Received: from mail-qc0-f191.google.com ([209.85.216.191]:33597) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz6k8-0006zE-G1 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:57 -0700 Received: by qcvp6 with SMTP id p6sf26042768qcv.0 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=JLi9bIaduSpAA6MzK8TGUwFl8JOogQkXBLhmGNA8r4w=; b=vP0msRQ+/knz5uta+31uonXzV8fcppmXCufDZVWs/ISlGrOK+ugO9fOBChOUqpT2jS sboIihfCmOASO619QwKciFdDtVJaxrTBXJ7GvcEz1nemeKVoSKTZ2c7ho3N1ADeOJYL+ 4vCuoyThC0P1qSj01ScgyEUiu2dGNAGBL5SiHQ3RYfZSqgOe2Ldsu4rjWuTl44kGq7lS Y5geJmyOe59FBjzgmKyZO1RI3T+ixiUrfhk4rySk0wP4cojCpuX7yHEIBxbbQKJTxnSj 0+2ry4ztcdNRkhXBUBmWhc5YvDybas5qEnEU93FpOYsOkxNewNoFh33itd1bc/s/U+J6 I4lw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=JLi9bIaduSpAA6MzK8TGUwFl8JOogQkXBLhmGNA8r4w=; b=Q7N9dFk7LDXxDU2zoyyM7wO0o2tM9B6jeZfMgTtk6JKP6kjpM+jHTFdI51Nr1NhZtR fAEj6TCwUG2tTDwCKLMMYiX9DtSlfyKj9E0ugf0inrL4Vs3woZEdr3UmqawtGaox48G0 jH3wYva62Qz7cYV2tLeQ7cKpGc2woG1Gx4EyUy420GxemXypzIwX4IhvNxYwBOgcyHtV eYG5YkgyZ01EUycAwHep42HxM02JlIH1cZJ3JJd/+lXysxdfvqdkXb/5PRl+n7j59BgX 8M77hLMRw0EJEiQMoVYCDWCDOKSEfmOdCiRJvahzEa6NiIqvetQ8DVq3ESTix3fVohiW +jhw== X-Received: by 10.50.142.39 with SMTP id rt7mr93880igb.17.1433092182565; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.47.7 with SMTP id j7ls1064039ioo.41.gmail; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.138.70 with SMTP id qo6mr95235igb.13.1433092182146; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:09:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <21d0528e-7ece-41ca-a9e3-f57b22cc3f43@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal: loi lerfu tcita detri; the final word on the problem of dates and times? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_2763_1633934971.1433092180799" X-Original-Sender: spheniscine@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_bar: --- ------=_Part_2763_1633934971.1433092180799 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2764_1671663408.1433092180800" ------=_Part_2764_1671663408.1433092180800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that just break all uses of {xy pa} when talking about the definitions of words? Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use of strings for entry of ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer {li} because - It's shorter - Dates and periods technically *are* numbers in a certain sense; arithmetic can be performed on them, despite the fact that in some ways they don't act like real-numbers, due to the varying length of months and years. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_2764_1671663408.1433092180800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that just break = all uses of {xy pa} when talking about the definitions of words? 
=
Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use of strings = for entry of ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer {li} because=
  • It's shorter=
  • Dates and periods technically= *are* numbers in a certain sense; arithmetic can be performed on them, des= pite the fact that in some ways they don't act like real-numbers, due to th= e varying length of months and years.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_2764_1671663408.1433092180800-- ------=_Part_2763_1633934971.1433092180799--