Received: from mail-wm0-f64.google.com ([74.125.82.64]:33135) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bYJVc-0003Jt-Ak for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:54 -0700 Received: by mail-wm0-f64.google.com with SMTP id i5sf26051449wmg.0 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=m1QxWy1rjJZ8ffeV1IBdcmC3cMWqgnPuhKnBvugAbSc=; b=oS5/oqN0mPw7lmNp6DzSwxb+n6ZuE8ZbwcAEzkIzjwTqy47heMiIj43kVuOWx7QqJn wAYqQRr1hAeaKg4aroyI36NHJAcDsmXA3HgaKDBTr712eNNEpGCNjQ5DI8wa05XY0lUC R+MoBAHJw5/0gyVahyi1hqhYYp9sbgumNn/ibGlz+6P8ElvSLc7Iu6dPB7ODLMJ7N7Jr 9priawSS3icOs8Bx6YbzTuCHFLMSpITfzfYUAOkR4ZIpONsuqdPY3YHy5PSI9+corPiT LTvEpedE6cAETzFx3GjvHg2kxpFNwkgCM8AYjbg2gr+z0NC0Bb1/83AcjkVAcdJnE7MF Ga5g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=m1QxWy1rjJZ8ffeV1IBdcmC3cMWqgnPuhKnBvugAbSc=; b=sZHfI1+Ey/jKfcMrAVxPiAXpx9kLw04LNOu8EemNPbIlDagR/+EyBc7TjfUzzl6ttp ILAe836uwYB5BVudV1OVJ9yyY7dWpSCQAcayZqoJOX4ZUTB1/aBA8YuxLaTSFdNslePf I7UbexZllKqVozRMd860n80wx8bQeo09or1hlGI+A+eeM7ly+5m+NCLguZbMyUPIwBOn JbNZMwspQBpdDZiF5NB80f+/q8BU3dSh6DnJfoJ9WEXZgJT/VhE3q16MbmXqI4mXRma4 VDtOLAXdddGrnrlS6gfhQoOF60zYuRJ71AHJOgTxZszw+jm5Vss33vErm4zmE6XUsJjF pWpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=m1QxWy1rjJZ8ffeV1IBdcmC3cMWqgnPuhKnBvugAbSc=; b=M3d1apfqQFexH4Dgao60aVGWDh6lkG/+oIZ+AHKZ9EKOBwcWdlHZFG9S0CHHc7Emf4 4om3uDtZFENSAIb3WO9bQ57t4Ir9grVfPjZjr6bSLts3lNFtwpOc0/2cT2yzxCXVGBKt m5WZKLtvGamTgSK5uHhXIkxG/gBi/HvJRN9ju/g2rHlFYgMwm16exBuXS+vsNFaTt8t9 dcDTex2WMlaNCb5lZjyNWfJuYfnBQZ3aUW6Bzhafdowq8w4DbmPeVYp6CKY3MrjlloAh 8/EKVVJ5cz5l3tWTim7sneciHCuyDoTGGMbyKVl+lcjWt2Ta7qBb5biLWYjhDr2EAXyY cXUw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout6z9rUFxJ2089F2bJ6+6W7J5PE6r5nH0ROQK2ef9IXDcKXBNPdcqq1MqeReFcscw== X-Received: by 10.46.9.77 with SMTP id 74mr129235ljj.0.1471035405708; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.46.9.83 with SMTP id 80ls155225ljj.2.gmail; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.234.207 with SMTP id y76mr2119795lfi.9.1471035405333; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w64si207238wmf.3.2016.08.12.13.56.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c09::236; Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f65so47354596wmi.0 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.206.146 with SMTP id e140mr2732577lfg.138.1471035404447; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:56:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <131093c4-e717-4fd4-6e8b-ae12ce85a5b0@lojban.org> From: Bruno Panasiewicz Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 22:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] taking action To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114002f8bbf7920539e61ef3 X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a114002f8bbf7920539e61ef3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 12, 2016 10:26 PM, "Bob LeChevalier" wrote: > > On 8/12/2016 4:02 PM, Bruno Panasiewicz wrote: >>> >>> Probably because nobody has even heard of it. This needs to change. >> >> >> Agreed; though it's hard not to look into a two-month thread. > > > There are a lot of people who don't try to keep up with Lojban List anymore, including me. (Much of the discussion is in Lojban, and I haven't the time or fluency to even try. And of the stuff that is in English, it is pretty difficult to keep track of what are ideas and what stuff is actually being worked on. Agree. Newer services (like Reddit) seem to be getting attention, while the mailing list drops in popularity. Some even don't want to use mail, for some reason. > > >>> LLG, the Lojban community organization, is attempting to get itself >> >> reactivated. Alas, for several years it was dependent on one person, >> Robin Powell, who ran the website but also ran byfy and was doing the >> revision for CLL (the red book). >> >> Why is he no longer in? > > > He has chosen to "drop out" at least for a while, so that he can work on other interests. (Beyond that, you will have to ask him directly.) OK, that's all I want to know, thanks. > >>> There also has been discussion of a small quasi-competitive prize fund >> >> that would be a reward for the most significant contributions to the >> community. There would be periodic fixed-amount prizes in several >> categories, funded from the LLG budget (as well as any donations >> specifically for that purpose). The details have to be discussed, and >> I will urge the two outreachers to lead discussion on that topic. >> >> Hmm, the success of such funding depends on how it's organized. As I >> mentioned earlier, it can make volunteers decline in number, in the >> worst scenario. > > > We've been thinking in terms of annual awards, chosen kinda like Nobel Prizes. So far as I know, such prizes are tangential to people actually deciding to get involved in such activities. That is a good idea. > > LLG can also use its budget to pay for actual expenses of projects, but that would not be payment for services (we don't have anywhere near the money to pay even one person at a salary level). Even in such a low-budget case, funding projects with money, be it big or small, is a good idea. > > >> Yeah, it's a big problem. The concepts I mailed about and proposed over >> a span of only a few months can't be counted on one's hands. On the >> other hand, the number of those that were implemented can, even on one hand. > > > And to be honest, I don't know a single one of those, and in fact cannot recall reading any postings of yours before today. That's a bummer. Does that mean I shall make my topics more memorable? (Not the topics themselves, but the ideas.) > > But let's see if that can change. Not so much me keeping up (because I can't anymore), but LLG in the form of my two outreach people. Please encourage them when they post. We're rather new at this type of thing, and need to find out what will work. I'm doing that everytime. I feel like the interest is increasing, for about a month. Hope that the changes in LLG will increase the increase. > > lojbab =E2=80=94 mi'e la uakci mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a114002f8bbf7920539e61ef3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 12, 2016 10:26 PM, "Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/12/2016 4:02 PM, Bruno Panasiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably because nobody has even heard of it.=C2=A0 This needs= to change.
>>
>>
>> Agreed; though it's hard not to look into a two-month thread.<= br> >
>
> There are a lot of people who don't try to keep up with Lojban Lis= t anymore, including me.=C2=A0 (Much of the discussion is in Lojban, and I = haven't the time or fluency to even try.=C2=A0 And of the stuff that is= in English, it is pretty difficult to keep track of what are ideas and wha= t stuff is actually being worked on.

