Received: from mail-wm0-f63.google.com ([74.125.82.63]:34273) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bcoog-0003GC-GL for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:18 -0700 Received: by mail-wm0-f63.google.com with SMTP id w207sf17706332wmw.1 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=AZrQEuxL9Um0BIp7dvxCcMgs8hJizoxmzPAFEFFLp60=; b=xR6ZBUmmoYRFQ3mrsEFxE1o16dDzZkCwotE12sHbxPBGYRpp4SpuS9P/ZSwTbwsuyh 0xdM3nSC932Unhs4WL4dSy1DsnRin+CObj/1Hy/TAKLVidX7gyP039OMPh4YrdlAewVR fl4kdl+aVKi21jGuD0R7EcUvEruX1vVPAZWaQhJYKcOl9JXjG84YJQJDgke2mdL2HdXc m281Y/zey7Yf25hsGXPG+XgK2OAvi1lEzHNGt1q/kOt61Q/3PEBSEtqtrIeVvtvzbjYN xhgiINrMg1ik4vr8Ken/tlL6+pN1WhcxF8PKRJGXAcza0qqvthBrYNW/pHIcjaUgSSXi Vv4A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=AZrQEuxL9Um0BIp7dvxCcMgs8hJizoxmzPAFEFFLp60=; b=UORTq88xIGozIxZwcbymuiAjZ8NPe508IlijCZgxDDoO35YHW5aWdLcVyXLEsNMdaX TKdtjVHKzmjZKnzqY26mpoJPlKoBrRNjHG+DK1y1UZfW0uLBBvq0gj71EhUDlRVLkB6W RohcIER1Y0MV2KyWYDNSx8tUr4I6gshSAI7AjIADMtXh+ACxOJPSrXrhqCs4MH+Dyn7k 9f0OZ/6D2BdWJPUsWWJfL4/kzzBa0HC8N3PnbCcvNGNDAGQDj0lwhIkBEWdVWrxn4Tpx x/wpoe6uj/ijsLH+1WOMn15vWB/ALFWvE9G8cI6Zdu4JweImHUApdq7N0hPzTkb4+BR5 xzGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=AZrQEuxL9Um0BIp7dvxCcMgs8hJizoxmzPAFEFFLp60=; b=aig53vdBA3PauwpWlCvr6jMWHYE0dyy3382x/SAjQYoUzafxw97qWx+I1t0H6qTHeU xUJacta0BF/R4hq4OXZDIFyUjewr0mXjy4fDeLuYoiwrQFO5ijqhNUK9iRyGHeMd1D2y /YCKAiNwQuuC6WLw+lIOGW8ofu8IYLEd6bwxlfTI8neBRC0AchVRfYBOMaSFB09vtMlr aOC8uM15EpjwT060kjbxO8WO21tEm0K/q8q2bOGea/qHwRHZERQphQEeDk838v01c6NZ NclS83tVXYFev/3BZRRH38T8z78ou4myrhyM/TBCp86sxB8DObm9l3gS+43OZ4gxRCmb 540g== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwP0eniW5dpINpDpTUzxhVyhDFmj8vrY9mghvKsfLGbJxq2ijsiGvxJ7szPZYuhIiA== X-Received: by 10.28.193.201 with SMTP id r192mr66120wmf.12.1472109063772; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.63.23 with SMTP id m23ls144817wma.3.gmail; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.2.227 with SMTP id 3mr1011569wjx.3.1472109063310; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7si1761570wmd.0.2016.08.25.00.11.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c; Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id g62so27962535lfe.3 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.206.146 with SMTP id e140mr1661735lfg.138.1472109062702; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5354cff3-8b06-45c1-a48f-93ada152e9b8@googlegroups.com> From: uakci Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:11:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] -bom-/-nom- & KE To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114002f8c0caa1053ae019e3 X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a114002f8c0caa1053ae019e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 25, 2016 1:19 AM, "Curtis Franks" wrote: > > > > > it should be a rafsi of a cmavo of KE! > > > > > > But NU and KEI behave the same way as rafsi. Now, they could work as KE/KEhE, but it does not seem necessary to me. > > > > > > > Here's the question: would it be useful to have a KE that works like -bom-/-nom- - turns the enclosed selbrisle into a selbrisle, the meaning of which is the thing named by those selbrisle? > > > > > > I would imagine so. It would not hurt, anyway. It also seems natural, especially if these rafsi were to exist. It kind of weirds me out to have rafsi which exist in no other form (meaning that no truly complete veljvo may be formed). I would just ask that the cmavo selrafsi be fo la .lojban. are similar to these rafsi (meaning that they begin with a "b" or "n" respectively, and that they contain an "o" in them; I would also like them to look somewhat mutually similar). > > > But, syntactically, -bom- and -nom- work as KE and KEhE