Received: from mail-ob0-f191.google.com ([209.85.214.191]:34745) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz76f-0007By-TM for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:33:10 -0700 Received: by obcwm4 with SMTP id wm4sf28626052obc.1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SyiAUHSrVwxXjpppkJGnEfxz0y3iXuapTKeCYwYM++8=; b=GzUhs5nJ8FVk4eH9Ua0DQ/bqUUUfmnj+ox+nabaPrVi+xtjTPltD2m9Y31LC1c6prL mZjvKpLR0mZXODyj/1NkLSq8xKIa650+6LU/eH1/PRslE04dfwf6ELMGW5gG7Ub7Wipg IVCpMIrdBulIphPJdGWhZxsUAGUIzkrDzun5y8kkDjziHhDtfezbAN04CuC9seNQRVk9 CvbpGnVOsQgZntuoqSTWg/QZF4QIycjOjbx1tpDm2VNk2YiOT8+f8rZM+7Ngxpz78M1K qqbu5rhLFDE4wAa8DtUeHg0W8tT8yIFbd/rga0W6x+vupVvPJFPXAemjD83S8Lr9rR2+ klKg== X-Received: by 10.50.61.193 with SMTP id s1mr94949igr.14.1433093579915; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.138.223 with SMTP id c92ls1324668ioj.104.gmail; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.128.40 with SMTP id nl8mr10753939igb.4.1433093579513; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16si651841ign.2.2015.05.31.10.32.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f; Received: by mail-ig0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id pi8so46175940igb.1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.111.131 with SMTP id ii3mr8573778igb.47.1433093579422; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.157.204 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.157.204 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:32:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <21d0528e-7ece-41ca-a9e3-f57b22cc3f43@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 13:32:59 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal: loi lerfu tcita detri; the final word on the problem of dates and times? From: Alex Burka To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41419cbb40d0051764199d X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=durka42@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_bar: --- --047d7b41419cbb40d0051764199d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Not sure anyone agrees in how to mark places in jbojbo definitions anyway. Though if you watch Selckiku's old videos, he says {xyxipa} not {xypa}. That said I still like this date notation :) On May 31, 2015 1:09 PM, "Spheniscine (la zipcpi)" wrote: > I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that just break all uses of {xy > pa} when talking about the definitions of words? > > Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use of strings for entry of > ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer {li} because > > - It's shorter > - Dates and periods technically *are* numbers in a certain sense; > arithmetic can be performed on them, despite the fact that in some ways > they don't act like real-numbers, due to the varying length of months and > years. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lojban/s5aV14VFN5s/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b41419cbb40d0051764199d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Not sure anyone agrees in how to mark places in jbojbo defin= itions anyway. Though if you watch Selckiku's old videos, he says {xyxi= pa} not {xypa}. That said I still like this date notation :)

On May 31, 2015 1:09 PM, "Spheniscine (la z= ipcpi)" <spheniscine@gmail= .com> wrote:
=
I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that jus= t break all uses of {xy pa} when talking about the definitions of words?=C2= =A0

Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use= of strings for entry of ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer = {li} because
  • It's = shorter
  • Dates and periods= technically *are* numbers in a certain sense; arithmetic can be performed = on them, despite the fact that in some ways they don't act like real-nu= mbers, due to the varying length of months and years.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.go= ogle.com/d/topic/lojban/s5aV14VFN5s/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b41419cbb40d0051764199d--