Received: from mail-ua0-f191.google.com ([209.85.217.191]:34044) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bZjHO-0002r9-FN for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:40:06 -0700 Received: by mail-ua0-f191.google.com with SMTP id u13sf27475343uau.1 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:40:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:comment:comment:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :date:subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=wS/JF9eUKFtUoj9GWR+CNnu6D+jggrEy2XJ6LCAx3Ls=; b=ZEi6XT/cSTivjUAYFJ3vYy+ZSwG5x7DxXSEAoez0jDon4mo0pjofrb6o+AJmaW89OI D5W4cgteu5XSAc0XrPDLavUZyRxtNZmet3RgitT35nz2VcS77bwCuhbfMsrFfWi6EzjL uBSYQTrESMYpEw3o6X7PmAhxFgl9rTxLlVcQPWovrBzk9f/dUnXOPPXne2fOyAXxJkg4 PfOSH4gdRkuxFs4GoTuiBfEpvS2qKqIuEhYfZS+ypBLllCyif6E0ldNMm1ecaLuvGls1 47dv0gmH73xph35RFEs37gF3UEpind2F6NPGnGQ1kjMNzXPZ0Ruo9RsItXPU8xYTyGZc oZ7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:comment:comment:from :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=wS/JF9eUKFtUoj9GWR+CNnu6D+jggrEy2XJ6LCAx3Ls=; b=TlAWBfBDadMBz5WxBeKXr6GhK4RLuMROUuk2MB/66i4d7CUnudQWhocC4l22ViC/ma nQyp/zDbX3nB7L1sOEqgIddqh3Rd6q5HMVCXvzuVBAEQjyUtp1YxClwaUU3WtDyYWZJr u6qGkMSyH+A0JIzRpFkensN0F9E7S1iLt6QSr78rMgXWDYCMLtoXs+88DHEQZlpKmyx+ 2B6FvR46fbkRWGnyIbbJvKW/LTjlfy4fehsVjaL12E53pQ3MUtrAifAO+rvNFe+UHH/2 z+xidqqBuDFIImYErVvI/0wQjZR5802qyvlyOw39ZCFKi/DZHdNtWXV674IfHorycuAg SI8A== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousMUi9eq8WVDYV7GMAImRJmor8fCFN6HPrt4F7sj1Snq04PS9tS0nENSIKUEEjMYg== X-Received: by 10.157.37.209 with SMTP id q75mr931643ota.15.1471372796290; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.39.36 with SMTP id r33ls10234704ota.28.gmail; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.200.41.168 with SMTP id 37mr26154330qts.26.1471372795592; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail906.opentransfer.com (mail906.opentransfer.com. [98.130.1.181]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e189si1449463ith.3.2016.08.16.11.39.55 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 98.130.1.181 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of webmaster@kyleroucis.com) client-ip=98.130.1.181; Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys Received: (qmail 5854 invoked by uid 399); 16 Aug 2016 18:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.32.35.123?) (webmaster@kyleroucis.com@8.26.157.224) by mail906.opentransfer.com with ESMTPAM; 16 Aug 2016 18:39:54 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 8.26.157.224 From: Kyle Roucis Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-AAA3D746-566D-4AE4-A96C-0D2552759C7B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:39:53 -0700 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Please, support proposal for a Lojban StackExchange site Message-Id: <64485AEB-4145-4B71-A13E-E96D42314CFD@kyleroucis.com> References: <527a0e9c-0982-4d46-80c7-ebdf700789d1@googlegroups.com> <1b4ee236-1421-4d0a-ab03-73d0bb5ae509@googlegroups.com> <796fb307-a6b4-43f0-82df-f7353ca7703a@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14A5322e) X-Original-Sender: webmaster@kyleroucis.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=temperror (no key for signature) header.i=@kyleroucis.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 98.130.1.181 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of webmaster@kyleroucis.com) smtp.mailfrom=webmaster@kyleroucis.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --Apple-Mail-AAA3D746-566D-4AE4-A96C-0D2552759C7B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> 90% are male (do we really want lojban to be more male-loaded than it al= ready is?), and 26% are in the united states (source: quantcast.com). Is th= at all we want to reach? (yes, 73% of those are also in the sweet spot of = 18-44yo) Wow, seriously? Making a Stack Exchange site for lojban is not mutually exc= lusive to other channels. Our community should not care *what* a nintadni i= s, just that they are interested in Lojban. Anyone is free to suggest more = channels for spreading the word about Lojban, and providing more visibility= and utility to the community. I think it's sad that the lojban community harbors such shame for our demog= raphic reach. Lojban has no rules about who can and cannot participate, and= that is exactly as it should be. All are welcome, as long as they understa= nd that it takes work, interest, and engagement to learn the language. I think the StackExchange proposal is a great idea! It will provide a searc= hable and structured way to answer oft-times complex or controversial quest= ions about lojban. Kyle Roucis www.kyleroucis.com > On Aug 16, 2016, at 05:46, Michael Turniansky wro= te: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: >> No, that I missed it suggests that they themselves still consider their = target audience to be programmers. Look, I'm not against question sites. = I'm a contributor to quora.com, for example. But take a look at stackexcha= nge's demographics. They reach about 27 million unique visitors per month = (And, I notice, 24 million of that are specifically to stackoverflow). 90%= are male (do we really want lojban to be more male-loaded than it already = is?), and 26% are in the united states (source: quantcast.com). Is that all= we want to reach? (yes, 73% of those are also in the sweet spot of 18-44y= o) Email, OTOH, is read every day by about 1.2 billion people (out of the 4= .3 billion who have it), and ISTM that if it's on a subject matter you are = interested, you actually will read it. (case in point-- you are reading thi= s, aren't you?) >>=20 >> And I agree that for asking a question, perhaps a mailing list isn't the= best. When I have a specific question, though, I don't limit myself to on= e site (and now that I have seen it, I have indeed read specific Q/A on sta= ckexchange from time to time). I use a search engine to see who has an/the= best answer.. >>=20 >> Like I said, I have no objection to you guys adding it to stackexchange,= I just question why you would think