respectively, and it wouldn't make sense making *another* KEhE. > > How are you figuring that out? From lujvo alone? If so, it is still not clear to me that what you say is actually the case. Abstractions can kind of work the same way when being compressed from veljvo into the rafsi in a lujvo. Could you just elaborate on your reasoning? You might be right; I just do not know. Well, first of all, -bom- and -nom- work as opening and closing brackets, the only difference being that they do something to the enclosed stuff. This is one clue it could be KE. Then, they can be skipped at the beginning or end. Try to do that with NU: kurtynomvla =E2=9C=94 kurtykepyvla =E2=9C=94 (it's described in CLL) kurtykezvla =E2=9D=8C That's my reasoning. > > But, really, selma'o assignment is a secondary concern. These words seem to deserve selrafsi. I agree. > > ___ > > > > > whatever the kurtV gismu is > > > > > > What /is/ it? I have always said "kurti" in my head, but I am dying to know what others use. ;) > > Well, I guess that's the most probable one... or is it? Maybe it's an -o-ending culture gismu: > > > > kurto: x1 reflects Kurtis' language/culture in aspect x2. > > I could get on board with that. You shall. ~ uakci --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a114002f8c0caa1053ae019e3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 25, 2016 1:19 AM, "Curtis Franks" <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com> w= rote:
>
> > > > it should be a rafsi of a cmavo of KE!
> > >
> > > But NU and KEI behave the same way as rafsi. Now, they could= work as KE/KEhE, but it does not seem necessary to me.
> > >
> > > > Here's the question: would it be useful to have a K= E that works like -bom-/-nom- - turns the enclosed selbrisle into a selbris= le, the meaning of which is the thing named by those selbrisle?
> > >
> > > I would imagine so. It would not hurt, anyway.=C2=A0 It also= seems natural, especially if these rafsi were to exist. It kind of weirds = me out to have rafsi which exist in no other form (meaning that no truly co= mplete veljvo may be formed). I would just ask that the cmavo selrafsi be f= o la .lojban. are similar to these rafsi (meaning that they begin with a &q= uot;b" or "n" respectively, and that they contain an "o= " in them; I would also like them to look somewhat mutually similar).<= br> >
> > But, syntactically, -bom- and -nom- work as KE and KEhE respectiv= ely, and it wouldn't make sense making *another* KEhE.
>
> How are you figuring that out?=C2=A0 From lujvo alone?=C2=A0 If so, it= is still not clear to me that what you say is actually the case. Abstracti= ons can kind of work the same way when being compressed from veljvo into th= e rafsi in a lujvo. Could you just elaborate on your reasoning? You might b= e right; I just do not know.

Well, first of all, -bom- and -nom- work as opening and clos= ing brackets, the only difference being that they do something to the enclo= sed stuff. This is one clue it could be KE. Then, they can be skipped at th= e beginning or end. Try to do that with NU:

kurtynomvla =E2=9C=94
kurtykepyvla =E2=9C=94 (it's described in CLL)
kurtykezvla =E2=9D=8C

That's my reasoning.

>
> But, really, selma'o assignment is a secondary concern. These word= s seem to deserve selrafsi.

I agree.

>
> ___
>
> > > > whatever the kurtV gismu is
> > >
> > > What /is/ it? I have always said "kurti" in my hea= d, but I am dying to know what others use. ;)
> > Well, I guess that's the most probable one... or is it? Maybe= it's an -o-ending culture gismu:
> >
> > kurto: x1 reflects Kurtis' language/culture in aspect x2.
>
> I could get on board with that.

You shall.

~ uakci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a114002f8c0caa1053ae019e3--