Received: from mail-qg0-f58.google.com ([209.85.192.58]:33625) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrmu0-0005BY-KY for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:53 -0700 Received: by qgdz60 with SMTP id z60sf33473725qgd.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=KT9PLfc275sak3RZvaPc85MlRh9GteneYqP67CVGM9k=; b=Q/+YFO1sd3Q/SY+XtlAY+qMP9Md/H9iq1Ob0P754iU0WD3Z22AkwfvVONZ7O1Ir4VX 529I05LcAAPdai+zoApCdphZJ+txddW8Ej5/Nv1VMrvnX+bWk4sdBNwfVq6v+o2zz7km EseRbx0EXAdcyWNnRPbCLlr5FOIkMJqkpkQZEOAYFhgVDsf+vUr3H9t9qTwKA+u+A65I /NpGbDONO6mbWqdYyZOCwYhH7CoqiNXyjtOgpcnk4xktC7SixCWcFre3gyH93zLZkioi LGxkq/pzDLkR/7z7AcPRfbtfu/x1pA8ebO5nD1hjaUD10k90syvdtOAus/bzJtDfiatL aNaA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=KT9PLfc275sak3RZvaPc85MlRh9GteneYqP67CVGM9k=; b=A8OloKnEOYWPS1Mzm848EK2/+KcYd2I0uSpcfpPtOvy7DHACRFIl1CEHJAb6kaX/F5 vNxAQ/Z7jsx+7cCEJ+RU7kMEwAi7IRtBOUk739Cg6fniuaFkQKUhNhmM0tFCH5CxqQFj T99MA1jpjmkjck3TC2NOFNTOycp+ZEVXR3m1py71nsQ2wXXk8xhMa1B9IjAsDCO10Mwi CeJCm9q4HCOV1X5FeGFvREt2aTs+GLc9okSLpUX762W8GYEUsD6GSR80emeXmg0qeWoP 2TQ4PLyavr4o1k2RHWmEHCOQTQRFVi4GXRmYhPtxFki+Rq93Dzj/tD3XwR5RZU0Tpy/X M4Iw== X-Received: by 10.50.152.102 with SMTP id ux6mr168008igb.0.1431347618466; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.128.232 with SMTP id nr8ls881642igb.2.gmail; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.85.39 with SMTP id e7mr39191igz.1.1431347618176; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 05:33:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> References: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Proposal for new cmavo: {vau'u} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_870_203878199.1431347616963" X-Original-Sender: spheniscine@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_870_203878199.1431347616963 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_871_1344473628.1431347616964" ------=_Part_871_1344473628.1431347616964 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 {no'i} {la .ilmen.} said that a new selma'o might not be needed and that {xau / vau'u} could be rolled into selma'o UI; merely a marker saying "the following UI-clause applies to the whole sentence". This would allow {xau / vau'u} to be used even in the middle of a sentence... I don't think it'd be used that way often, but {au cu'i}. On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) wrote: > > I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which is in its > own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; acting as any > number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence. > > Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an > afterthought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last > thing in it. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi > vau ui}), but more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require > several {vau}, which just feels wrong. For example > > Instead of: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} > You can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui} > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_871_1344473628.1431347616964 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
{no'i}   {la .ilmen.} said that a new selma= 'o might not be needed and that {xau / vau'u} could be rolled into selma'o = UI; merely a marker saying "the following UI-clause applies to the whole se= ntence". This would allow {xau / vau'u} to be used even in the middle = of a sentence... I don't think it'd be used that way often, but {au cu'i}.<= /div>

On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheni= scine (la zipcpi) wrote:
I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which i= s in its own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; actin= g as any number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence.

Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an afterthou= ght, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last thing in it. = {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi vau ui}), but m= ore complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require several {vau},= which just feels wrong. For example

Instead of: {= do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} 
You = can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui}
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_871_1344473628.1431347616964-- ------=_Part_870_203878199.1431347616963--