Received: from mail-ig0-f191.google.com ([209.85.213.191]:33931) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLz4l-0008IF-QN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:44 -0700 Received: by igbqa2 with SMTP id qa2sf13140070igb.1 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=g2m+xgID/yww02oHTP+eghJvilVeSEFB/9jDanbaMmo=; b=R1kjsLrPnNu0ikEZrawwR4+2msV7SBMet9N0E+7FBlEdikdp8Y7e5ezKeaWnM6Kxm0 94LVMDoXVbKOwrtXHwajpveJMT9pjdycudhYwzp08YnepD+oxXXFXtvENhutodsuY6W5 LCPlsvlFJJEqhtV5D2GpU45NMgp3PHhEWplYVpdD+FDgQYiATsDEAbZJ236I39mKSN/0 BFcRH+KGv1Ed7j5YtwLfxV9rtMc/MH6ojPAHqaEKbRR3bjF7/xD0i85RNHFW7g5wizlh 3NLZceTdmhpn6x4MMkfVxjaYOAkVj9EabgrbAhUi8Yz3SbNMzi0U54wUmWErGeiIbd6E A9gg== X-Received: by 10.50.50.167 with SMTP id d7mr164745igo.10.1438544253810; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.92.67 with SMTP id ck3ls795852igb.34.canary; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.220.33 with SMTP id pt1mr13661091pac.15.1438544253383; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i67si983317ywg.1.2015.08.02.12.37.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a; Received: by qgii95 with SMTP id i95so76724027qgi.2 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.234.17 with SMTP id f17mr21661842qhc.94.1438544253185; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Alexs-MacBook-Air-2.local (c-68-82-39-90.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [68.82.39.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f71sm5683718qhe.7.2015.08.02.12.37.31 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Aug 2015 12:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 15:37:30 -0400 From: Alex Burka To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6e091cad-9454-41f1-965e-33f2650941dc@googlegroups.com> References: <1c2a3b64-07b1-4023-a740-362deb17da34@googlegroups.com> <6e091cad-9454-41f1-965e-33f2650941dc@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: xoi and new soi as bridi relative clause X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (309) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="55be717a_6ed8168d_140" X-Original-Sender: durka42@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=durka42@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --55be717a_6ed8168d_140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I much prefer a UI marker for [non-]restrictiveness. That unifies a lot of = stuff, providing a way to think about {ne} in terms of {pe}, {noi} in terms= of {poi}, etc and reduces cmavo proliferation (refer to the Cmavo Non-Prol= iferation Act of 2014, zo'o). And {ta'o} seems to fit. mu'o mi'e la durkavore On August 2, 2015 at 3:34:49 AM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) (spheniscine@gmail= .com) wrote: About Pxoi vs Nxoi: We *could* make say {ni'oi} Nxoi, while xoi =3D Pxoi (either that or assign= {pi'oi}, but I'm reluctant to use that cmavo space if we aren't gonna kill= {xoi}, which might be impossible to do at this point). On the other hand though, there might be a need for a UI to mark "non-restr= ictive" information, since {xoi} is proposed to be an expansion for {fi'o},= BAI, and sumtcita anyway. Thus this UI can then be useful to mark any sumt= cita place (or even, say, seltau) as incidental information. I *think* {ta'o} works for that purpose, but others might disagree. There's= also {ra'unai}, but I'm not sure if it's suitable, and I'd prefer an unneg= ated form because I believe that information should be considered restricti= ve by default. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/loj= ban/ylLq6Urt3N4/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+= unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --55be717a_6ed8168d_140 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =
I much prefer a UI marker for [non-]restrictivenes= s. That unifies a lot of stuff, providing a way to think about {ne} in term= s of {pe}, {noi} in terms of {poi}, etc and reduces cmavo proliferation (re= fer to the Cmavo Non-Proliferation Act of 2014, zo'o). And {ta'o} seems to = fit.

mu'o mi'e la durkavore

On August 2, 2015 at 3:34:49 AM, Spheniscine (la zi= pcpi) (spheniscine@gmail.com) = wrote:

About Pxoi vs Nxoi:

We *could* make say {ni'oi} Nxoi, while xoi =3D Pxoi (either that or assign {pi'oi}, but I'm reluctant to use that cmavo space if we aren't gonna kill {xoi}, which might be impossible to do at this point).

On the other hand though, there might be a need for a UI to mark "non-restrictive" information, since {xoi} is proposed to be an expansion for {fi'o}, BAI, and sumtcita anyway. Thus this UI can then be useful to mark any sumtcita place (or even, say, seltau) as incidental information.

I *think* {ta'o} works for that purpose, but others might disagree. There's also {ra'unai}, but I'm not sure if it's suitable, and I'd prefer an unnegated form because I believe that information should be considered restrictive by default.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/l= ojban/ylLq6Urt3N4/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@g= ooglegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http:= //groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--55be717a_6ed8168d_140--