Received: from mail-wm0-f59.google.com ([74.125.82.59]:34173) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bT3cB-0001MI-I5 for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:58:01 -0700 Received: by mail-wm0-f59.google.com with SMTP id q128sf42123200wma.1 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=gxuyDsz/UUP4WQZpFbc2d4tBNvfyKhPydq2lxVlCbMs=; b=eKg/MX+j4GMSrSlvVqsUUHYE/Ofy4VkDPcKB9XDgaanaN9bWfD3nZlSb2QTWdTt20+ +NSb+BWpx7komuncJePGsBZOaIlJPtlYjysV52Dr933yDg+QMjNH94VPQ1AhmQhdvhZr 0dflyZcVifwZvMLiVmPaoreooWBvB8eMWxX4Q+oH2drx647F8Ust+o4cZo7Pz3cGXJ3a cfz9I79kCga+jMWrFmNO6Xw5B8tJ60ic42KxaQ03TLhar07CYo0D+PXjLO2ibW7p75Fv ugV4jtUIJbxf24Ey9F3rL5PGSciZNwoiaDXY25TXT7Hqezrl8lBOGKtLhnsIODu6BHDL h5gg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=gxuyDsz/UUP4WQZpFbc2d4tBNvfyKhPydq2lxVlCbMs=; b=VsQT0W8C/u6O7dgEuuUsucw8KDCwy/3fSJtRIuQbBF1E7lofgu68ZETrrDe3Mo+Ez/ wlYJ5ASxNAiEwA/AlPD+5IUFRNaQf7SQcmcSZjmJasVhyd37EnKNIbWuEBqDL0RZz2A1 zOu8HLmlox9Oy3foVvlUhXPsgSDODuObOmFRpkWFiWwEQzmBas/JW6lQO2sewkfxBUsG dNLfAa9QGJqPE2jN/EjyX5Y0auaJLgKC1D63FYiAer1sreOUr4Pb8+B+yRFCGVyL7zCm tFVka6KF8TJUlVN/4vSDjD5QucxeDdigUTxKciJxfxTXtw+nWBHNN3ubwgfb5T5lDP0q ZEPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=gxuyDsz/UUP4WQZpFbc2d4tBNvfyKhPydq2lxVlCbMs=; b=aA75qT85/heAr9q3YWeq6JVmC9GABn8BaykbL0QETFiAbULy/KXh5sS+FqXXKhBVoE 9JQeegCrXNyz2hDkNncU1JwMlSnOb8OOycN8lt4bmaeH0lLKS+8bmqh996pKcfln9ZfO IuR/EFmUcw8lh1XblC8gqeTM+A9E0aHwzSm6JX36zhAjdWozfQl8edO0z2rkyb7nlwuK gxoz7lXIqCb3LaRl5zXj1iAsL76v0PM+GSE+/NkRPOszyo3ihwi6+Wyl6gZ/qEM4QG6T chfB8oywczZy6Ptlxs+E7kB6aTt6X8m3Zkv4H05CV0l4tleKZM+WMxNyRawWv6O+ITmX FG7w== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIJh7Y7JhVMmO/VfEVeRXDeAqhiNsKQqWy5TeYMJY95Ju0GnY/1tm2Gv75hHYTUbA== X-Received: by 10.28.165.149 with SMTP id o143mr469798wme.2.1469782668866; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.193.78 with SMTP id r75ls244654wmf.10.gmail; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.249.101 with SMTP id yt5mr5400785wjc.6.1469782668415; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i193si124688wmg.1.2016.07.29.01.57.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c; Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id b199so66773656lfe.0 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.133.212 with SMTP id h203mr15450115lfd.28.1469782667957; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:57:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Bruno Panasiewicz Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:57:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] explicit tanru To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11466de0d22d990538c271b3 X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11466de0d22d990538c271b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 coi jbozabna In Lojban, all tanru are made by putting two (or more; technically one brivla also makes for a tanru, but anyway) brivla next to each other. I'm considering something of a dialect/preference/whatever that would require a tanru to be enclosed in {ke} to make it a tanru; otherwise, it would break into two selbri. For example, {lo blanu stizu} would parse as { [CU stizu VAU]}, and to express the intended 'blue chair', it'd be required to say {lo ke blanu stizu}. What do you think about such a convention? ~ mi'e la uakci mu'o re'i .e'e sai .i lo fanmo selsku be mi cu binxo co ke du'e va'e clani cai ~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11466de0d22d990538c271b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
coi jbozabna

In Lojban, all tanru are made by putti= ng two (or more; technically one brivla also
makes for a tanru, but an= yway) brivla next to each other.

I'm considering something of = a dialect/preference/whatever that would require a tanru
to be enclose= d in {ke} to make it a tanru; otherwise, it would break into two selbri.
For example, {lo blanu stizu} would parse as {<lo blanu KU> [CU st= izu VAU]}, and to
express the intended 'blue chair', it'd = be required to say {lo ke blanu stizu}.
What do you think about such a= convention?

~ mi'e la uakci mu'o re'i .e'e sai
=C2=A0 .i lo fanmo selsku be mi cu binxo co ke du'e va'e clani c= ai ~

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11466de0d22d990538c271b3--