Received: from mail-la0-f60.google.com ([209.85.215.60]:33717) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YsBbh-0006i2-GI for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:36 -0700 Received: by labgd6 with SMTP id gd6sf3250453lab.0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=fy0MGLJL59hSLFAaaMZdsjSal4nHWbAttiFRIzcvblE=; b=hCR/g+wmZzYkzE41RsO7C3Dfn9N8ByKGP0yiiVTHr+HEM+fFPpJ4uXqA45EOJkieuJ 57+YWZvdBoRxl9xJyX6IKfCTbbIWARrdzQunK4dCiQSPw7mHxnYZpKW5d065Pw+wX7ZF mSuISmaQoeADzJRoDRA6sAk+euaFYimS+3FK73tzmm53VynPd+pgUdWRc4RtTstmpKSz 7tv7qXGzQFqk+rZMCbGKUez0Toop+ghCvYP+VL4ADpnzR4zYGauWPe+Qc9vNEiZtLpg1 /H7VOat5fZome/mxJert9XqnKgkkH9cq2bCgmMQJOGvl5n59i6o7kQRYRNh50VxnxIHW uZmQ== X-Received: by 10.152.229.133 with SMTP id sq5mr197263lac.24.1431442582646; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.2.70 with SMTP id 6ls44911las.14.gmail; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.53.102 with SMTP id a6mr10838847lbp.16.1431442581002; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc3si115213wib.2.2015.05.12.07.56.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e; Received: by mail-wg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d10so10592469wgn.2 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.13.198 with SMTP id fa6mr31012553wid.41.1431442580900; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.221.167 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <590cca7e-d7d3-4866-b4f7-743c4f268cc6@googlegroups.com> References: <04cecf13-9f41-4589-9e37-e3987ef53330@googlegroups.com> <590cca7e-d7d3-4866-b4f7-743c4f268cc6@googlegroups.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:56:00 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Possible polysemy clashes for "regular affixes" in lujvo? To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d64898d0f400515e3b2b8 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d043d64898d0f400515e3b2b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-05-12 17:51 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) : > la gleki cu cusku di'e > > >> Neither zanbi'o nor zangau are in the dictionary. >> 1. I wouldn't create any words that lack roots. If they lack then they >> are naljvajvo/cimjvo. >> 2. In other cases I would perceive suffixes as winning over prefixes i.e. >> like tanru work (expanding starts from the end). >> > > Actually, that's kinda part of the problem. Like I've said, they've kinda > become extremely common prefixes/suffixes like English "un-" or "-er", so > adding every possible useful combination to the dictionary is a Herculean > effort beyond what little people we have maintaining it in their spare > time. {zabna} and {mabla} are especially bad this way, as their rafsi {zan} > and {mal} has been combined with almost anything to mean "X in a favorable > / disfavorable manner; X with a positive / negative connotation" > I can't see any arbitrariness in that. If they turned into suffixes having certain rules of expansion then it's a matter of describing those rules. -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d043d64898d0f400515e3b2b8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-05-12 17:51 GMT+03:00 Spheniscine (la zipcpi) &l= t;spheniscine@gm= ail.com>:
=
la gleki cu cusku di'e
=C2=A0
Neither zanb= i'o nor zangau are in the dictionary.
1. I wouldn't creat= e any words that lack roots. If they lack then they are naljvajvo/cimjvo.
2. In other cases I would perceive suffixes as winning over prefix= es i.e. like tanru work (expanding starts from the end).
<= /blockquote>

Actually, that's kinda part of t= he problem. Like I've said, they've kinda become extremely common p= refixes/suffixes like English "un-" or "-er", so adding= every possible useful combination to the dictionary is a Herculean effort = beyond what little people we have maintaining it in their spare time. {zabn= a} and {mabla} are especially bad this way, as their rafsi {zan} and {mal} = has been combined with almost anything to mean "X in a favorable / dis= favorable manner; X with a positive / negative connotation"

I can't see any arbitrariness in that= . If they turned into suffixes having certain rules of expansion then it= 9;s a matter of describing those rules.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d043d64898d0f400515e3b2b8--