Received: from mail-lf0-f62.google.com ([209.85.215.62]:34667) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1b3qcZ-0006sH-6z for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:02:15 -0700 Received: by mail-lf0-f62.google.com with SMTP id m64sf8205058lfd.1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Y6NHKz4/XJPqnM/ENN0hNvTS4BlNE/I6/nDSdw4W9So=; b=MgaaZD3DtEnoqF06g/ta2FX5sqFZBcV4+KWcRr2NwO+JXCP/EhbYEqkDVJFEEVGqHz +UCX48oQGae0L85q3pagfhBuDueoyaLMEyaZ/44eBbwAUChJt1u5JR772OEItuJkp7yF s0N4+EuwE2TK6ij3si0Vt40tUuYNh8yJ1WbgMHVsIwBAcFuSYA1lqh+DnSXeMIBH+8ve Tx0De/0DDXOdoOrN4lR86KPiQKSW9/4kmzjQBmNNGHyMCP0DOXqGKPmSRHL3a3U1mT40 nnxbQRxmSc1ttxhf1Mpmd6BZ1tMnZzRGSjbEvIfvt5u3NNyl5eCZR4/P0SV8J4o6/Wfi i8mw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Y6NHKz4/XJPqnM/ENN0hNvTS4BlNE/I6/nDSdw4W9So=; b=UNRzzx6i9Xv+2FkOmbPLRauatMAJsXUBYuwvN0xSMH62w04N+WAjJPy+G8/LvPe6R7 II+m1SBc2TiHIZtL+F7Mj07yJc7RlVG1norajuotRIFEFd2f0xtjyHvJ+/5zkR86pXya a7QAKxyfcx/lvjpSdxjTzMpgE0BFewaBF1H7AbcZQ4uTgVyMDo+OGnhdWvUQQ5n9Wi8Q GMv5pariBIbmymiFM8a3EHveGAUVNRwWybwrTHN933ZVSqHhPnDlBzo3PmC954OMc002 mFsRIdi4e06t+wD7Mexq66HjLc6et8JawA7Z1exHJqbA1yIMCXaT/K3GwnHjwFLIzEde tA0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Y6NHKz4/XJPqnM/ENN0hNvTS4BlNE/I6/nDSdw4W9So=; b=HLsOlBCbtF5o2w63gqf5yOx+Nm7yiNqIiH1mgT8EQfkJjaVpPFMVXl0S8D/IbvpxWH jIAGx9+PYNZcigd1kVz7LaaJl85gRX94qjncabQEgJPqbgRcDHoli+jxVsbxFEaMakvu RtWMj8EMBpOAh6bjCMYs62NEM3kTtaouM0AotfdZ/qRH4Pq/Rt5nV96VOc2l4jMerg+H MnJ4J1li/WWFc3kiyvnqJcLE1VN9UEAu8NstWJX14gqwEi6s/2IR5FINy8dlgRJQkl6K l5orbTIcvhJ/tlZddVxgD2+MKwAGW+1DwLJAlGj5Hgcgt77aJXBRbSFDZmx6qOako+4/ 9KYw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWLlw0Nt6pgLNEvEdxrzJqYqi3kwnkC1V9l1lIvPvOEXom7DhHRNAaQ+oJ21fCSzg== X-Received: by 10.25.25.211 with SMTP id 202mr52408lfz.16.1463774520334; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:02:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.25.81.146 with SMTP id f140ls111317lfb.80.gmail; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.157.199 with SMTP id g190mr581599lfe.4.1463774519695; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ai9si926604lbc.2.2016.05.20.13.01.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a; Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e126so28101548lfg.2 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.64.212 with SMTP id n203mr1895973lfa.54.1463774519450; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.65.2 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:01:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 22:01:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] Re: a thing or two about the Crash Course From: Bruno Panasiewicz To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fc26a43647105334b90ae X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a113fc26a43647105334b90ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 20 May 2016 at 21:22, Bruno Panasiewicz wrote: > Hello there, > I'm genuinely offended by that the Crash Course's resources are not > properly marked. > > To elaborate: > =E2=80=8B Let'=E2=80=8Bs be honest: I've called this mail 'a thing or two = about the Crash Course', then I've said 'elaborating', and sudden=E2=80=8Bly it's almost 50= 0 words (yes, I've run "wc -w"). Anyway. > the course is not a single page and, as you can guess, produces a lot of > topics not quite parallel, or even relevant to it. Also, the contents > describe an unofficial variation on the theme of official (BPFK) Lojban, > containing many experimental cmavo, selma'o and constructions. Now, there > are many dialects of Lojban extant, and they all appear on the wiki. This > means that such dialects should be marked off by a template or warning at > the top of a page. Yet many, if not most of the CC's pages don't warn the > reader this way. It is important to do so, as it doesn't confuse that > reader into thinking some construct is official while it isn't. There are > many solutions to this problem. > > The first one is defining what a "modern dialect of Lojban" as taught b= y > CC is, by the community itself. For example: is the selpa'i 's JE model > counted? Is {xoi} in it? One could ask such questions night-long, and > wouldn't get a brick solid answer. So why not capture it? Then we're only= a > template away from victory! > > (A rationale for such a thing: at any point, gleki can add {moi'i'au'e} > of ME (=E2=80=9Dx1 is a fish swimming in patterns [sumti]"), declare it a= s the > modern dialect, and suddenly a new army of nintadni would flush the jbogu= 'e > talking about the peculiar swimming patterns of salmon. Now that's what I > call evil! In order to avoid such silliness, a list of accepted > experimental stuff would form, and no such personal mix-and-match morphin= g > of the language of unaware learners would occur.) > > The second one is to put guns on BPFK's members' cheeks and make them > mainstream the new usage proposals... ah, forget it. > =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B > > The real second one is to remove the whole CC from the wiki. This way, > no one will be concerned about viewing random pages on the wiki and > thinking they are in official Lojban while they aren't. Simple, right? > > The third one is to do the following: for every nonstandard usage or > word, add a warning about it, link to a relevant page and show the offici= al > version. Suddenly we don't get any of the problems we've experienced befo= re! > > The fourth one is to stop that stupid marking and consider every dialec= t > to be Lojban. This would include lo geirbau and lo cu'u banzu frica be le > jbobau ku ku xo'o. > > What would YOU do? I think that not doing any of these would be an > offense from gleki's side, so some of these should be done. Feel free to > discuss it here, or fork the thread, if you feel like you're splitting ha= ir > in two and talking about one half only. > > =E2=80=94 mu'o > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a113fc26a43647105334b90ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 20 May 2016 at 21:22, Bruno Panasiewicz <ciuak.prog@gmail.com> wrote:

