Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=69.168.97.48;
X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Q7zrveGa c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=5n1d6GSJGnnyfnXdd0Hfiw==:117 a=5n1d6GSJGnnyfnXdd0Hfiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=TmhLZMgRQS1D_nBv1CQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 174.109.123.133 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org)
Received: from [174.109.123.133] ([174.109.123.133:35717] helo=bezitopo.org)
	by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <phma@bezitopo.org>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) 
	id 69/B5-17597-39E5D085; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:06:27 -0400
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B05FD90
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] A Simpler Quantifier Logic (blog article)
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 21:06:15 -0400
Message-ID: <2381886.UWGjblIpOV@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-38-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2dJjE=-W=J4RR70pZw001PxE=xe1si_6KJoPsJ+YD_TOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3cb1fc04-c3d0-3535-099e-30b8b120f219@gmx.de> <ee747dc2-a781-55f6-a65e-e86718692119@gmx.de> <CAO7tK2dJjE=-W=J4RR70pZw001PxE=xe1si_6KJoPsJ+YD_TOA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 69.168.97.48 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mailfrom=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <https://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <https://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <https://groups.google.com/group/lojban
List-Subscribe: <https://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <https://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.8
X-Spam_score_int: -17
X-Spam_bar: -

On Monday, October 10, 2016 5:03:16 PM EDT Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:45 PM, selpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 10.10.2016 02:08, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:
> >> And singular "no" is then "no pa", right?
> >=20
> > Yes, I would say so.
>=20
> I don't know if it's a good idea to use the same word for the digit "0" a=
nd
> the (plural) quantifier "~E".
>=20
> It could be confusing that "no pa no" is "no ten" rather than "010".

"no pa" is equal to "pa". Do you mean "no boi pa"?

Pierre
--=20
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.