Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:02:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Rui Liu <edenish.fallen@gmail.com>
To: lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <60fe9dc4-211d-4025-a120-4ca1b7220215@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151212021849.4edc12ba@W5.localdomain>
References: <57fc2430-e84d-4efd-8eb5-2a5fde8fbf38@googlegroups.com>
 <20151212021849.4edc12ba@W5.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Question about tanru and lujvo invention
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_2887_1869015712.1449889368073"
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

------=_Part_2887_1869015712.1449889368073
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_2888_775913522.1449889368074"

------=_Part_2888_775913522.1449889368074
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you very much for your reply!

I wonder if there's way to express exactly one metaphorical meaning but=20
without using lujvo. For example, in English 'ace in the hole' has special=
=20
meaning, however I suppose such a rather complex idiom should better not be=
=20
made into a single word lujvo.

Sorry about keep doubting on this problem. When I tell people around me=20
that I'm learning lojban, and introduce some of its concepts to them, the=
=20
common reaction is usually 'Isn't it too rigid compared with natural=20
language?' or 'Can artistic literature be created with it, without feeling=
=20
like some text under rules?' or 'Won't it be so regular that some beauty is=
=20
lost?'. Actually these are also some questions I want to ask. A list of a=
=20
thousand cmavo for merely grammatical use seems that the language focuses=
=20
too much on grammar. (Maybe it's the cost of syntax unambiguity?)

I understand that these questions are raised due to a conventional=20
impression on 'logical language' which are not pondered over deeply and=20
thoroughly. Even though I carefully pick up the most delicate sentence I=20
can find in literature, it's still under the grammar of that language in=20
which the sentence is written. That makes me think maybe grammar doesn't=20
actually constrain semantics as much as I used to feel. But I'm not quite=
=20
sure about that.

The doubt probably won't be dispelled until I actually see some creative=20
text originally written in lojban to convince me enough. I noticed there's=
=20
translation for Alice. My current lojban skills still can't support me to=
=20
read it, so I will keep on learning and come back to see this question.

Yet another question, how are gismu semantics be chosen? i.e. How to=20
determine if a certain meaning is 'basic enough'?

And finally, thanks again for answering my beginner question!

On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 1:18:58 AM UTC, Wuzzy wrote:
>
> Since I think nobody actually answered the questions but just babbled=20
> around it, I'll answer them.=20
>
> > For example, cadzu mroxadni (walking corpse) can mean zombie, but=20
> > also (more artistically) someone who's not living a meaningful life.=20
> > For me, both of the meanings are interesting, it seems a pity to lose=
=20
> > either of it.=20
> You don't =E2=80=9Close=E2=80=9D one or the other meaning by creating a l=
ujvo, because=20
> you can always create another lujvo, but the other lujvo must be based=20
> on a different tanru.=20
> So the second meaning is not lost, it is just differently expressed.=20
>
> > So I wonder is there some way to record both concepts down?=20
> Yes. Of course it is possible to pin down both concepts. You do this by=
=20
> using lujvo built from different tanru.=20
>
> As for your example, the second meaning sounds very metaphorically, so=20
> I would throw a =E2=80=9Cpe'a=E2=80=9D into it; =E2=80=9Cpe'a=E2=80=9D ha=
s a rafsi, so you could build=20
> a lujvo like =E2=80=9Cpevdzumroxadni=E2=80=9D for the methaphor.=20
>
> > More=20
> > generally, how to assign different "shortcuts" (like lujvo) to=20
> > different meanings of a single tanru?=20
> This is not possible without breaking the rules of Lojban.=20
> As you have said, a lujvo represents a single meaning of the many=20
> possible interpretations of a tanru.=20
>
> That way, you can be sure that =E2=80=9Cgerzda=E2=80=9D simply means =E2=
=80=9Cdog house=E2=80=9D and=20
> not something far-fetched, like a house which looks like a dog (which=20
> could be one of many possible interpretations of =E2=80=9Cgerku zdani=E2=
=80=9D). ;-)=20
>
> The general rule is simply: 1 lujvo =3D 1 meaning.=20
>
> But what you could try is try to kinda work around this. If you really=20
> think a tanru has two equally =E2=80=9Cimportant=E2=80=9D meanings, try t=
o make a=20
> slight variation. For your second meaning, alter a word or two. Or=20
> maybe throw in some cmavo (like =E2=80=9Cpe'a=E2=80=9D if you are using a=
 metaphor).=20
>
> --=20
> Wuzzy=20
> XMPP: Wuz...@jabber.ccc.de <javascript:>=20
> E-Mail: wuz...@mail.ru <javascript:>=20
>

