Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: la durka <durka42@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <5187eb35-a181-4ddb-a394-157d1524b5e5@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <48946854-5b9e-4450-bafd-7a048200277b@googlegroups.com>
References: <48946854-5b9e-4450-bafd-7a048200277b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: "Metalinguistic self-doubt"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_598_1323774258.1437494380780"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_598_1323774258.1437494380780
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_599_93027278.1437494380788"

------=_Part_599_93027278.1437494380788
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

For metalinguistic concerns we have the {jo'a}-{na'i} scale; {ju'o} is=20
different. For "did I word this correctly" I'd probably say {jo'a nai toi'e=
=20
ju'o cu'i} or if experimental cmavo are not allowed, just resort to {sei=20
.oise'i xu smudra}. Unless there's a lot of usage of {ju'o} in conflict=20
with the dictionary definition, I'd say we should leave it alone.

El lunes, 20 de julio de 2015, 17:37:13 (UTC+2), Spheniscine (la zipcpi)=20
escribi=C3=B3:
>
> I wonder if there is any way to distinguish between self-doubt of the=20
> truthfulness of a statement ({ju'ocu'i}; some prefer {ju'onai}, as they=
=20
> believe "impossibility" is better expressed as {ju'o naku}) and=20
> "metalinguistic doubt", as in, "did I word this correctly"?
>

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_599_93027278.1437494380788
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">For metalinguistic concerns we have the {jo&#39;a}-{na&#39=
;i} scale; {ju&#39;o} is different. For &quot;did I word this correctly&quo=
t; I&#39;d probably say {jo&#39;a nai toi&#39;e ju&#39;o cu&#39;i} or if ex=
perimental cmavo are not allowed, just resort to {sei .oise&#39;i xu smudra=
}. Unless there&#39;s a lot of usage of {ju&#39;o} in conflict with the dic=
tionary definition, I&#39;d say we should leave it alone.<br><br>El lunes, =
20 de julio de 2015, 17:37:13 (UTC+2), Spheniscine (la zipcpi) escribi=C3=
=B3:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex=
;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"ltr">I wonder =
if there is any way to distinguish between self-doubt of the truthfulness o=
f a statement ({ju&#39;ocu&#39;i}; some prefer {ju&#39;onai}, as they belie=
ve &quot;impossibility&quot; is better expressed as {ju&#39;o naku}) and &q=
uot;metalinguistic doubt&quot;, as in, &quot;did I word this correctly&quot=
;?</div></blockquote></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_599_93027278.1437494380788--
------=_Part_598_1323774258.1437494380780--