Received: from mail-la0-f56.google.com ([209.85.215.56]:32846) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Yz7ON-0007aV-W1 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:30 -0700 Received: by lamq1 with SMTP id q1sf34299375lam.0 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=mdjz/txTOZt0hMbdTwSAr0lM4wPVOibwuYfM4ODpqi8=; b=xb+KtGsdS2oNQ8K/v0P7x1xcM7cmmvO2HFKGKw5PliOq1UhTe+EGdpyKh++6JX/4cG C1zUG7Lp4HQ4rAJUdEXGzJmXqQm0oFIVbQHGVT4UTmJF3gX7u4dPMiNyde55uKsO6et9 d/nbieweLJ6WpmsJxJ3mMHcmxAAg3CclWC+Ce2Nf1VSj+v3ic+3k+Uw5IfbfTHkVuOxS Tw+oPJMur1KICzO6T5Km9iPar88yan2WJgLFzkCTbvdov24ZgrAGZ8HtgymOrq1loRVl xpZTGtGQIHYb97bdyB+nS4M0NQtlfXFhjAAFQTzy0myku/xYf5nFv28jl0JiJwsGSQC5 ZFSg== X-Received: by 10.152.21.70 with SMTP id t6mr203621lae.42.1433094666257; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.181.34 with SMTP id dt2ls510285lac.14.gmail; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.19.161 with SMTP id g1mr10929459lae.8.1433094665628; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6si396342wiz.0.2015.05.31.10.51.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::232; Received: by wgme6 with SMTP id e6so97647242wgm.2 for ; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.75.48 with SMTP id z16mr13356952wiv.49.1433094665520; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.26.17 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 10:51:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <21d0528e-7ece-41ca-a9e3-f57b22cc3f43@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:51:05 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Proposal: loi lerfu tcita detri; the final word on the problem of dates and times? From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438951977ccc90517645af7 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d0438951977ccc90517645af7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) < spheniscine@gmail.com> wrote: > I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that just break all uses of {xy > pa} when talking about the definitions of words? > Those are "xy xi pa". The contexts where we don't want digits and lerfu to mix (e.g. ".abu za'u re'u cusku", "by re mei", "lo re bolci zo'u pa by xunre .i je pa by blanu", "xy xi pa dunda xy xi re xy xi ci" etc. are much much more common than the need for mixed strings, and having to use "boi" for those is a pain. Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use of strings for entry of > ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer {li} because > > - It's shorter > - Dates and periods technically *are* numbers in a certain sense; > arithmetic can be performed on them, despite the fact that in some ways > they don't act like real-numbers, due to the varying length of months and > years. > > "me'o" and "li" are in the same selma'o, so the issue is the same for both. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d0438951977ccc90517645af7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) <sphenisc= ine@gmail.com> wrote:
I've not heard of that proposal. Wouldn't that just bre= ak all uses of {xy pa} when talking about the definitions of words?=C2=A0

Those are "xy xi pa".
<= div>
The contexts where we don't want digits and lerfu to= mix (e.g. ".abu za'u re'u cusku", "by re mei",= "lo re bolci zo'u pa by xunre .i je pa by blanu", "xy x= i pa dunda xy xi re xy xi ci" etc. are much much more common than the = need for mixed strings, and having to use "boi" for those is a pa= in.

Besides, {me'o} still works, paralleling the use of strings for entry= of ISO dates in programming languages. I just prefer {li} because
  • It's shorter
  • Dates and periods technically *are* nu= mbers in a certain sense; arithmetic can be performed on them, despite the = fact that in some ways they don't act like real-numbers, due to the var= ying length of months and years.
<= div>"me'o" and "li" are in the same selma'o, so= the issue is the same for both.

mu'o mi'e= xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d0438951977ccc90517645af7--