Received: from mail-wg0-f55.google.com ([74.125.82.55]:34739) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YsAw6-0005s6-T5 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:36 -0700 Received: by wggx12 with SMTP id x12sf2609742wgg.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=dpxjeKOxT0Udjkv0RJ/SCUDE1/ZrVEJGlk22ogr3LUk=; b=LOvpaU8m9XTIYI+y3rX7PYv02Q/+Y2SygoioOTxXAFpeMUUsoYJRaK3msuoP0wsYql 4z9h6QmZ9CS236XxSDTImtRfdXuX1XvVbrYIrEXkJCTj4w41NKZn8fRyPoCKKgo5EHgg /JE7Hx+S1Y51ZEQFUFn9M72GwhwG/UFz6kylR7kH6QxcLcO7OBypwnK9rSs8CTV/Uby6 MaluqcxIL9ObbX8FpUn+tW/k+xjNU7Ts4ZhktjFm6MikUyXagDcVvdb96g8BYwelM+dT sA9yiOzjOaP4DLFM93cdAwQuIjK0xe1TERu0SupyeQ+fAQFuWaUboHrb/P4SirHs90lt e8QQ== X-Received: by 10.152.87.168 with SMTP id az8mr190473lab.31.1431440004322; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.23.197 with SMTP id o5ls36478laf.66.gmail; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.151.146 with SMTP id uq18mr10711421lbb.20.1431440003691; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m3si108069wia.1.2015.05.12.07.13.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::235; Received: by mail-wg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c8so11465653wgi.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.172.130 with SMTP id bc2mr31261592wjc.85.1431440003543; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:13:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <04cecf13-9f41-4589-9e37-e3987ef53330@googlegroups.com> References: <04cecf13-9f41-4589-9e37-e3987ef53330@googlegroups.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:13:03 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Possible polysemy clashes for "regular affixes" in lujvo? To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c6342edb5830515e3184e X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e013c6342edb5830515e3184e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-05-12 16:42 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) : > Certain gismu have, over time, become treated like "prefixes" and > "suffixes"; they are used for many lujvo, and they make them in a highly > predictable manner. > > For example: {zabna binxo -> zanbi'o "to (improve/change in a favorable > manner)"} is treated as {zabna fa lo nu X1 binxo X2 X3 [X4 ...]} > While {binxo gasnu -> bixygau "to (change something else / cause something > else to change)"} is treated as {X1 gasnu lo nu X2 binxo X3 X4 [X5 ...]} > > Unfortunately this causes clashes when two "promiscuous" gismu meet! What > exactly would {zangau} mean? > > It could mean {zabna fa lo nu X1 gasnu X2} (roughly "does good deeds / > does favors"), or it could mean {X1 gasnu lo nu X2 zabna X3 X4} (possibly > "to bless")! > Neither zanbi'o nor zangau are in the dictionary. 1. I wouldn't create any words that lack roots. If they lack then they are naljvajvo/cimjvo. 2. In other cases I would perceive suffixes as winning over prefixes i.e. like tanru work (expanding starts from the end). > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e013c6342edb5830515e3184e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-05-12 16:42 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) &l= t;spheniscine@gm= ail.com>:
= Certain gismu have, over time, become treated like "prefixes" and= "suffixes"; they are used for many lujvo, and they make them in = a highly predictable manner.

For example: {zabna binxo -= > zanbi'o "to (improve/change in a favorable manner)"} is = treated as {zabna fa lo nu X1 binxo X2 X3 [X4 ...]}
While {binxo = gasnu -> bixygau "to (change something else / cause something else = to change)"} is treated as {X1 gasnu lo nu X2 binxo X3 X4 [X5 ...]}

Unfortunately this causes clashes when two "pro= miscuous" gismu meet! What exactly would {zangau} mean?

=
It could mean {zabna fa lo nu X1 gasnu X2} (roughly "does g= ood deeds / does favors"), or it could mean {X1 gasnu lo nu X2 zabna X= 3 X4} (possibly "to bless")!

Neither zanbi'o nor zangau are in the dictionary.
1. = I wouldn't create any words that lack roots. If they lack then they are= naljvajvo/cimjvo.
2. In other cases I would perceive suffixes as= winning over prefixes i.e. like tanru work (expanding starts from the end)= .

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e013c6342edb5830515e3184e--