Received: from mail-pf0-f189.google.com ([209.85.192.189]:33706) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aNt7x-0000jA-BY for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:13:08 -0800 Received: by mail-pf0-f189.google.com with SMTP id q63sf42576690pfb.0 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:13:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OjJ/sqJgj76Pykr+SxvGjL2UmkD39MHtoLLIJX0JsP0=; b=vR7U6rKQG5rjVrZ7jvPkn1lj2WsgvtOrpy/PXPKfdwgWfv2t6CgKwKmHHkjkEN8CYB FEJKcEgTp4ersOHlMX/X/FQP+7C/xavBHamTFYVbZUKeOmeWvXfqF0UE9S2a/98+CgmL UQfADMhQxMvHjULb58Qh8xodufMR2wFjXwTwSJa4KNXd7TkFTfTbfoD76tWq1KnkKu82 ZkIudkbaR8iQNCrCj4fbqFzOO4IG8eudMwNX3ckf4kYAAxNN/6dyC6cQI3fZlddhrmPg okHWWPvyJUzB00VQRmC0DEnzZ6+Jgl8xbT+rLnWvH5ZbYC2et1xYLr3AxTH2LJpoPHyi QMDw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OjJ/sqJgj76Pykr+SxvGjL2UmkD39MHtoLLIJX0JsP0=; b=b669zgDaMlGcpryWSaFx8P/QYYTUsPQGN4OcXEQXP01Eh7mWPq2YxcxX/ikEDX+A9I +PGz9z2UyhMxQszPnsmLlbPa095VaC04YCD6Cxj7owAkc1vrqqGDJKsGZ5MdNRHoui2P Yw2JmXSeD1mWWrDkj5n0g4hSS7yDSl1wX/msRs13d0jYhkH1wTzgn3XeW5VYxrzDCvfm +AbzFUH2ZvcBsy2s4IjW6T9r/5QIH62XjTE4ZivMR5u+ki9ZG8B8JZ3U4YFvtgy+BK1x FQ68E0A/6a6T8ITh7qYWLb69+4WGZ8rfkkCAY/LNhMYcL9QrIJjVQiV6GZu7/bwmhIz0 yuWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=OjJ/sqJgj76Pykr+SxvGjL2UmkD39MHtoLLIJX0JsP0=; b=kCaMBGeHnkzmTcSv47mcUMAC5cKP0YCx67yLizDBIsQBb4iZBGKvecN/ZKN+s98gs0 a8OWJZXrjMEI7pY3CNRtAJvf5XKxDPv6PuKeQwjO6CBRrcEu+QCPfGB+Twx729QDDWfj H/CXcykNZdc1s/M8vYNMahj0hMZ8F3Ie0ts1jWmJI82J4Sor0vnOoyxZ7Z1xfz3Nhxc5 FAVu1qWAsHEcfK7OMb2wdA4oGYoYP1qgN3Gp9iZLdZ2HtiLB2a3GX4G/htkx/rpu67bU ehD6VJzAQ4+QChe7ikNS7gQvphK+MUHRw2cChpWeY8LNSjRbImPyKzAGa0bs0ekQ4yaC 8eqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQX6Hjl1Gsal0hHfkjy/oKWG9canG7XLT+HANjInTuA/aL6ZQlb+WoaUndlGEnGmA== X-Received: by 10.140.94.23 with SMTP id f23mr358458qge.9.1453774379592; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:12:59 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.40.164 with SMTP id x33ls102855qgx.8.gmail; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:12:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.104.15 with SMTP id z15mr357622qge.19.1453774378917; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:12:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:12:58 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew To: lojban Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <56A51A50.7030306@gmx.de> References: <6f919681-f16c-4888-aa5a-30518a717c12@googlegroups.com> <569F85BF.8030909@gmx.de> <8805e2d3-4389-460c-9e5b-b0d5194da1c2@googlegroups.com> <56A51A50.7030306@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] {cukta} as a case study for why the dictionary needs clearer, more detailed entries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_5429_561110321.1453774378487" X-Original-Sender: summerfallsaway@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_5429_561110321.1453774378487 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5430_1121044215.1453774378488" ------=_Part_5430_1121044215.1453774378488 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 mungojelly / selckiku wrote: I just want you to think of the plain numbers: A few words a week is 150ish > a year, or a DECADE LONG PROJECT to clarify the meanings of the original > gismu... > > (Also new words are being introduced at a rate faster than that, so if the > goal were to eventually get to all of the words and not just the ancient > gismu we'd actually be losing ground.) Probably the first step, then, should be to enforce the definition template for all new words. Currently, I believe, the web form for entering new lujvo into la jbovlaste encourages notes about the meanings of each sumti, but it doesn't *require* it. If all new words suddenly had to fill in this more complete template, it would assure that we have a finite number of words to review. On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 10:39:14 AM UTC-8, selpa'i wrote: > > la .cemjig. cu skuna si cusku di'e > > 4. a process be established to revise a few words (5+) every week to > > 100% completion of the template, with the view of geometrically > > progressing to more words per week as the project gains traction and > > helpers. > > The original plan was that there be two kinds of proposal/changes: > global and non-global. Global proposals concern lots of gismu at once > because they are about patterns and general things that need to or could > be done to the gimste. For example, "Remove all 'under conditions' > places", if agreed upon, would deal with a few hundred gismu at once. > > In any case, if the goal is consistency, then certain decisions can be > made more quickly than if every single gismu and every single gismu > place has to be considered on a case-by-case basis and isolated from the > rest (of course, a case-by-case analysis will still be necessary, but > the decisions become much easier to make, pe'i). > > mi'e la selpa'i > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_5430_1121044215.1453774378488 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
mungojelly / selckiku wrote:

I just want you to think of the plain numbers: A few words a week is 150ish a year, or a DECADE LONG PROJECT to clarify the meanings of the original gismu...

(Also new words are being introduced at a rate faster than that, so if the goal were to eventually get to all of the words and not just the ancien= t gismu we'd actually be losing ground.)

Probably the first step, then, should be to enforce the de= finition template for all new words. Currently, I believe, the web form for= entering new lujvo into la jbovlaste encourages notes about the meanings o= f each sumti, but it doesn't require it. If all new words sudden= ly had to fill in this more complete template, it would assure that we have= a finite number of words to review.


On Sunday, January 24, 2016= at 10:39:14 AM UTC-8, selpa'i wrote:
la .cemjig. cu skuna si cusku di'e
> 4. a process be established to revise a few words (5+) every week = to
> 100% completion of the template, with the view of geometrically
> progressing to more words per week as the project gains traction a= nd
> helpers.

The original plan was that there be two kinds of proposal/changes:=20
global and non-global. Global proposals concern lots of gismu at once= =20
because they are about patterns and general things that need to or coul= d=20
be done to the gimste. For example, "Remove all 'under conditi= ons'=20
places", if agreed upon, would deal with a few hundred gismu at on= ce.

In any case, if the goal is consistency, then certain decisions can be= =20
made more quickly than if every single gismu and every single gismu=20
place has to be considered on a case-by-case basis and isolated from th= e=20
rest (of course, a case-by-case analysis will still be necessary, but= =20
the decisions become much easier to make, pe'i).

mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_5430_1121044215.1453774378488-- ------=_Part_5429_561110321.1453774378487--