Received: from mail-wm0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:33646) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bNauN-0006Fz-Iy for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:13 -0700 Received: by mail-wm0-f61.google.com with SMTP id i5sf12710218wmg.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=xy2grrFN9wGKVhsZucRk08kgquICk/WwU9mcyQAQrf8=; b=JjwKIyPHGFah5kIryj3jEv3ISXyVJYbGYCp+N4wsJCeF2+Zeg/i6LqVQNc6ao1s3O1 OXgOzKzDdGHlkSy1CZHKHZb2PY4N9ipdH+vFWNbJnlHin7SWB9Vmp+2tZ0zSpyHhNgLU Y4i/YqAtlip1eSr1KtWaCFoNO5aOtylYKxu7/LniFWH0cFGswH7BB12sRnYdUDh8kiyo FOGoGMu5Y0iKoF7+yT8FZq9uGOLLIEbxjLKTpMrVavQz8EsDh+JLcJq6Fw7m0OAuygFT RzGw0d4kBbaMeQUfwo0+AgXCzOKLH/z94u/bUlTbypKlnHYnEwk0MD7OLDaieNCHmdje FwlA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=xy2grrFN9wGKVhsZucRk08kgquICk/WwU9mcyQAQrf8=; b=wrkYQ1Synh8JoalOtPEbrYbvpm6zhXa5mdtQJ/u+E+GnEbx4bp+hckHstNSTQNgmWO j2vE8cVeMZKFWHBG/86CaIpsI+ikOG+8hlycRmYEL4z9UTMLmEJvqqTJtc26cAiFxINr BZyqliBqhX2e2rekW+am+0x+HkYwqwlxvwIEk1Q7ek89ZCi6Xgtfb438RmMFg3AEAphh GCTXZ5pN3KILzYdTWh0CRqfsx0Zx6RQHBD+1LqpciCuNcblPRs8P5M55YPqC0Ls8NJjo Q0AcI8WPTiPbxtsRFgy+o2MYSv9Re9e/lPMNbLEDTV0H6I7zIO4BeCuLQdJBoKn8DrbY mkqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=xy2grrFN9wGKVhsZucRk08kgquICk/WwU9mcyQAQrf8=; b=cr6AyUeHX+eODno0CYLlfI1itKXCkghup6SDs9yb+f8P8SnJa20apE9JeDBB3wX71S K776/RfPc+b3OiQS8eF+SNpo20KrCnnUoQoxGXWHTLkcU86HgHmEgEmk63NwRQVdnBhi vjL9jPlkLmxPsGzVdyDvVj8JfZ0LyjxCUfiR8T0Mfr5+aUBDkX6CbkbXRElHh2GZaZXm /+qOvIdTd1lbhhj9Z3Yh1B+KWz84WGTA8epgjpilrFeUeQ9lxZ1S0Y8RLEIkt//fR+gn erhN0yZCK1qbH5vmRnyKkRwBjveaRp07RKwG5Y/bXp2TpX7CzxZdgO1ys1yw+8sJMJqR sZtA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLbXxPkA4NWN40DA3FSi+4bgD7LTFQdUV45+6amtIG0C9Bc7pc2RJRA45AIgLY47g== X-Received: by 10.46.32.81 with SMTP id g78mr83926ljg.8.1468480680674; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.25.16.27 with SMTP id f27ls31896lfi.30.gmail; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.31.131 with SMTP id f125mr2095209lff.2.1468480680114; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 65si71004wmr.3.2016.07.14.00.18.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::229; Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f93so55573711lfi.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:18:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.25.137 with SMTP id 131mr6570320lfz.149.1468480678914; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.80.65 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.80.65 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] sumti-raising cmavo thingy From: Bruno Panasiewicz To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140222a39eeb50537934d83 X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a1140222a39eeb50537934d83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ni'o la lojbab cu babzba di'e se pi'o ke ju'o lo ri skami: > > On 7/12/2016 6:08 AM, Bruno Panasiewicz wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> The other day, I was thinking, "wouldn't it be useful to have a >> sumti-raising infix cmavo?". >> In other words, wouldn't it be useful to have a cmavo that goes between >> the raised sumti and the rest. >> >> la solpa'i / la selpa'i / la me zi'o already discussed it over on his blog: >> http://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/proprietor-fronting >> >> Having said that, there is this fancy word, {zo'ei} (of LAhE). >> It's roughly equivalent to {zo'e pe}, but more of a single word than two. >> While {tu'a}, {jai} and {kai'a} (from the blog post) relate to a sumti >> and an event, >> {zo'ei} is a relation between a sumti and something related to it. >> >> This brings us to metonyms. >> Metonyms are somewhat related to metaphors; >> they are the usage of an object in a sentence instead of something of >> that object. >> For example, in the sentence "Orders came in from the office", even >> though "office" really stands for "boss" (or something), "office" is >> used because it has some relation to "boss". >> >> If we were to translate this sentence to Lojban with the metonym usage, >> we'd get >> { lo briju cu minde }. >> Because Lojban is a logical language to some extent, it's incorrect to >> say that -- offices don't give orders. >> Just like { mi cizra }, which needs a {jai} (because I'm not an event), >> { lo briju cu minde } should also be fixed with a {jai}-like cmavo, X. >> X, contrary to {jai}, would be in SE (because we don't need to use the >> {jai}-plus-sumtcita feature). >> In order to fix the example, we'd say {zo'ei lo briju cu minde} (which >> is not very natural), or, using X, {lo briju cu X minde}. >> >> Explaining it with a simple relation might help: >> >> tu'a : jai : (kai'a) :: >> zoi'e : X : Y >> >> It's also worth considering the Y, because it could be useful. >> >> ~ mi'e la uakci mu'o > > > Back in the 90s, when tu'e and jai were added to the language, Nick Nicholas frequently talked about metonymy, and he may have discussed this issue. If you look in the Lojban List archives for "metonymy" it might be easy to find, since that word hasn't popped up too often outside Nick's discussions. Ah, that means I'm not the first one thinking about this issue. I couldn't find the archives. Do you know where they are? I'd like to look at those discussions. (Or is the discussion too old to have been archived?) > lojbab ~ mi'e la pe'ukci mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1140222a39eeb50537934d83 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ni'o la lojbab cu babzba di'e se pi'o ke ju'= o lo ri skami:
>
> On 7/12/2016 6:08 AM, Bruno Panasiewicz wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The other day, I was thinking, "wouldn't it be useful to = have a
>> sumti-raising infix cmavo?".
>> In other words, wouldn't it be useful to have a cmavo that goe= s between
>> the raised sumti and the rest.
>>
>> la solpa'i / la selpa'i / la me zi'o already discussed= it over on his blog:
>> h= ttp://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/proprietor-fronting
>>
>> Having said that, there is this fancy word, {zo'ei} (of LAhE).=
>> It's roughly equivalent to {zo'e pe}, but more of a single= word than two.
>> While {tu'a}, {jai} and {kai'a} (from the blog post) relat= e to a sumti
>> and an event,
>> {zo'ei} is a relation between a sumti and something related to= it.
>>
>> This brings us to metonyms.
>> Metonyms are somewhat related to metaphors;
>> they are the usage of an object in a sentence instead of something= of
>> that object.
>> For example, in the sentence "Orders came in from the office&= quot;, even
>> though "office" really stands for "boss" (or s= omething), "office" is
>> used because it has some relation to "boss".
>>
>> If we were to translate this sentence to Lojban with the metonym u= sage,
>> we'd get
>> { lo briju cu minde }.
>> Because Lojban is a logical language to some extent, it's inco= rrect to
>> say that -- offices don't give orders.
>> Just like { mi cizra }, which needs a {jai} (because I'm not a= n event),
>> { lo briju cu minde } should also be fixed with a {jai}-like cmavo= , X.
>> X, contrary to {jai}, would be in SE (because we don't need to= use the
>> {jai}-plus-sumtcita feature).
>> In order to fix the example, we'd say {zo'ei lo briju cu m= inde} (which
>> is not very natural), or, using X, {lo briju cu X minde}.
>>
>> Explaining it with a simple relation might help:
>>
>> =C2=A0tu'a : jai : (kai'a) ::
>> zoi'e :=C2=A0 X=C2=A0 :=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Y
>>
>> It's also worth considering the Y, because it could be useful.=
>>
>> ~ mi'e la uakci mu'o
>
>
> Back in the 90s, when tu'e and jai were added to the language, Nic= k Nicholas frequently talked about metonymy, and he may have discussed this= issue.=C2=A0 If you look in the Lojban List archives for "metonymy&qu= ot; it might be easy to find, since that word hasn't popped up too ofte= n outside Nick's discussions.

Ah, that means I'm not the first one thinking about this= issue. I couldn't find the archives. Do you know where they are? I'= ;d like to look at those discussions. (Or is the discussion too old to have= been archived?)

> lojbab

~ mi'e la pe'ukci mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1140222a39eeb50537934d83--