Received: from mail-oi0-f63.google.com ([209.85.218.63]:34472) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZlH8Z-0003Zl-9c for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:11 -0700 Received: by oiao187 with SMTP id o187sf4844438oia.1 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x_cmae_category:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=WapMFZyII+FgUov0OCLRGyCWm2yvlxC3y/sAuo5koSs=; b=iGytH4S6p9by33m/L9CmmtBLGXk6m0IGtGWZcD5Y+P/QnuAe27P12y9a/lmG1Miccs +5S2XdrBGJPiMPRLTESCg3nH9DCYOPuxP0309pbWmrClmVDQxYJNfqlKWGP/DfYRM1Vg Sa1WhfKNaQtAL/uYk5Sdqe6v6ZUQpeURCeyt36fioKEbi5WXAFbl3palK//sh4HWcCL+ r2F/YPvvFB/aATrBaNl74eGDHUwWymwg6zHpJYriuRxasPOLZdLzKBcd2ER+1hSTvUxm 5qa1clbbFHrBk1VVsMU5QmhEtdy7HylktNHEuJLIlWVndP5p0uxKVYqzi5zNzNnIg+T+ f+Mg== X-Received: by 10.140.92.144 with SMTP id b16mr5366qge.34.1444571881379; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.16.198 with SMTP id 64ls2312452qgb.52.gmail; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.129.108.133 with SMTP id h127mr19238216ywc.8.1444571880747; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.hughes.net (smtp.hughes.net. [69.168.97.48]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rr9si385374igb.1.2015.10.11.06.58.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.48; X-Authed-Username: cGhtYUBodWdoZXMubmV0 X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=RaupVTdv c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=tu8v4/BYpNWK47pT606GYA==:117 a=tu8v4/BYpNWK47pT606GYA==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=5lJygRwiOn0A:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=ISJgrlqZAAAA:8 a=NEoxnqiR8xjV4wwAxiYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=GyChumwFdrUA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 173.95.140.180 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org) Received: from [173.95.140.180] ([173.95.140.180:60395] helo=bezitopo.org) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id EF/35-28150-8EA6A165; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:58:00 -0400 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C961ACB for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:57:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CLLv1.1 goes out on Monday, 12 Oct 2015 Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:57:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3866214.9joFFaomEp@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-65-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20151010033327.GC13991@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mailfrom=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - On Sunday, October 11, 2015 12:31:29 Timothy Lawrence wrote: > I have been briefly reviewing the CLL version at > http://vrici.lojban.org/~rlpowell/media/public/cll_nochunks_2015-10-05/#s= ec > tion-pronunciation >=20 > The main feedback I have is to be sure that its suggestion of pronunciati= on > is correct, especially for "o". >=20 > The text seems to make assumptions about the reader's dialect of English. > The section on pronunciation says "o as in =E2=80=9Cdome=E2=80=9D" but my= dialect of English > pronounces "dome" as http://howjsay.com/index.php?word=3Ddome&submit=3DSu= bmit > (i.e. a diphthong, which is incorrect). This may result in many readers > learning the wrong pronunciation of Lojban. >=20 > I mentioned this issue also existing in the "Level 0 Booklet" publication= in > my "Pronunciation of "o"" email to the lojban-beginners group. There must > be a better example word that has the correct "o" for all dialects of > English. I don't think there is. In my idiolect, which is a mix of different America= n=20 dialects without the cot-caught merger, /o/ is diphthongized except before= =20 /r/, /=C9=94/ is distinct, and /o/ and /=C9=92/ contrast except before /r/.= Rhotic=20 speakers may have trouble separating /o/ from following /r/. Non-rhotic=20 dialects do something different with /or/. Pierre --=20 li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.