Received: from mail-wi0-f191.google.com ([209.85.212.191]:34771) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJVsM-0002Ca-JI for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:43 -0700 Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11sf27862209wic.1 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=jg99jQGb4XR2hebpGJtxovsb0Ei7rSt0t8ZFLtjLS/U=; b=ioWoiUEgFu7xHsayBWQeihBzqvInMTAVlbpNCLzTGLvUlUXcv8aZh6h4Oe81Jnnn0P cGSElRFBKJLemLHfPTSDbtFx/v2c948u1rhDXGqhvsjZ48JTGDtaqN2oiVm0f5YyEUIc IxqUJ1AtalwCqMfMwydAbdPBw/VA2lq2QHase72d8bOGJvxYEkFXOQQqYtzFLPEWhcQe ZhjDZ9q8bFT/pUP9f95jBP/Ba8XGyQLWKqlw5PN8NVKXJuoJSvsYV8T1Xxxi7E2BDk2u ttjlZP6wx1Zh0yC9wu4WL4TFOMppTVCWrFo3aoKPG+fMoxWXRRM4YrFs4lDZHz8aoIDI Ig1w== X-Received: by 10.152.25.138 with SMTP id c10mr343003lag.5.1437955351362; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.88.7 with SMTP id bc7ls593512lab.74.gmail; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.88.111 with SMTP id bf15mr10937464lab.9.1437955350537; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hm7si255992wib.0.2015.07.26.17.02.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::235; Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so90196565wib.0 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.11.7 with SMTP id m7mr49174953wjb.56.1437955350410; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.80.87 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6a46c64c-b828-4be8-a1e9-5a4bf41255e6@googlegroups.com> References: <1c2a3b64-07b1-4023-a740-362deb17da34@googlegroups.com> <55AD070D.5020903@gmx.de> <55AE1142.5090807@gmx.de> <8bab9435-5f94-4742-b74a-8cceac2c8a60@googlegroups.com> <55AE616F.9040509@gmx.de> <8e076a72-407a-498b-bb60-a2badff5e40f@googlegroups.com> <3c04f416-2d4d-4d3f-8d55-a090d799090f@googlegroups.com> <55B162F5.8070302@gmail.com> <88204a7b-4228-4563-811a-14e4583cf8bd@googlegroups.com> <55B55267.9060603@gmail.com> <6a46c64c-b828-4be8-a1e9-5a4bf41255e6@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 21:02:30 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d259add3cf3051bd01130 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::235 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --047d7b5d259add3cf3051bd01130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM, guskant wrote: > > Le dimanche 26 juillet 2015 21:34:54 UTC, Ilmen a =C3=A9crit : >> >> On 26/07/2015 15:29, guskant wrote: >> > Le jeudi 23 juillet 2015 21:56:28 UTC, Ilmen a =C3=A9crit : >> >> ro da poi ke'a su'o de viska cu se kanla su'o di >>> =3D ro da poi su'o de zo'u ke'a de viska ku'o su'o di zo'u di da kanla >>> =3D ro da zo'u ganai su'o de zo'u da de viska gi su'o di zo'u di da kan= la >>> =3D roldza fa loka ko'a ce'ai ganai suzdza fa loka ko'a ce'u viska gi >>> suzdza fa loka ce'u ko'a kanla >>> =3D roldza fa loka ko'a ce'ai zilvlina fa lodu'u jitfa fa lodu'u suzdza= fa >>> loka ko'a ce'u viska kei kei kei fe lodu'u suzdza fa loka ce'u ko'a kan= la >>> >>> It seems correct. And then how do you transform it into a prenex normal >> form? >> >> {ro da zo'u ganai su'o de zo'u da de viska gi su'o di zo'u di da kanla} >> =3D =E2=88=80x((=E2=88=83y(viska(x,y))) =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83z(kanla(z,x)= )) >> >> # Application of the "(=E2=88=83x=CF=95) =E2=86=92 =CF=88" =E2=89=A1 "= =E2=88=80x(=CF=95 =E2=86=92 =CF=88)" transformation: >> =E2=89=A1 =E2=88=80x=E2=88=80y(viska(x,y) =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83z(kanla(z,= x))) >> >> # Application of the "=CF=95 =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83x=CF=88)" =E2=89=A1 "= =E2=88=83x(=CF=95 =E2=86=92 =CF=88)" transformation: >> =E2=89=A1 =E2=88=80x=E2=88=80y(=E2=88=83z(viska(x,y) =E2=86=92 kanla(z,x= )) >> >> =3D {ro da ro de su'o di zo'u ganai da de viska gi di da kanla} (prenex >> normal form) >> > > I appreciate your formation. One point to confirm is about your first > formation using {roldza} and {suzdza}. That is one of a reasonable > interpretation of a bridi nested in {poi}-clause, and I agree to that > interpretation. Is that a common interpretation among lojban speakers? In > fact, la xorxes seems to be against it, and the prenex in {poi}-clause > cannot be put out according to his interpretation, and his interpretation > is also consistent. > Why do I seem to be against it? I agree with Ilmen's expansions, and notice that he does have a prenex in a poi clause in one of the steps. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b5d259add3cf3051bd01130 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 7:04 PM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote:
Le dima= nche 26 juillet 2015 21:34:54 UTC, Ilmen a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
On 26/07/2015 15:29, guskant wrote:=C2=A0
=
=
Le jeudi 23 juillet 2015 21:56:28 UTC, Ilmen a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
=
ro da poi ke'a su'o de viska cu se kanla su'o di
=3D ro da poi su'o de zo'u ke'a de viska ku'o su&= #39;o di zo'u di da kanla
=3D ro da zo'u ganai su'o de zo'u da de viska gi su&#= 39;o di zo'u di da kanla
=3D roldza fa loka ko'a ce'ai ganai suzdza fa loka ko'= ;a ce'u viska gi suzdza fa loka ce'u ko'a kanla
=3D roldza fa loka ko'a ce'ai zilvlina fa lodu'u jitf= a fa lodu'u suzdza fa loka ko'a ce'u viska kei kei kei fe lodu'u = suzdza fa loka ce'u ko'a kanla

It seems correct. And then how do you transform it into a prenex normal form?
{ro da zo'u ganai su'o de zo'u da de viska gi su'o di z= o'u di da kanla}
=3D =E2=88=80x((=E2=88=83y(viska(x,y))) =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83z(kanla(z,x= )))

# Application of the "(=E2=88=83x=CF=95) =E2=86=92 =CF=88" = =E2=89=A1 "=E2=88=80x(=CF=95 =E2=86=92 =CF=88)" transformation: =E2=89=A1 =E2=88=80x=E2=88=80y(viska(x,y) =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83z(kanla(z= ,x)))

# Application of the "=CF=95 =E2=86=92 (=E2=88=83x=CF=88)" = =E2=89=A1 "=E2=88=83x(=CF=95 =E2=86=92 =CF=88)" transformation: =E2=89=A1 =E2=88=80x=E2=88=80y(=E2=88=83z(viska(x,y) =E2=86=92 kanla(z,= x))

=3D {ro da ro de su'o di zo'u ganai da de viska gi di da kanla} (prenex normal form)

I app= reciate your formation. One point to confirm is about your first formation = using {roldza} and {suzdza}. That is one of a reasonable interpretation of = a bridi nested in {poi}-clause, and I agree to that interpretation. Is that= a common interpretation among lojban speakers? In fact, la xorxes seems to= be against it, and the prenex in {poi}-clause cannot be put out according = to his interpretation, and his interpretation is also consistent.

Why do I seem to be against it? I agree w= ith Ilmen's expansions, and notice that he does have a prenex in a poi = clause in one of the steps.

mu'o mi'e xorx= es

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b5d259add3cf3051bd01130--