Received: from mail-vn0-f63.google.com ([209.85.216.63]:34467) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAk1M-0004KV-Kx for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:48 -0700 Received: by vnbf129 with SMTP id f129sf22839555vnb.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=lBLs8KO31VzE+J5Ko4/WLM3mYEciajYE6MMXpr6sqvs=; b=Jj263Yg/+HMUjNzO4KqxEp+bMnAOT5Tqd+BKR8wnT9gwkUvpwVN0MV8z3FHe/Q2hsO GErN161EROlGBHA52H5DX2Tf3dqHtZ0uL38AUh+kw10kUwp0BWUu5hwngWJMLKwheAV7 XudnCQGqpAg0VA5nSJ8w4j9jqvByRLH1yEjW0CqAThxohcy7Z/je5rYtjB4gKb78wOBk Xyr/++v6ctSDxmxRSaTk8pjo/1V4NIA+fjZBC/GkY5BUNGYRGRdcN4mIfUfd3f4L/mTL U+vLEVzZuGAalYiEpkseX5EP/WCgVmw0OD1Wl4h0OABGGV4Z61VEUYq3ZyBTVwhewmsf tX8g== X-Received: by 10.182.50.136 with SMTP id c8mr232531obo.10.1435864774607; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.70.69 with SMTP id k5ls604938obu.42.gmail; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.213.74 with SMTP id nq10mr38095354obc.39.1435864774230; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net (eastrmfepo203.cox.net. [68.230.241.218]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id l198si730789ywe.2.2015.07.02.12.19.33 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.218 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.218; Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20150702191933.DRNK786.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:19:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id nXKZ1q00C1Nn1eG01XKZKY; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:19:33 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.55958EC5.01C5,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=KuOTLxqN c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=FvAEXBeo5g4A:10 a=7lh4heZmSdtXEUrlqkQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <55958EC6.9070809@lojban.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:19:34 -0400 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] jbonunsla - location References: <5096706.OK0AdRCTgh@caracal> <5568903.UmGzmqQki9@caracal> <3746036.DDyrWyEgf1@caracal> <559576DF.3050000@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.218 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_bar: --- On 7/2/2015 2:53 PM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > Bob, it's true that ISO-8601 set the standard as Monday as first > day, but that's not culturally neutral. It is still the *international standard*. Creating anything else might be more "neutral", but it won't be consistent with the international standard. And we decided long ago that international standards trump cultural neutrality. Which is also why we ruled out playing games with time-of-day which has at least as many problems as weeks. The metric system isn't culturally neutral either (obviously biased against Americans %^( ). But we still decided to put all the metric units and prefixes in the gismu list. Even so, jeftu does have the possibility of supporting non-standard weeks. I would have no problem with people using esoteric variants of weeks in that context. But I would strongly object to enshrining non-standardness in anything official, and people treat jvovlaste as being quasi-official. There is no point in cultural neutrality in vocabulary if it makes it necessary to learn non-standard systems. Otherwise, we arguably should be going to some sort of metric system of time and date, with 100,000 seconds in a day and 100 days in the year. We wouldn't want to be culturally biased towards earthism. > So, to reiterate, billions of non-Xtian people refer to > other-than-Monday as the first day of the week. Not when they want to communicate internationally. > It's hardly universal. International standards are by definition universal. At least for the 164 nations that are part of the ISO (which is a helluva lot more than Europe). And this whole question of standards in dates and times was something that was actually argued about and formally decided by the membership at a meeting back when no one had even conceived of a byfy. Indeed, at the time I was arguing for use of a base 12 system for time of day, and was strongly overridden. lojbab -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.