that's better than email. >>=20 >> --gejyspa >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Alex Kozhevnikov = wrote: >>> Been lurking here for about two years since my last post, but this >>> just had to be replied to. >>>=20 >>> StackExchange is _the_ Q&A site - anyone who's interested in the >>> growth of Lojban should seriously explore/grok StackExchange, >>> preferably on a sub-site for a subject which interests them, before >>> dismissing this, because it would definitely help that cause. >>>=20 >>> Look, I'm 25, and I've been comfortable with email and email lists >>> like this for a long time. But for the majority of my age-peers, email >>> itself is this tertiary, neglected communication medium that they're >>> not exactly eager to use for regular communication. And email >>> distribution lists like this one? Of everyone I personally know, _no >>> one_ would chose a mailing list over StackExchange as a medium for >>> asking question in the pursuit of learning a new language. Here's an >>> example: I just tried asking my partner which she would prefer: she >>> doesn't really like or frequent StackExchange - but it took a good 20 >>> minutes before she even understood what this kind of mailing list is, >>> let alone why anyone would want such a thing. I'm willing to blame >>> about half of that on me starting out with the assumption that she >>> knew/remembered what it was and thus not zeroing in on how to explain >>> it quickly enough, but it's illustrative. Mailing lists list this are >>> _alien_ to the population cohort that's taking over now. StackExchange >>> isn't a common household name like facebook yet, but it's not foreign >>> either. >>>=20 >>> karis: In terms of awareness/visibility, the current options are to >>> StackExchange like a candle is to a star. In terms of leaving a useful >>> record for the future, there's no real comparison. There are other >>> issues: because I often don't have time to read every lojban mailing >>> list email, I end up tuning them all out: that effect doesn't happen >>> with a StackExchange, because it's not a stream into your inbox, it's >>> a directory of questions with relevant answers, indexed by topic and >>> sorted by quality (as collectively determined by the masses). The real >>> question is how will the newcomers to the StackExchange discover this >>> mailing list, which I think _does_ offer value that a StackExchange >>> doesn't. >>>=20 >>> When I first joined this mailing list a few years ago, I asked if >>> dotside was widely accepted/used. I asked a question about signing >>> names and the exact arguments in favor of the slightly different ways >>> that I saw people signing their names. If I ever knew how to >>> find/search publicly available archives for this mailing list for >>> those questions, I don't remember how to do so now. Nor ever seen it >>> show up in a search engine query about it: but I do know that if there >>> was a lojban.stackexchange.com, it would be trivial to search for, it >>> would almost certainly start to show up on the first page of search >>> results for relevant keywords, and it would even be automatically >>> suggested to someone who starts typing up a similar question on the >>> site. A new StackExchange site will have vastly more exposure than >>> this mailing list, simply by sheer volume of traffic already going >>> there, the fact that it already has communities interested in both >>> natlangs and conlangs to whom mailing lists are about as >>> accessible/comfortable as floppy disks and cassette tapes, the fact >>> that popular questions get recommended/linked across all StackExchange >>> sites, and search-engine exposure (the vast majority of the time if >>> I'm looking for information about something that there's a >>> StackExchange site for, the StackExchange results show up first - the >>> only exceptions I can think of are obscure open-source technical >>> discussions, where very well established mailing lists with well-known >>> highly-ranked-in-search-engines web-accessible archives occasionally >>> still win out, sometimes. >>>=20 >>> gejyspa: It was after two (moderately long) sentences. That you missed >>> it suggests to me a serious bias against allocating another second or >>> two to genuinely properly evaluate the new thing being presented to >>> you, and/or towards dismissing it out-of-hand. And honestly, that you >>> think your 30+ years is an argument for its obscurity is >>> eyebrow-raising to me. Accumulating experience naturally means you'd >>> have less reason to seek out something like StackExchange than a new >>> software developer. And if you've had decades to develop a skillset >>> for acquiring knowledge in the absence of a resource like >>> StackOverflow/StackExchange, that would clearly reduce the likelihood >>> of finding it after it did appear: if you answer your questions by >>> reading the documentation/manpages, testing it out, reading through >>> the source-code and/or disassembly, stepping through with a debugger, >>> or asking another coworker, etc, and are comfortable enough navigating >>> that set of options, there's no reason why you'd ever find it. >>> Meanwhile the modern youth type their questions in a search engine in >>> obtusely natural-language sentences, and hope for the best. Which, >>> with the growth of things like StackExchange, has gradually become an >>> actually viable strategy. >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> mu'o mi'e la .a,lekSANdr.koJEVni,kov. do'u >>>=20 >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps "lojban" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send = an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>=20 >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --Apple-Mail-AAA3D746-566D-4AE4-A96C-0D2552759C7B Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
90% are m= ale (do we really want lojban to be more male-loaded than it already is?), = and 26% are in the united states (source: quantcast.com). Is that all we want to reach? &n= bsp;(yes, 73% of those are also in the sweet spot of 18-44yo)=

