Received: from mail-pf0-f192.google.com ([209.85.192.192]:34041) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bjAts-00058i-QU for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:52 -0700 Received: by mail-pf0-f192.google.com with SMTP id q28sf4509738pfj.1 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-length:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/sCJcFf1W7ejrpTSHSi5A8J2KPz+UCA3Y01rKKcneGU=; b=THeU7h1GFvXSFSO3LWQOCvgrM0p4AND2x6Q0mhAr6eu5qh9lUJTdAWBzAoP++8UXGd xod1EX3/qsSGga70e+3pXLsKU6YTezNPubFdIEIINTdgzqm+T0dZV+1wCua+1vIafsBD euvy0xlBe6kRTIOGvYfowli52/3kuqxvydMOe8vq679P0Xj/oUV1Pq4KwwD3P14OBo5c 9fLpf2zIGIVtjTt436hMPxZpWXFqvdV4Ng7QIgzd44Z90iG03AEWvIeOg9qo2iOB/3Av 5bKww7OHkU3ZA/csFarCTqam9YRKsMpRTHneSv+L/W1vHIzpXJFNUunhoQkFycNdaXg1 xKDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-length:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/sCJcFf1W7ejrpTSHSi5A8J2KPz+UCA3Y01rKKcneGU=; b=NKw54YvJp1Ip63qOV3siegG3ekwIZS5d6oeeY/YHLbag3sKMTVFA9pgZNBeqpg2SGg PYFAJMVC0aWB7Ykx3YgWYWm8vUYQtVOaVZnUAL9lacYm3kHmgTJ/NhyRGyiOmh4vp/5h zEjBq7PuM12Z+0WjuD8EdzuvfJqT/BUfOo4QW0IGpPOHiis9KRtmplvS7aYA0Ms9cAtZ zm6x+bI6WpxGgHyz7Y7LEtpgPgn6DsRg/dFP7ImvyIv5BZRMu8fUVuvgOLbXP9D3KqXE 748Swh7nOIIxmafkXVZkeku8rSAeLzQJv1FCoJdi20jh/lOhikdgu6fX83bTy2+sux1a 3VXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMgWTE5yHe0vbAClSB+ij7erY2t6sLO0B0HvPPP8zPdH+DcX427/NbQth5tSbUu4w== X-Received: by 10.36.6.18 with SMTP id 18mr198888itv.8.1473623922602; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.36.69.204 with SMTP id c73ls931158itd.22.gmail; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.249.36 with SMTP id yr4mr13170864pac.16.1473623920785; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm48-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm48-vm9.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com. [67.195.87.229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h124si1827057pfe.0.2016.09.11.12.58.40 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.229 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.195.87.229; Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm48.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Sep 2016 19:58:40 -0000 Received: from [216.39.60.181] by nm48.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Sep 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Received: from [66.196.81.173] by tm17.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Sep 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.200] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Sep 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1009.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Sep 2016 19:55:43 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 29575.60683.bm@omp1009.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: B5Ur8ZYVM1nclsCXpvNisQGBTfH_b8SVhuGLXEE8t9qUOFCmx1dYrrqYsxLfJg5 bseACZ1lwKTuck8A1vOQdLxRTJb4okyqxfX6okqLW4dM8O_NBXByA.432AxitCsL5DifFtSPKVcv fz3.fdUmPkD1TvozTgMohDsFcYv7aYBTO3SRPj9yUusG2votELF.bSonekhJeP9BoS1Jsfh3WGZb 1yVbIPsU4sm5gDQMC1XC5CYXxMj0XVHBamZ8.tCBFDxOboDq6eISBTyJJAbpvT2IJxbJTs7N3eIn MGFda1vNd.MxEHYOS4UOiMn5vlCNjaYFZDeHTIcjvFlK1yxbrwvcGWAsqVSQMmdb4qfEyGbfmMHA V.41WEDwP9Lv3NS6G.WMSawfrhlZbBl8G_acTD3yyJjD2rV6EUJSyqnAVh5OAz1VimKpU94j7J6A FqiHjeQeTlCicuMnHJDBnFLEv0aJ5IIKdbqC5ncdoxYS4nx3a5K7zBYV8U52x3hAfc1tWYJBIUfL U2KcBuddRrcWri.M5JLtN82ODZlf7kbqxFml36TVqraPd63mlfT6F_UdALKdZOJcv2afgGg24epY- Received: from jws10663.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws102.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 19:55:42 +0000; 1473623742.666 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 19:55:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "'John E Clifford' via lojban" Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" Message-ID: <1988663459.3238110.1473623741795@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban] the death of this place MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3238109_824940017.1473623741641" Content-Length: 9753 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.229 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com X-Original-From: John E Clifford Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_3238109_824940017.1473623741641 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable While I am not sure what "more interesting" logics Logjam can't handle, the= general point here seems about right. =C2=A0That machine translation has t= aken the down and dirty bilingual approach rather the interlingual is unfor= tunate (in the long run and for broader uses) but has always been the case.