=C2=A0 Hello there,
I'm genuinely offended by that the Crash Course's resources are not= properly marked.

=C2=A0 To elaborate:

=E2=80=8B=C2=A0 Let'=E2=80=8Bs be honest: I've cal= led this mail 'a thing or two about the Crash Course', then I'v= e said 'elaborating', and sudden=E2=80=8Bly it's almost 500 wor= ds (yes, I've run "wc -w"). Anyway.

the course is not a single page and, as= you can guess, produces a lot of topics not quite parallel, or even releva= nt to it. Also, the contents describe an unofficial variation on the theme = of official (BPFK) Lojban, containing many experimental cmavo, selma'o = and constructions. Now, there are many dialects of Lojban extant, and they = all appear on the wiki. This means that such dialects should be marked off = by a template or warning at the top of a page. Yet many, if not most of the= CC's pages don't warn the reader this way. It is important to do s= o, as it doesn't confuse that reader into thinking some construct is of= ficial while it isn't. There are many solutions to this problem.

=C2=A0 The first one is defining what a "modern dialect= of Lojban" as taught by CC is, by the community itself. For example: = is the selpa'i 's JE model counted? Is {xoi} in it? One could ask s= uch questions night-long, and wouldn't get a brick solid answer. So why= not capture it? Then we're only a template away from victory!

=C2=A0 (A rationale for such a thing: at any point, gleki ca= n add {moi'i'au'e} of ME (=E2=80=9Dx1 is a fish swimming in pat= terns [sumti]"), declare it as the modern dialect, and suddenly a new = army of nintadni would flush the jbogu'e talking about the peculiar swi= mming patterns of salmon. Now that's what I call evil! In order to avoi= d such silliness, a list of accepted experimental stuff would form, and no = such personal mix-and-match morphing of the language of unaware learners wo= uld occur.)

=C2=A0 The second one is to put guns on BPFK's members&#= 39; cheeks and make them mainstream the new usage proposals... ah, forget i= t.

=E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B

=C2=A0 The real second one is to remove the whole CC from th= e wiki. This way, no one will be concerned about viewing random pages on th= e wiki and thinking they are in official Lojban while they aren't. Simp= le, right?

=C2=A0 The third one is to do the following: for every nonst= andard usage or word, add a warning about it, link to a relevant page and s= how the official version. Suddenly we don't get any of the problems we&= #39;ve experienced before!

=C2=A0 The fourth one is to stop that stupid marking and con= sider every dialect to be Lojban. This would include lo geirbau and lo cu&#= 39;u banzu frica be le jbobau ku ku xo'o.

=C2=A0 What would YOU do? I think that not doing any of thes= e would be an offense from gleki's side, so some of these should be don= e. Feel free to discuss it here, or fork the thread, if you feel like you&#= 39;re splitting hair in two and talking about one half only.

=E2=80=94 mu'o


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a113fc26a43647105334b90ae--