Received: from mail-ua0-f187.google.com ([209.85.217.187]:34639) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byTul-0001gP-WF for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:19:03 -0700 Received: by mail-ua0-f187.google.com with SMTP id m26sf2276236uaa.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+WO8IQtsiunm/Ext/XSCpt5dg1w3XiTVjOyeHqHVzUU=; b=EihiW+k+1b1BzYMvgJhxpYSL+frTfs8R61XpCMeCW0wCe1BhOoFIaOlh9DxwjplmCG 4zmZjOqPWDQ5FW9B6YhZoOWLow0kh6jRRGZtRZcVbdkctemz8WIyDuJh6bo0X4qcvXIl 159NFwpMccBzDkPjldBFOMXFDzM9GyRuHZf/3Lh+x3Ya7QN7Lau1tbfQH8yzZZac44Lj 4CwwUNuRtPJYwYlcovSH+yaoK+RmKK5QjF6FZuP9AGxVEMJvpb1KRFPbMlBQBglI85wt JuNRkdveg3xIrF8J2j92kutWtHUfxFJ7zPQ6Jnl/WevYRhzxZnffCqqr9RzjiR0aESjt oKYQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+WO8IQtsiunm/Ext/XSCpt5dg1w3XiTVjOyeHqHVzUU=; b=EH66NTI1Ykxo3pFkj0ZAGKi79epDMEJeY68HGt/rd90kzZ6ix7IirYNHWsDGNkdY+e mYi6jbUit7QcF+GZUU26xAd09kuOYwsNijljFqUsAxeknxXWmEW0O6l0qiyOaa4auMRx ITTTrJztGH3808hoi1kmFAyeBEOOH6mpPikAMPukHLKpwQD5n1qDytg2Pq3ufxpxvs9T Q0Xi4wHfDEhpu9JisTfAoMdeU2FHVN5z7/1vcjspb8mJS+RorsdaOts3iNatBCg47mik ZcfHSkya9Qo+um4K7Dzhp40+s+80yFGi3Ewree0UoyrMfQxIZClQIG09HB4qbdBKdUyZ BwNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+WO8IQtsiunm/Ext/XSCpt5dg1w3XiTVjOyeHqHVzUU=; b=lezvwqt78y3dmfOLzg1gTxpx4jNQqWRL+CPP2cfdPEjpbqdw+5/pycWvCmyaEpej9V tr3v4oq9GOyFtVCckaYQHueL2ORLSji6yQFp/ounpjcdjcWpudI0HrcRXZ+2p1hr9gGi 8Fvo9Ac6Si0tJMcnczfimac/5toHJrewckmyQCHRITd7jPxWCeCOYUyjl3A7gNwX4NO+ xSujBhWZHJpkwhdNEwX+NYWv7Y5C2TSff8JwVmwoaONaqLWtl83DZogYSLODaCmocgJC 7HcLwFxqbBiobEC0JjCnCYY1q8OXIeS2+kKD2ehaYTjfcUlBrEA62jCpndwEtYbfI0zq eZLA== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc1s1EGeK8JyoOqI/9ObCnn96kAgJeSVHO6O39mCeUgT57gEwvxEnEK0cJZ8BAYZw== X-Received: by 10.36.116.208 with SMTP id o199mr12734itc.6.1477271933947; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.34.148 with SMTP id i142ls3808064ioi.7.gmail; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.166.133 with SMTP id p127mr10063594ioe.5.1477271932324; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17si837836ywy.1.2016.10.23.18.18.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234; Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x11so8783116qka.1 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.21.206 with SMTP id 75mr11599408qkv.73.1477271931997; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.38.226 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2381886.UWGjblIpOV@caracal> References: <3cb1fc04-c3d0-3535-099e-30b8b120f219@gmx.de> <2381886.UWGjblIpOV@caracal> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 22:18:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] A Simpler Quantifier Logic (blog article) To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147ee40be61a3053f922c80 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jjllambias@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_bar: - --001a1147ee40be61a3053f922c80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Monday, October 10, 2016 5:03:16 PM EDT Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:45 PM, selpahi wrote: > > > On 10.10.2016 02:08, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: > > >> And singular "no" is then "no pa", right? > > > > > > Yes, I would say so. > > > > I don't know if it's a good idea to use the same word for the digit "0" > and > > the (plural) quantifier "~E". > > > > It could be confusing that "no pa no" is "no ten" rather than "010". > > "no pa" is equal to "pa". Do you mean "no boi pa"? > No, I did mean "no'oi pa" which would become "no pa" if "no'oi" was replaced by "no". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a1147ee40be61a3053f922c80 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= un, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org> wrote:
On Monday, October 10,= 2016 5:03:16 PM EDT Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:45 PM, selpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 10.10.2016 02:08, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:
> >> And singular "no" is = then "no pa", right?
> >
> > Yes, I would say so.
>
> I don't know if it's a good idea to use the same word for the = digit "0" and
> the (plural) quantifier "~E".
>
> It could be confusing that "no pa no" is "no ten" = rather than "010".

"no pa" is equal to "pa". Do you mean "no b= oi pa"?

No, I did mean "no= 9;oi pa" which would become "no pa" if "no'oi"= was replaced by "no".

mu'o mi'e xorxe= s

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a1147ee40be61a3053f922c80--