Received: from mail-qg0-f57.google.com ([209.85.192.57]:33512) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZWTXw-0000Tu-F5 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:18 -0700 Received: by qgeb6 with SMTP id b6sf33938271qge.0 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x_cmae_category:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=n3hmth89dPZnFfqpSCaLmNH+LHCnvivjd+CN8cSSjTA=; b=vEHDOZeifwMcYdcoGbWUIbVyFr1J2k33pwdcP9xEAOYafFkEUh7XvsBGNTQ5h0Rci7 FQJPIwMzoi+WKLep5CD0GIu00ZcPZjhGvyHjtnEt26224EIpDTMGKImLEY+xhUxUEAUl 8blFOlu3h4Ed/dp5k+fRpHzrl/dyOTlwFC2X+wrd7C5aEJcXilS2s7gwGtXDI+JqwKRn XURqcSt133P9NL/HwQy/I/OlR6fUDMFjb4EydWH6D0H72Pm7SaGl2LmsGWMfbFTy4IHn Ts/EcG9DfubBHxC0SXsqaY0BN0yjNQflr3axzAfm9bplr9uzDhjTwQF1x6Lo6A98sKZw hKYQ== X-Received: by 10.182.49.225 with SMTP id x1mr366255obn.16.1441044662501; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.53.164 with SMTP id c4ls3793302obp.9.gmail; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.13.196.6 with SMTP id g6mr5888639ywd.49.1441044662170; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.hughes.net (smtp.hughes.net. [69.168.97.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o7si1131880igp.1.2015.08.31.11.11.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.48; X-Authed-Username: cGhtYUBodWdoZXMubmV0 X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=L+4kHYj8 c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=tu8v4/BYpNWK47pT606GYA==:117 a=tu8v4/BYpNWK47pT606GYA==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=dWugZ8S5fIJjkYD8lzMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 173.95.140.180 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org) Received: from [173.95.140.180] ([173.95.140.180:57128] helo=bezitopo.org) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 8F/42-26404-5B894E55; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:11:01 -0400 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B5E5988 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:11:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] seca'o Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:10:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1618046.L1WxyscUVr@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-62-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <16379753.h0Xzzxiggv@caracal> <1655146.arRor6IsMZ@caracal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mailfrom=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_bar: -- On Monday, August 31, 2015 19:13:21 Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > The previous constucts were proposed expansions of TAhE. >=20 > I don't think I can immediately understand which features tense markers > must possess to be called tenses (not being able to take SE, not being ab= le > to work as sumtcita?) but >=20 > what I can say that your question isn't relevant to the notion of "tense > marker" in general but to Lojbanic understanding of it. So any new brivla > (hopefully not cimjvo invading jvajvo space) would do. Tense is a grammatical thing. Most languages, including Lojban, have tense.= =20 English has a synthetic past tense marked by "-ed" in weak verbs and vowel= =20 changes in strong verbs, and several analytic tenses, but no separate tense= =20 markers. Chickasaw has a tense marker "tok". Tok Pisin has tense markers "b= in"=20 and "bai" and auxiliary verbs "stap" and "pinis". (Wiktionary calls them al= l=20 tense markers, but the last two are verbs in their own right.) What exactly= is=20 a tense marker has to be figured out for each language, and a particular wo= rd=20 may change from an auxiliary to a tense marker. In Lojban, the syntactic difference is that tense markers cannot be convert= ed=20 with SE. Both tense markers (many selma'o) and proper prepositions (BAI) ca= n=20 be used as prepositions. The word I'm looking for is one for the general notion of grammatical tense= ,=20 including Lojban spatial tenses. Pierre --=20 La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre. Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.