Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.217 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.217;
Subject: Re: [lojban] Marking sentence completion | ka sinxa lo du'u lo jufra
 cu mulno
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <gmc51r00l3zHed501mc7nv>
 <7.0.1.0.2.20151112081952.032e54c8@cox.net> <56464115.5080309@gmail.com>
 <hKak1r00756Cr6M01KalrH>
From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc.
Message-ID: <56475EA8.7060707@lojban.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:17:44 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <hKak1r00756Cr6M01KalrH>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

On 11/14/2015 2:34 AM, Spheniscine (la zipcpi) wrote:
> Interesting question. I do wonder though, whether {mu'o} is that useful
> in COI for this case. How often does one actually need to address a
> specific person for something that just acts like radio-com "over"?


If you are multiple conversations, and it is necessary to know which 
conversation is terminating.

Consider the formal protocols of air traffic control (which we did) as a 
major test case.

lojbab

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.