Wow, seriously? Making a Stack Exchange site for lojban is = not mutually exclusive to other channels. Our community should not care *wh= at* a nintadni is, just that they are interested in Lojban. Anyone is free = to suggest more channels for spreading the word about Lojban, and providing= more visibility and utility to the community.

I think it's sad that the = lojban community harbors such shame for our demographic reach. Lojban has n= o rules about who can and cannot participate, and that is exactly as it sho= uld be. All are welcome, as long as they understand that it takes work, int= erest, and engagement to learn the language.

I think the StackExchange pr= oposal is a great idea! It will provide a searchable and structured way to = answer oft-times complex or controversial questions about lojban.

Ky= le Roucis

On Aug 16, 2016, at 05:46, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:


On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:4= 4 AM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
No, that I missed it sug= gests that they themselves still consider their target audience to be progr= ammers.  Look, I'm not against question sites.  I'm a contributor= to quora.com, for examp= le.  But take a look at stackexchange's demographics.  They reach= about 27 million unique visitors per month (And, I= notice, 24 million of that are specifically to stackoverflow). &nbs= p;90% are male (do we really want lojban to be more male-loaded than it alr= eady is?), and 26% are in the united states (source: quantcast.com). Is that all we want to rea= ch?  (yes, 73% of those are also in the sweet spot of 18-44yo) Email, = OTOH, is read every day by about 1.2 billion people (out of the 4.3 billion= who have it), and ISTM that if it's on a subject matter you are interested= , you actually will read it. (case in point-- you are reading this, aren't = you?)

And I agree that for asking a question, perhaps a = mailing list isn't the best.  When I have a specific question, though,= I don't limit myself to one site (and now that I have seen it, I have inde= ed read specific Q/A on stackexchange from time to time).  I use a sea= rch engine to see who has an/the best answer..

