:05:48 -0400 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D6819DF for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:05:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o Documentation (or, rewriting the CLL?) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 07:05:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1480405.c4t1cMQITN@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-49-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <6fa4fb48-8814-416f-b1fb-f25e2dcc75dc@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - On Sunday, May 10, 2015 22:12:31 Spheniscine wrote: > I think the thing with the CLL is that it's often not so much *wrong* und= er > the new proposals (although the cmevla-brivla merge would cause its > subtitle *.i la .lojban. mo* to be incorrect) as that there is a lot of > clutter; a lot of things that are made much easier by new developments. > Like the whole thing about the four stages of fu'ivla: Stage one is now > best done using *la'oi* or *me'oi*. Stage two, under the cmevla-brivla > merge, would be just a bare cmevla. Stage three can be dropped altogether= ; > they were long and difficult to pronounce and no one liked them anyway. A= nd > stage four is when you make it a zi'evla: a word that didn't exist at the > time of the CLL, and got confused with the term fu'ivla that should > properly just mean loan word ("copy-word") and not say anything about > morphology. Stage 3 should not be dropped. I prefer stage 4, but sometimes it's=20 impossible. For instance, there's a bovid called =D7=AA=D7=90=D7=95 in Hebr= ew (Deut. 14:5; in=20 modern Hebrew it's a buffalo and RV agrees, but NVI and NIV say antelope). = The=20 glottal stop doesn't count as a consonant in Lojban, so it has only one=20 consonant. A brivla must have at least two consonants. So the Lojban word i= s a=20 type-3, {bakrto}. On Sunday, May 10, 2015 22:57:58 Spheniscine wrote: > OK, an *important question:* Are there any copyright or license > restrictions in the use of the CLL? Can we just start copying pages from = it > wholesale into the Wiki, and begin making adjustments to it for readabili= ty > and currentness? The CLL being worked on is in a Git repository. If you want to edit it, clo= ne=20 the repo or ask permissions to commit to it. Pierre --=20 ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.