Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236;
Message-ID: <55D4F29E.5090601@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:18:22 +0200
From: Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] {ri} and nested sumti
References: <1932439.3jtlRmv1Oj@caracal>
In-Reply-To: <1932439.3jtlRmv1Oj@caracal>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.7
X-Spam_score_int: -16
X-Spam_bar: -


On 19/08/2015 21:47, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> ni'o lo selbilma be fi la .tsarat. zo'u ko seljde zukte lo se ctuca be lo
> .elvita jdaca'i .i lo termi'e be ri bei mi cu seldje se zukte ko
>
> What is the antecedent of {ri}?
>
> Pierre
If I'm not mistaken, in the case of two or more nested sumti sharing the 
same termination point due to elided terminators, {ri} targets the most 
recently introduced one, so {lo .elvita jdaca'i} in this case. Please 
correct me if this is wrong or inaccurate.

Ilmen.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.