Received: from mail-oi0-f62.google.com ([209.85.218.62]:34142) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bsdle-00027l-7g for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:30 -0700 Received: by mail-oi0-f62.google.com with SMTP id r132sf23621397oig.1 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=KurFjw2jsdc1aA1bXJJeVGAYnO7zVOCbtcVDaH8XWdM=; b=KV+ohNK4xDQ8TWEF4lhQWQDhHBlA2XI+Go9CoyqIV05GCPuXvlWvJhE0fuLcVkLb1D cOQcM+EaBuGERCstSpxEFUJzRbonWbCEyULQuTqLJRZFkWn+/SBVO/XOlvHj8nRhpDgm 8XtNrKarbOJLtCoK2SSwo1GNmWcOPFyjlcv4nVogHjjOTdgyXmw+7FzXYDX4gVE7BY8c DCYVEZ9F1QzHfmZxFb9NbXHn3JRQ/ncsoWHsQfeijmsWRzEh0eKZBh0NL01EZAHJBgMd 2luFRzC8SN08Pm3nriOBKwn6F9nHdoI6H6kx8i4GdMwfyEw8fB3/olCK2lOv5PBZgbX7 Je8Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=KurFjw2jsdc1aA1bXJJeVGAYnO7zVOCbtcVDaH8XWdM=; b=Ad6TR5UEiXNVdIzU4TjFpstgKnCpCieUB26sa/O+IXCcuLaTdpiuEsR6gWJ4HTAisS VldKyQVbylAps7m2eKEStEpMHBUNU+2MLfb6ViK1JcOOvL3AQYLT4zPKo16HLaVMz/S6 WAowxfQZRl9V3bdLqwUyVlJAp9QLF+k6bau2bpzt+ufxaLQbyZ2gbV6atQLD2djHkK/V WLrFSXCk0gEzoNbY/EglT1uh9SY7/GGoqhIBxNRZzTrePSvqDSoJP/NVzNwyhoFrJ25z pxJiwhqGLj9CN1iAn107D4XyK7tsO48sLjRIqt9wRe1hqEclx5SLXwXHZVYceEt9Xbek j69g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=KurFjw2jsdc1aA1bXJJeVGAYnO7zVOCbtcVDaH8XWdM=; b=ZgaIjxd/lxRUDw0MkSDFtcdP1xz90yjSUyIg6rX5ZFKMtxZaomvrcS7U0e/PcDV4Jo FBTpB8jIIj9+fpXwVBaiGZyWjH6lJg4SulnL9YXnDyQMEyeWJ9Bs+krLvzjP+QK4P0hD q/F9ZGugNTFifXf7xjgPA1kbv4jgN0PHZGdmU+XYSPy3W7bck/fdmihFeGCjm0HhtsYT qI/t03nbM4KUOdicMSgYN3wdTPLVnanPR0GARiGzu7Ie7lPU7mcHwbUM/skBrliztSOu onevwcVw5Vopaa58uRMzv6ODZU7okJsUJUzNEhIFL3pfDePfGe+VLKbCI3kYoxYLnID3 J/Iw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkPuZhG8E2yIqz9XXxqW5UKTVRDrexP9mVmic7/LUlfoWJpAn2rEg7mXJ9Rnycw0g== X-Received: by 10.157.51.3 with SMTP id f3mr2365116otc.4.1475879840270; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.56.29 with SMTP id i29ls6205695otc.12.gmail; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.40.176 with SMTP id s45mr5844864ota.142.1475879839972; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17si542709ywy.1.2016.10.07.15.37.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d; Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f128so35489967qkb.1 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.96.7 with SMTP id u7mr14514911qkb.189.1475879839502; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:37:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.38.230 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:37:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3cb1fc04-c3d0-3535-099e-30b8b120f219@gmx.de> References: <3cb1fc04-c3d0-3535-099e-30b8b120f219@gmx.de> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:37:18 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] A Simpler Quantifier Logic (blog article) To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c056212909529053e4e0d58 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jjllambias@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_bar: - --94eb2c056212909529053e4e0d58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, selpahi wrote: > > https://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/a-simpler-quantifier-logic/ Nice. I agree with most of it, although I'm not too sure yet what I think about ro and su'o becoming ro'oi and su'oi. Have you thought about "su'e"? Presumably it should pattern with "ru'o", not with "ro'oi", so the su'o/su'e symmetry would be broken if su'o becomes su'oi. Would "no" become "no'oi" as well? We should also have explicit definitions for me'i, za'u, da'a, so'a, so'e, etc since they all admit more than one pluralification, but I'm guessing they would all follow the "ru'o" pattern as well. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --94eb2c056212909529053e4e0d58 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, selpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> = wrote:

https://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/a-simpler-quantifier-logic/

Nice. I agree with most of it, although I'm not too sure yet wh= at I think about ro and su'o becoming ro'oi and su'oi.

Have you thought about "su'e"? Presumably it= should pattern with "ru'o", not with "ro'oi", = so the su'o/su'e symmetry would be broken if su'o becomes su= 9;oi.

Would "no" become "no'oi&= quot; as well?=C2=A0

We should also have explicit = definitions for me'i, za'u, da'a, so'a, so'e, etc since= they all admit more than one pluralification, but I'm guessing they wo= uld all follow the "ru'o" pattern as well.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--94eb2c056212909529053e4e0d58--