Received: from mail-vk0-f58.google.com ([209.85.213.58]:34291) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZ0ui-0003cg-IQ for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:12 -0700 Received: by vkaw128 with SMTP id w128sf16162253vka.1 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=58fg/BqFlCqNilACC9tmEzMrMoptjB8ixBVg5bcKVIM=; b=RDOA6ylTwqtMQZSyg5oguNfZZrMaQPnoIcprIZa0BqNsmFGxmyi3B89iq1HBeaM0oB jAEUNnuqIWP4sGM61YOYPTFagG+gADvQwPgKIuc1Pfi8LV82yNzcLkl9hz+pa2BIg/5W Qz4ev9SsgD4v9dxyEe8KYpE3/6lgOq6+ZmQkSojByuLTFNWz0Nc3kYAP4Ib99OHiz9+h /dfGfMgL4IVZZnqcsbG8SQswwUIWGyj0R9LojvBN0yoLZbo6vWck9bZzWnW5x2zKxiRJ 7Ij43SZcZdIGkXjqsXFvUZ2Ik7qruzENMoGnqn+JG2Jty3uJI5KcMAg0coln11QoNEkG lSfQ== X-Received: by 10.182.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr81759obl.26.1441649582596; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.101.170 with SMTP id fh10ls1752280obb.91.gmail; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.126.166 with SMTP id mz6mr20262428obb.18.1441649582264; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jerrington.me (jerrington.me. [192.99.166.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d81si30817ywb.7.2015.09.07.11.13.02 for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tsani@mail.jerrington.me designates 192.99.166.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.99.166.45; Message-Id: <55edd3ae.544f810a.31d55.022bSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@gmr-mx.google.com> Received: from [10.0.0.192] (unknown [24.140.235.92]) by jerrington.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6945F143C77 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:44:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] seca'o From: Jacob Thomas Errington To: lojban@googlegroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Original-Sender: tsani@mail.jerrington.me X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tsani@mail.jerrington.me designates 192.99.166.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tsani@mail.jerrington.me Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.5 X-Spam_score_int: 15 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Aug 31, 2015 8:30 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > One of the questions added yesterday has the answer "seca'o". As far as I'm > aware, this is ungrammatical; members of BAI may be converted with SE, which > is equivalent to converting the corresponding brivla, but tense markers > cannot. > [...] Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 3.4 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.213.58 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER Message-Id was added by a relay On Aug 31, 2015 8:30 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > One of the questions added yesterday has the answer "seca'o". As far as I'm > aware, this is ungrammatical; members of BAI may be converted with SE, which > is equivalent to converting the corresponding brivla, but tense markers > cannot. > Under the unified tags proposal, all of TAG gets the same, flat grammar. This is akin to the removal of the internal grammar of PA, which was widely considered a Good Move. In this model, all tags may be converted with SE. See https://mw.lojban.org/papri/internal_grammar_of_tags > Related question: what is the Lojban for "tense" in the grammar sense, > including spatial tenses? > > Pierre > -- > Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.