Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Felipe Perez-Guevara <mperezguevara@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Cc: webmaster@kyleroucis.com
Message-Id: <af72515b-e868-4118-89f4-7ddef0a269ee@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BFCA946-8A58-446D-8C14-1D49A025DDE5@kyleroucis.com>
References: <f4395a54-63db-4982-8808-77b530ad251f@googlegroups.com>
 <3BFCA946-8A58-446D-8C14-1D49A025DDE5@kyleroucis.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban for research on human-machine interfaces
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_305_770744496.1438813096495"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_305_770744496.1438813096495
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_306_1775223168.1438813096495"

------=_Part_306_1775223168.1438813096495
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

First of all, Wei and Kyle thank you for your answers.

@Kyle I see the point about the grammar being unambiguous due to its 
parsing and the direct mapping between phonemes and graphemes also taking 
pronunciation ambiguity out. Nonetheless I refer to other aspects of the 
language or even the grammar itself in the sense of knowing how the 
different components were decided to stay like that. For example any sounds 
could have been selected to be the phonemes arbitrarily, before creating a 
nonambigous mapping to graphemes, or this phonemes could have been selected 
to maximize their auditory discrimination based on some sound variable or 
something like that. Also for example the grammar rules themselves must 
have a history due to loglan, but I just wondered if you could point me to 
some easy guide on the evolution of the grammatical rules selected.

In general I mean some material or maybe a person to contact that could 
introduce me to the path of creation of the language and not just to its 
final state.

It would be really nice if we could discuss this by voice/chat, thank you 
again for your guidance.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_306_1775223168.1438813096495
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">First of all, Wei and Kyle thank you for your answers.<div=
><br></div><div>@Kyle I see the point about the grammar being unambiguous d=
ue to its parsing and the direct mapping between phonemes and graphemes als=
o taking pronunciation ambiguity out. Nonetheless I refer to other aspects =
of the language or even the grammar itself in the sense of knowing how the =
different components were decided to stay like that. For example any sounds=
 could have been selected to be the phonemes arbitrarily, before creating a=
 nonambigous mapping to graphemes, or this phonemes could have been selecte=
d to maximize their auditory discrimination based on some sound variable or=
 something like that. Also for example the grammar rules themselves must ha=
ve a history due to loglan, but I just wondered if you could point me to so=
me easy guide on the evolution of the grammatical rules selected.</div><div=
><br></div><div>In general I mean some material or maybe a person to contac=
t that could introduce me to the path of creation of the language and not j=
ust to its final state.</div><div><br></div><div>It would be really nice if=
 we could discuss this by voice/chat, thank you again for your guidance.</d=
iv></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http:=
//groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_306_1775223168.1438813096495--
------=_Part_305_770744496.1438813096495--