Received: from mail-vn0-f59.google.com ([209.85.216.59]:34662) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Ys11w-00049H-HN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:55 -0700 Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62sf39968180vnb.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=NLuK9iobUsQha6xExUP6Y9vI6G2VvwR7FGMCA4z/UHg=; b=AXMlGbcEk+MB3wl8kbo8LCkJnenpRn+skd71P2Bw93GfX+igx2g6JW5hxI5YXw+VBh zEYlb9g8HP4dHCP/bepi1GYSJK5GtbxZlday/q+I4QEDLRouDZOhU7oLFnz7dD9zTvK1 ANgHcz9kuqJECFH5NY5k/PCPsJLkBZjOvsCVTEWlmxmbJX9BV/oLp6J4o1jbSl32VT6O 8uQ9dSJ848EHAgMplvQCi3phoEVykY9RnkSCQ8sIAymFlcVQkxgF0PZJF/sHIusBhZBy MgvmtbZyWu3fqFudKTZk50NjvqdrFpz2jGmLt9OxglEaZpezqSQQ0LXaNnqD8Ss5z20q 3tJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=NLuK9iobUsQha6xExUP6Y9vI6G2VvwR7FGMCA4z/UHg=; b=gcpHT/gP8+f/R3CGpg83JUPDYgrTuz3zwoHU1jFwEfUL8jmfF8ysqrTVX3kKyxBoko pKY5fsb3dks8S1veVnQZu8x4gBoVjkAL3rfFzWfwVxShYOeYmFWVPvSRYLahVEoBm7st 3xaOQh4GP9yiCF13CLsKZUJyHhH8YcN+FBsuzgXUlT0lERKrceS+gKJy8D3j7P/Ygf8H lDSCSCSm7D7mN8EPwmSKpVrdMgdtv11ACv7AKcj386sUNh1LNyiuMZXAfcFbJtT1ygqu YGCfchBlMbSVMCYGuXq11vhEwMIMIv7HGvfP8FzD7DinGtxyTX1wjBXCuuIde4A2+iMt QNVw== X-Received: by 10.50.122.105 with SMTP id lr9mr116802igb.11.1431401926096; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.170.164 with SMTP id g36ls1888164ioj.69.gmail; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.136.129 with SMTP id qa1mr11776igb.4.1431401925868; Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:38:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <335f1b33-9648-4968-af98-1916a61782ef@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> References: <3a378de3-6fd3-44c1-ae6e-960ef6ee27ea@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Proposal for new cmavo: {vau'u} MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_6085_1462753609.1431401924726" X-Original-Sender: spheniscine@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_6085_1462753609.1431401924726 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6086_107115607.1431401924726" ------=_Part_6086_107115607.1431401924726 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 So, any particular objections against allocating {xau} for this proposal? Seriously, I really use it quite often; I feel that the language has been missing a proper, context-free way of including attitudinals (and even other UI-cmavo, like {xu}) as an afterthought. If not, I'm adding it to the jbovlaste database, under sub-selma'o UI7 (shared with bu'o). On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) wrote: > > I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which is in its > own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; acting as any > number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence. > > Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an > afterthought, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last > thing in it. {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi > vau ui}), but more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require > several {vau}, which just feels wrong. For example > > Instead of: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} > You can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui} > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_6086_107115607.1431401924726 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So, any particular objections against allocating {xau} for= this proposal? Seriously, I really use it quite often; I feel that the lan= guage has been missing a proper, context-free way of including attitudinals= (and even other UI-cmavo, like {xu}) as an afterthought.

If not, I'm adding it to the jbovlaste database, under sub-selma'o UI7 (s= hared with bu'o).

On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 4:04:48 PM UTC+8, Sphen= iscine (la zipcpi) wrote:
I think it might be useful to have a new cmavo, {vau'u}, which = is in its own selma'o. It would act as a "super famyma'o / super vau"; acti= ng as any number of {vau}s needed to close off a sentence.

Why? Attitudinals, mostly; it'd allow adding attitudinals as an aftertho= ught, attaching it to the entire sentence rather than the last thing in it.= {vau} is sufficient for simple sentences (e.g. {do sidju mi vau ui}), but = more complex sentences with subclauses at the end may require several {vau}= , which just feels wrong. For example

Instead of: = {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau vau vau ui} 
You= can have: {do sidju mi lo nu mi zenba lo ni ricfu vau'u ui}

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_6086_107115607.1431401924726-- ------=_Part_6085_1462753609.1431401924726--