Agree. Newer services (like Reddit) seem to be getting atten= tion, while the mailing list drops in popularity. Some even don't want = to use mail, for some reason.

>
>
>>> LLG, the Lojban community organization, is attempting to get i= tself
>>
>> reactivated.=C2=A0 Alas, for several years it was dependent on one= person,
>> Robin Powell, who ran the website but also ran byfy and was doing = the
>> revision for CLL (the red book).
>>
>> Why is he no longer in?
>
>
> He has chosen to "drop out" at least for a while, so that he= can work on other interests.=C2=A0 (Beyond that, you will have to ask him = directly.)

OK, that's all I want to know, thanks.

>
>>> There also has been discussion of a small quasi-competitive pr= ize fund
>>
>> that would be a reward for the most significant contributions to t= he
>> community.=C2=A0 =C2=A0There would be periodic fixed-amount prizes= in several
>> categories, funded from the LLG budget (as well as any donations >> specifically for that purpose).=C2=A0 =C2=A0The details have to be= discussed, and
>> I will urge the two outreachers to lead discussion on that topic.<= br> >>
>> Hmm, the success of such funding depends on how it's organized= . As I
>> mentioned earlier, it can make volunteers decline in number, in th= e
>> worst scenario.
>
>
> We've been thinking in terms of annual awards, chosen kinda like N= obel Prizes.=C2=A0 So far as I know, such prizes are tangential to people a= ctually deciding to get involved in such activities.

That is a good idea.

>
> LLG can also use its budget to pay for actual expenses of projects, bu= t that would not be payment for services (we don't have anywhere near t= he money to pay even one person at a salary level).

Even in such a low-budget case, funding projects with money,= be it big or small, is a good idea.

>
>
>> Yeah, it's a big problem. The concepts I mailed about and prop= osed over
>> a span of only a few months can't be counted on one's hand= s. On the
>> other hand, the number of those that were implemented can, even on= one hand.
>
>
> And to be honest, I don't know a single one of those, and in fact = cannot recall reading any postings of yours before today.

That's a bummer. Does that mean I shall make my topics m= ore memorable? (Not the topics themselves, but the ideas.)

>
> But let's see if that can change.=C2=A0 Not so much me keeping up = (because I can't anymore), but LLG in the form of my two outreach peopl= e.=C2=A0 Please encourage them when they post.=C2=A0 We're rather new a= t this type of thing, and need to find out what will work.

I'm doing that everytime. I feel like the interest is in= creasing, for about a month. Hope that the changes in LLG will increase the= increase.

>
> lojbab

=E2=80=94 mi'e la uakci mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a114002f8bbf7920539e61ef3--