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

------=_Part_2888_775913522.1449889368074
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Thank you very much for your reply!<div><br></div><div>I w=
onder if there&#39;s way to express exactly one metaphorical meaning but wi=
thout using lujvo. For example, in English &#39;ace in the hole&#39; has sp=
ecial meaning, however I suppose such a rather complex idiom should better =
not be made into a single word lujvo.</div><div><br></div><div>Sorry about =
keep doubting on this problem. When I tell people around me that I&#39;m le=
arning lojban, and introduce some of its concepts to them, the common react=
ion is usually &#39;Isn&#39;t it too rigid compared with natural language?&=
#39; or &#39;Can artistic literature be created with it, without feeling li=
ke some text under rules?&#39; or &#39;Won&#39;t it be so regular that some=
 beauty is lost?&#39;. Actually these are also some questions I want to ask=
. A list of a thousand cmavo for merely grammatical use seems that the lang=
uage focuses too much on grammar. (Maybe it&#39;s the cost of syntax unambi=
guity?)</div><div><br></div><div>I understand that these questions are rais=
ed due to a conventional impression on &#39;logical language&#39; which are=
 not pondered over deeply and thoroughly. Even though I carefully pick up t=
he most delicate sentence I can find in literature, it&#39;s still under th=
e grammar of that language in which the sentence is written. That makes me =
think maybe grammar doesn&#39;t actually constrain semantics as much as I u=
sed to feel. But I&#39;m not quite sure about that.</div><div><br></div><di=
v>The doubt probably won&#39;t be dispelled until I actually see some creat=
ive text originally written in lojban to convince me enough. I noticed ther=
e&#39;s translation for Alice. My current lojban skills still can&#39;t sup=
port me to read it, so I will keep on learning and come back to see this qu=
estion.</div><div><br></div><div>Yet another question, how are gismu semant=
ics be chosen? i.e. How to determine if a certain meaning is &#39;basic eno=
ugh&#39;?</div><div><br></div><div>And finally, thanks again for answering =
my beginner question!<br><br>On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 1:18:58 AM U=
TC, Wuzzy wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin=
-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Since I think =
nobody actually answered the questions but just babbled
<br>around it, I&#39;ll answer them.
<br>
<br>&gt; For example, cadzu mroxadni (walking corpse) can mean zombie, but
<br>&gt; also (more artistically) someone who&#39;s not living a meaningful=
 life.
<br>&gt; For me, both of the meanings are interesting, it seems a pity to l=
ose
<br>&gt; either of it.
<br>You don&#39;t =E2=80=9Close=E2=80=9D one or the other meaning by creati=
ng a lujvo, because
<br>you can always create another lujvo, but the other lujvo must be based
<br>on a different tanru.
<br>So the second meaning is not lost, it is just differently expressed.
<br>
<br>&gt; So I wonder is there some way to record both concepts down?
<br>Yes. Of course it is possible to pin down both concepts. You do this by
<br>using lujvo built from different tanru.
<br>
<br>As for your example, the second meaning sounds very metaphorically, so
<br>I would throw a =E2=80=9Cpe&#39;a=E2=80=9D into it; =E2=80=9Cpe&#39;a=
=E2=80=9D has a rafsi, so you could build
<br>a lujvo like =E2=80=9Cpevdzumroxadni=E2=80=9D for the methaphor.
<br>
<br>&gt; More
<br>&gt; generally, how to assign different &quot;shortcuts&quot; (like luj=
vo) to
<br>&gt; different meanings of a single tanru?
<br>This is not possible without breaking the rules of Lojban.
<br>As you have said, a lujvo represents a single meaning of the many
<br>possible interpretations of a tanru.
<br>
<br>That way, you can be sure that =E2=80=9Cgerzda=E2=80=9D simply means =
=E2=80=9Cdog house=E2=80=9D and
<br>not something far-fetched, like a house which looks like a dog (which
<br>could be one of many possible interpretations of =E2=80=9Cgerku zdani=
=E2=80=9D). ;-)
<br>
<br>The general rule is simply: 1 lujvo =3D 1 meaning.
<br>
<br>But what you could try is try to kinda work around this. If you really
<br>think a tanru has two equally =E2=80=9Cimportant=E2=80=9D meanings, try=
 to make a
<br>slight variation. For your second meaning, alter a word or two. Or
<br>maybe throw in some cmavo (like =E2=80=9Cpe&#39;a=E2=80=9D if you are u=
sing a metaphor).
<br>
<br>--=20
<br>Wuzzy
<br>XMPP: <a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=
=3D"qGDAtRA0CwAJ" rel=3D"nofollow" onmousedown=3D"this.href=3D&#39;javascri=
pt:&#39;;return true;" onclick=3D"this.href=3D&#39;javascript:&#39;;return =
true;">Wuz...@jabber.ccc.de</a>
<br>E-Mail: <a href=3D"javascript:" target=3D"_blank" gdf-obfuscated-mailto=
=3D"qGDAtRA0CwAJ" rel=3D"nofollow" onmousedown=3D"this.href=3D&#39;javascri=
pt:&#39;;return true;" onclick=3D"this.href=3D&#39;javascript:&#39;;return =
true;">wuz...@mail.ru</a>
<br></blockquote></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;lojban&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">lojban+unsub=
scribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:lojban@googlegroups.=
com">lojban@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/group/lojban">http=
s://groups.google.com/group/lojban</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

------=_Part_2888_775913522.1449889368074--
------=_Part_2887_1869015712.1449889368073--