Lik= e I said, I have no objection to you guys adding it to stackexchange, I jus= t question why you would think that's better than email.

=
                  &= nbsp;  --gejyspa


On T= ue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Alex Kozhevnikov <alexkoz@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
Been lurking here for about= two years since my last post, but this
just had to be replied to.

StackExchange is _the_ Q&A site - anyone who's interested in the
growth of Lojban should seriously explore/grok StackExchange,
preferably on a sub-site for a subject which interests them, before
dismissing this, because it would definitely help that cause.

Look, I'm 25, and I've been comfortable with email and email lists
like this for a long time. But for the majority of my age-peers, email
itself is this tertiary, neglected communication medium that they're
not exactly eager to use for regular communication. And email
distribution lists like this one? Of everyone I personally know, _no
one_ would chose a mailing list over StackExchange as a medium for
asking question in the pursuit of learning a new language. Here's an
example: I just tried asking my partner which she would prefer: she
doesn't really like or frequent StackExchange - but it took a good 20
minutes before she even understood what this kind of mailing list is,
let alone why anyone would want such a thing. I'm willing to blame
about half of that on me starting out with the assumption that she
knew/remembered what it was and thus not zeroing in on how to explain
it quickly enough, but it's illustrative. Mailing lists list this are
_alien_ to the population cohort that's taking over now. StackExchange
isn't a common household name like facebook yet, but it's not foreign
either.

karis: In terms of awareness/visibility, the current options are to
StackExchange like a candle is to a star. In terms of leaving a useful
record for the future, there's no real comparison. There are other
issues: because I often don't have time to read every lojban mailing
list email, I end up tuning them all out: that effect doesn't happen
with a StackExchange, because it's not a stream into your inbox, it's
a directory of questions with relevant answers, indexed by topic and
sorted by quality (as collectively determined by the masses). The real
question is how will the newcomers to the StackExchange discover this
mailing list, which I think _does_ offer value that a StackExchange
doesn't.

When I first joined this mailing list a few years ago, I asked if
dotside was widely accepted/used. I asked a question about signing
names and the exact arguments in favor of the slightly different ways
that I saw people signing their names. If I ever knew how to
find/search publicly available archives for this mailing list for
those questions, I don't remember how to do so now. Nor ever seen it
show up in a search engine query about it: but I do know that if there
was a lojban.stackexchange.com, it would be trivial to search for= , it
would almost certainly start to show up on the first page of search
results for relevant keywords, and it would even be automatically
suggested to someone who starts typing up a similar question on the
site. A new StackExchange site will have vastly more exposure than
this mailing list, simply by sheer volume of traffic already going
there, the fact that it already has communities interested in both
natlangs and conlangs to whom mailing lists are about as
accessible/comfortable as floppy disks and cassette tapes, the fact
that popular questions get recommended/linked across all StackExchange
sites, and search-engine exposure (the vast majority of the time if
I'm looking for information about something that there's a
StackExchange site for, the StackExchange results show up first - the
only exceptions I can think of are obscure open-source technical
discussions, where very well established mailing lists with well-known
highly-ranked-in-search-engines web-accessible archives occasionally still win out, sometimes.

gejyspa: It was after two (moderately long) sentences. That you missed
it suggests to me a serious bias against allocating another second or
two to genuinely properly evaluate the new thing being presented to
you, and/or towards dismissing it out-of-hand. And honestly, that you
think your 30+ years is an argument for its obscurity is
eyebrow-raising to me. Accumulating experience naturally means you'd
have less reason to seek out something like StackExchange than a new
software developer. And if you've had decades to develop a skillset
for acquiring knowledge in the absence of a resource like
StackOverflow/StackExchange, that would clearly reduce the likelihood
of finding it after it did appear: if you answer your questions by
reading the documentation/manpages, testing it out, reading through
the source-code and/or disassembly, stepping through with a debugger,
or asking another coworker, etc, and are comfortable enough navigating
that set of options, there's no reason why you'd ever find it.
Meanwhile the modern youth type their questions in a search engine in
obtusely natural-language sentences, and hope for the best. Which,
with the growth of things like StackExchange, has gradually become an
actually viable strategy.

Regards,
mu'o mi'e la .a,lekSANdr.koJEVni,kov. do'u

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--Apple-Mail-AAA3D746-566D-4AE4-A96C-0D2552759C7B--