Received: from mail-qg0-f55.google.com ([209.85.192.55]:34638) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZH6qg-000448-1v for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:55:14 -0700 Received: by qgdf45 with SMTP id f45sf31456133qgd.1 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=cljPvqOy3dke/67nZKmewhr10BANWrN12AXBbX2qrH0=; b=VZFJHs/Pk4hcltmXXGRhRJp8yrWGnarl3cfbs0sA+Y25VLkqviA5hB733lZLEXWtc5 KlL/fmKnNl0wOCKcwh2VL5RkIqE7o2axmMgq0Hq5Co5YUpxYlkHT7zqZvI3W/+PVYXkX pEPSm0ykQZkDF402ursnby+CNBHWJl+hDc0vk67pEHmwQxq/cq1k4rIt+RnoYzxF3LnX f00hvD/QABPKmt8xenVciT4cmYO+EmgW7l3cgyut84snzVnXRqxZD3HD67nn9K6Tpd3Z 1y6gQ7JyN2gLkHxLtvxLTvu1H7ENHinv5lbz7a9ruY+XAhPAGTyMctfVLX+EiNyYn4Re zj/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=cljPvqOy3dke/67nZKmewhr10BANWrN12AXBbX2qrH0=; b=ZYBDk1B52PgEQC5ufITXUdwaDma7zuN3EExtWhKJCzi3kwIj3Ru0VifWuPFORSoMtm 9XEl9VKpgcj3PNSjJJnYPk+gS1wQYxjFbeoD7ZUz5UQpZU3J+44s10SXk9hvgXMpB8dA Tq70m6w/ETdST8fxfxudR0zt9jiMiCHqBw+TiwBpNFxdCM/dK7pXx7sd7ChgIgwfJGUw p4ffnCxfYaTS0NyFqh6ZSGmyGBrXwdEdQPycoA1nukJtTlTszIATQHO/kW27cep8NOn2 h1y1Hn1WTZJuevaNLToIbihBHhP4/nwAsprjWQayeDTQHCUieJNM7bLHNZRv+WGjTT8y 9KaQ== X-Received: by 10.50.102.71 with SMTP id fm7mr138754igb.8.1437382492103; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:54:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.170.202 with SMTP id g71ls151920ioj.55.gmail; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.50.243 with SMTP id f19mr138071igo.0.1437382491892; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:54:50 -0700 (PDT) From: guskant To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <111fbfc0-49f0-4ff0-9c88-31e0383cd3f9@googlegroups.com> References: <111fbfc0-49f0-4ff0-9c88-31e0383cd3f9@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: {tu'e...tu'u} in NU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_538_1399689068.1437382490649" X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_538_1399689068.1437382490649 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_539_425198536.1437382490649" ------=_Part_539_425198536.1437382490649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 01:04:03 UTC, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) a =C3=A9crit= : > > *{tu'e lo mabla cu fasnu .i lo zabna cu fasnu tu'u ca lo nu mi stuvi'e le= =20 >> sralygu'e} > > > Any solutions for this? I've been told there is a proposed experimental= =20 > cmavo called {zo'au} that is "postnex" the way that {zo'u} is prenex. I'm= =20 > not quite sure how that would work though, and if I'm gonna have to use a= n=20 > experimental selma'o for this, I might as well be changing the grammar of= =20 > tu'e...tu'u ...=20 > Your example shows necessity of adding a term string that spans over the=20 statement to the left. I think it is not very difficult to implement=20 grammatically zo'au-clause: just creating a structure like prenex, and make= =20 it elidible famyma'o of a statement.=20 However, zo'au-clause will produce more complex semantics than the current= =20 for the following reason:=20 logical items like negation, numbers and bound variables semantically span= =20 over the following items, and "postnex" should break the logical structure= =20 of the leading statement when it appears at the end of the statement.=20 It is not good for me, and I don't intend to implement "postnex" to la=20 zantufa for now. An alternative idea is to use {no'a} with SEI (or experimental _new_ SOI of= =20 la ilmentufa): tu'e lo mabla cu fasnu .i lo zabna cu fasnu tu'u sei ca lo nu mi stuvi'e le= =20 sralygu'e cu no'a=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_539_425198536.1437382490649 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Le lundi 20 juillet 2015 01:04:03 UTC, Spheniscine= (la zipcpi) a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
*{tu'e lo mabla cu fasnu .i lo zabn= a cu fasnu tu'u ca lo nu mi stuvi'e le sralygu'e}
<= div>
Any solutions for this? I've been told there is a pr= oposed experimental cmavo called {zo'au} that is "postnex" th= e way that {zo'u} is prenex. I'm not quite sure how that would work= though, and if I'm gonna have to use an experimental selma'o for t= his, I might as well be changing the grammar of tu'e...tu'u ...=C2= =A0


Your example= shows necessity of adding a term string that spans over the statement to t= he left. I think it is not very difficult to implement grammatically zo'= ;au-clause: just creating a structure like prenex, and make it elidible fam= yma'o of a statement.=C2=A0

However, zo'au= -clause will produce more complex semantics than the current for the follow= ing reason:=C2=A0
logical items like negation, numbers and bound = variables semantically span over the following items, and "postnex&quo= t; should break the logical structure of the leading statement when it appe= ars at the end of the statement.=C2=A0

It is not g= ood for me, and I don't intend to implement "postnex" to la z= antufa for now.

An alternative idea is to use {no&= #39;a} with SEI (or experimental _new_ SOI of la ilmentufa):
tu&#= 39;e lo mabla cu fasnu .i lo zabna cu fasnu tu'u sei ca lo nu mi stuvi&= #39;e le sralygu'e cu no'a=C2=A0


<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_539_425198536.1437382490649-- ------=_Part_538_1399689068.1437382490649--