= =C2=A0The rest pretty much follows. =C2=A0Of course, going to a better "lo= gical language" won't help that situation much, nor the international langu= age one. =C2=A0Still, it remains an ideal that Loglan (and so Lojban) threw= away on day one and that could be developed from scratch (well, bits and p= ieces of it have been done over on engelang over the years). =C2=A0Starting= from a developed logic (say a Montague intensional system) and proceeding = by reversible transformations step by step, one could achieve a speakable l= anguage fairly quickly. =C2=A0Certainly more quickly than the Logjam proced= ure of starting with a speakable language (i.e. basically English with stra= nge flourishes) and trying to build something like a logical system out of = it (60 years and still not certainly successful). Of course, just what cons= titutes a speakable language (and just why an intensional logic lexicalized= isn't one) constitutes an initial problem to be dealt with early on, as do= es the exact formulation of the logic, since there are several competitors,= not all obviously equivalent. =C2=A0A nice task for another couple generat= ions, not, happily, mine any more. =C2=A0pycyn, from before creation. =C2= =A0=20 On Sunday, September 11, 2016 1:33 PM, Thomas Porter wrote: =20 #yiv7902445184 #yiv7902445184 -- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}#yiv7902= 445184 What did you expect to happen? Lojban serves no purpose as a scientific endeavor since the Sapir-Worf Hypo= thesis has been discredited by other means. It serves no purpose as a machi= ne interlanguage because artificial intelligence projects are focusing on n= atural language processing. It serves little purpose as spoken logic becaus= e it can't handle more complex or "interesting" logics.=C2=A0And it has nev= er, despite some people's desires, been suited as an international auxiliar= y language. Lojban is a hobby language with an aging community that has little time for= hobbies.=C2=A0 If anything, this is a sign that we need to begin a new logical language th= at learns from the failures of the Loglan and Lojban projects.--=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_3238109_824940017.1473623741641 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While I am not sure wh= at "more interesting" logics Logjam can't handle, the general point here se= ems about right.  That machine translation has taken the down and dirt= y bilingual approach rather the interlingual is unfortunate (in the long ru= n and for broader uses) but has always been the case.  The rest pretty= much follows.  Of course, going to a better "logical language" won't = help that situation much, nor the international language one.  Still, = it remains an ideal that Loglan (and so Lojban) threw away on day one and t= hat could be developed from scratch (well, bits and pieces of it have been = done over on engelang over the years).  Starting from a developed logi= c (say a Montague intensional system) and proceeding by reversible transfor= mations step by step, one could achieve a speakable language fairly quickly= .  Certainly more quickly than the Logjam procedure of starting with a= speakable language (i.e. basically English with strange flourishes) and tr= ying to build something like a logical system out of it (60 years and still= not certainly successful). Of course, just what constitutes a speakable la= nguage (and just why an intensional logic lexicalized isn't one) constitute= s an initial problem to be dealt with early on, as does the exact formulati= on of the logic, since there are several competitors, not all obviously equ= ivalent.  A nice task for another couple generations, not, happily, mi= ne any more.  
pycyn, from before creation.  


On Sunday, September 11, 2016 1:33 PM, Thomas Porter <osiris_hades_d= eathland@hotmail.com> wrote: