Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Cc: jjllambias@gmail.com
Message-Id: <8420a2a0-7fe2-43e7-84a1-34d1e3fa057e@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2eakUd9wbFoQUuwV_NhSHLPDZVQpqYLiraZP7jDDVaYDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1c2a3b64-07b1-4023-a740-362deb17da34@googlegroups.com>
 <55AD070D.5020903@gmx.de>
 <f74f87f4-75be-4400-927c-0cf13f8a344a@googlegroups.com>
 <55AE1142.5090807@gmx.de>
 <8bab9435-5f94-4742-b74a-8cceac2c8a60@googlegroups.com>
 <55AE616F.9040509@gmx.de>
 <8e076a72-407a-498b-bb60-a2badff5e40f@googlegroups.com>
 <CAO7tK2cWJ335yUO4Q+TLdCRpsdvJKdMotSEyzeVjhMv0sBzXdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3c04f416-2d4d-4d3f-8d55-a090d799090f@googlegroups.com>
 <CAO7tK2cjcZdxcDVS6gU+BfXYt1368c8yoF94a0xNwx_EbdyUvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <55B162F5.8070302@gmail.com>
 <88204a7b-4228-4563-811a-14e4583cf8bd@googlegroups.com>
 <55B55267.9060603@gmail.com>
 <6a46c64c-b828-4be8-a1e9-5a4bf41255e6@googlegroups.com>
 <CAO7tK2eakUd9wbFoQUuwV_NhSHLPDZVQpqYLiraZP7jDDVaYDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_272_1300717266.1437977237662"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_272_1300717266.1437977237662
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_273_1811397300.1437977237662"

------=_Part_273_1811397300.1437977237662
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Le lundi 27 juillet 2015 00:02:32 UTC, xorxes a =C3=A9crit :
>
>
>
> Why do I seem to be against it? I agree with Ilmen's expansions, and=20
> notice that he does have a prenex in a poi clause in one of the steps.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>

What Ilmen showed in the first formation is giving a model to the nested=20
{poi}-clause: that is a meta-linguistic formation mentioning truth value.=
=20
You said that the internal bound variables in {poi}-clause have nothing to=
=20
do with universe of discourse, and I thought you meant the truth value of=
=20
the internal bridi of {poi}-clause has nothing to do with the truth value=
=20
of the outer bridi. Then it is against the formation of Ilmen that connects=
=20
the truth value of inner and outer of {poi}-clause.=20

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_273_1811397300.1437977237662
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br>Le lundi 27 juillet 2015 00:02:32 UTC, xorxes a =
=C3=A9crit=C2=A0:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margi=
n-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir=3D"l=
tr"><br><div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div><div>Why do I s=
eem to be against it? I agree with Ilmen&#39;s expansions, and notice that =
he does have a prenex in a poi clause in one of the steps.</div><div><br></=
div><div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div></div><div><br></div></div></div></d=
iv></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>What Ilmen showed in the=
 first formation is giving a model to the nested {poi}-clause: that is a me=
ta-linguistic formation mentioning truth value. You said that the internal =
bound variables in {poi}-clause have nothing to do with universe of discour=
se, and I thought you meant the truth value of the internal bridi of {poi}-=
clause has nothing to do with the truth value of the outer bridi. Then it i=
s against the formation of Ilmen that connects the truth value of inner and=
 outer of {poi}-clause.=C2=A0</div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_273_1811397300.1437977237662--
------=_Part_272_1300717266.1437977237662--