Received: from mail-lf0-f58.google.com ([209.85.215.58]:33533) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bfYAK-0000C9-0W for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:53 -0700 Received: by mail-lf0-f58.google.com with SMTP id g62sf30605578lfe.0 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JR7cLHO09EGOsKZZI7U12mjbKqN8Y6fQj+0sYMqZxYo=; b=kWHjH0lxPQls7uYdC+qYtOg3Zye2b5rNNTqJVU8p5MUkhlPQHTNxnC5SHQrJjg7hfR jfn1fK0/5L5Sm3h/DEWaV2KAeYfbNjiOmtz4KwpB3FFnzJh1P6ceJ8XOOWV/HUoZgtr+ IeW28NPH0BD9XEzxFb1hlKyFO4oUkBR3end0rxmpJ/Xn00ZYh0lEPs96bv9sTS8Zd4zk Y3dr1qC+bSovCLfPQV3waR1nn0Y6tSVPKZbt1UMIqxM3G/QWnDK7kY4foUSMsFpEVzzI Pi61VEOOSLOSVUgle2AkbE4p3EZzUiVO+/dUJJkXFZAz4eRFqV+PiIGmN+Ul4IyjArXu scTA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JR7cLHO09EGOsKZZI7U12mjbKqN8Y6fQj+0sYMqZxYo=; b=uEiItYJJIzv03QxMU8L7hjprmRlenTWwLOp+jIRaIHIJ+2oN8kbgjdX2HwoTQqipAe bWx7oAbDW1l1pROmoXMvCTX+l4cUXvmfKONPxXMrHR/9e/058NQCDl0+8YYgx49jybPY hdBIo8xThteOeDjOywP7sGeNhWkhonSeE3mIadsy6pJZAbJ78JNnh5eqNUkiPu6yEx5K 49epPPdxLSffsaAefHm8IJfqu5LL7sqs6WT/AGApG4rpWRAUyHDWbskdoZukBuJ6GDrz Ok7FWUBvkpfC3dUTzECh5C8wB+XtTSL6LqOmaDF8pDTwQjw7om5Uit4G9EBkQOWohCdv d4Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=JR7cLHO09EGOsKZZI7U12mjbKqN8Y6fQj+0sYMqZxYo=; b=SFcqkWH5gHn+iOk0+ASURKe1h7R0JuAN2k96fTslChsnEN91de2V5EYpl1pfY+g/FW pkJ4KGcMUkwGfMlD8NZyeH03b6ah8rsnGtv+PNmGQj03WfdNTm2GflzEVBC5i0DyYJxA 76TwrpFqdQWlso7lZ1CnQUGS3FCcfTQHhjSmyLjRTJ+w/viH9XXpww3ychwPdUrcd961 mDMmBCLXH6BSC1Bf/sXzjWDhQR7xiQV2XtyBG4FHO7x6MA6wQK4oXtmPwMDDlk1TMF/f S68iaVRZGgYhrsTOMvoEDJKwnmyLrzT6wauz7FdkIjct5skj2kvl2XHoOVy+Y2lm9U6J 0CtA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMqH5Z00k1GzmyJ+J4BUdCsN8stwbwAdbYxIWVy57qscLAV2/RCAd1MzGBQWVEUjA== X-Received: by 10.28.63.205 with SMTP id m196mr169088wma.20.1472760040882; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.28.168.146 with SMTP id r140ls1060wme.12.canary; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.209.3 with SMTP id i3mr59366wmg.7.1472760040397; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p199si368201wmd.1.2016.09.01.13.00.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::231; Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b199so69047987lfe.0 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.25.24.164 with SMTP id 36mr1691105lfy.103.1472760039635; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.3.203 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:00:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2b72a2dc-cbf9-4426-aa8a-dee3a4e30ace@googlegroups.com> From: uakci Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:00:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] elidable terminators and ambiguity To: mriste Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411290007f72053b77abc8 X-Original-Sender: ciuak.prog@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ciuak.prog@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ciuak.prog@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11411290007f72053b77abc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nah, it doesn't work that way. First, =C2=ABmi noi le mlatu sisku cu sipna= =C2=BB parses successfully. It means 'Me, whom the cat sleeps' (whatever the idea of a sleeped thing is). Second, Lojban doesn't have this notion of 'if this happens, then that doesn't parse'. If your =C2=ABku=C2=BB hasn't been close= d, the =C2=ABle=C2=BB will eat more than you want it to, even at the occasional co= sts of not parsing. ~ uakci On Sep 1, 2016 8:15 PM, wrote: > The {cu} is not elidable, it is optional, but leaving it in tends to make > a lot of other things elidable. > > The reason that {ku} should be elidable (based on the rule) is that there > is unambiguously only one place that the required {ku} could occupy. > The phrase {mlatu sisku} can not be a tanru because {noi},{kuho} must > enclose a bridi, and {le mlatu sisku ku keha vau} is not a bridi. > That clause no verb. > > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 4:02:51 PM UTC-7, Andrew wrote: >> >> The reason you can't leave out {ku} in {le mlatu ku sisku} is because it >> is already omitting {cu}. The longest form of this phrase would be {le >> mlatu ku cu sisku}. Most people pretty much always omit either {ku} or >> {cu}, but you need at least one between the x1 and the selbri. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11411290007f72053b77abc8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nah, it doesn't work that way. First, =C2=ABmi noi le ml= atu sisku cu sipna=C2=BB parses successfully. It means 'Me, whom the ca= t sleeps' (whatever the idea of a sleeped thing is). Second, Lojban doe= sn't have this notion of 'if this happens, then that doesn't pa= rse'. If your =C2=ABku=C2=BB hasn't been closed, the =C2=ABle=C2=BB= will eat more than you want it to, even at the occasional costs of not par= sing.

~ uakci


On Sep 1, 2016 8:= 15 PM, <vpbroman@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
The {cu} is not elidable, it is optional, but leaving it in tends to = make a lot of other things elidable.

The reason that {ku} should be = elidable (based on the rule) is that there is unambiguously only one place = that the required {ku} could occupy.
The phrase {mlatu sisku} can not be= a tanru because {noi},{kuho} must enclose a bridi, and {le mlatu sisku ku = keha vau} is not a bridi.
That clause no verb.

On Friday, August= 26, 2016 at 4:02:51 PM UTC-7, Andrew wrote:
The reason you can't leave out {ku} in {le ml= atu ku sisku} is because it is already omitting {cu}. The longest form of t= his phrase would be {le mlatu ku cu sisku}. Most people pretty much always = omit either {ku} or {cu}, but you need at least one between the x1 and the = selbri.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11411290007f72053b77abc8--