Received: from mail-vk0-f58.google.com ([209.85.213.58]:33479) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c6vBj-0002uC-Gy for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:32 -0800 Received: by mail-vk0-f58.google.com with SMTP id x186sf42895021vkd.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Ees571zupFwx4zADxFhCk3zV03O65k0gjM46cFg1qaI=; b=NdxOoquQXY/gd0T929rlEdBYpOimh12Jw1GOLW2ANacBhD5Uu9hZHhr5u8nCmDUwzP 5wLX2msyVnRDw65x2NMRYc99NooGqpPss0HBcGZN7XDYIKKBzghzfePG4I8o37Ghj9GY 8pi/1I6tEuWnX2ZO7GVscaf6lctQhyv1Vp85Yo/JPLagA07hPjl8am43I1t8RkDjnpuC aH1+R70TRzPbte0pE3lIpmA4INhpz32tuhS6KrHQKjsUGxHfpI9BXr9bIgoXR3LhpyIn ao4Ls0HgbKEXixNJxrDe3OUqcVZ1tRPpwQ5m4htd8H3lTpcaIT1Aa0Z7QrThMyqzOwxK ZNRg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Ees571zupFwx4zADxFhCk3zV03O65k0gjM46cFg1qaI=; b=F4xAAkEDYUUQ+EoymH/u0tzn7we5WCVeW8WfJoZ86vptRcNNfmLJ40vfQYHqrD5VOF xlMcZRTvReft2bn8tSOtE7cHR7w1QXYGtcRCtqxUq0JB5Wn7Pnv+bolfqJOD7FYUp6rQ Zv6LGwbBNOeKZoCAqRC5+InmXL8Rw2QH8mPKCX+7fHvrCRqI+J/ZF4VKFlV48VGmtI51 i4PLiV/YkmzXmwmlZDiCYXr5qgm8i91NnXZLF90svklyv9zJxellLDY/t0vS/0NjGRau MkICWqsFZnew1vYTU7JiBNA8ms9tVgngZuh1ahXtjrE1zDadmOTJsJ6EVilAvbSIyvPq It5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=Ees571zupFwx4zADxFhCk3zV03O65k0gjM46cFg1qaI=; b=WSOLBeXjtTMxgEmSTyAliBGkXKFkojBGPTGxwZ1vVNpJI5eykbIiQ/tT7zX+1cANWS bfxG9p0BnSgytcMv540JnzuWcf2pGApUJ+eTShoHVdnIl5Y6TY7k3OCgtrXL2A8RV2Y4 GaJehplHgKFnLBOWyS+vl63cZzOPogkpMcwQ2uFw16CoAgFB8OipFNL4MCPuhmkDzPuy Kr1U3f1eX/O3bDKBotzoYOlyBkxkIQ68i26ptDW4VF2uCZJh8vEfgb0qCNozin+c1l6A i3tytJKACBeIRnpaFM3wtzRK/q1z5sDz0iy4yF0NSLOmEwPKoCGCigXPW9LQkwWOMbEI +N7w== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfuLB5wMezwm3oISq//jStbfaAckAZTOkpxLs/B9FaZo82ek/QJ/REzFJIJVmiOuw== X-Received: by 10.157.17.3 with SMTP id g3mr1133873ote.8.1479283397407; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:17 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.56.82 with SMTP id r18ls655604otd.5.gmail; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:17 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.15.143 with SMTP id d15mr2053633otd.2.1479283396977; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:16 -0800 (PST) From: guskant To: lojban Message-Id: <9aaf1336-a33a-45e2-a7e4-892fdf635031@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: Young ex-presidents and abandoned houses MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_4459_1661640735.1479283396384" X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_4459_1661640735.1479283396384 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4460_670400355.1479283396384" ------=_Part_4460_670400355.1479283396384 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mardi 15 novembre 2016 13:43:40 UTC, selpa'i a =C3=A9crit : > > Adjectival participles.=20 > > Lojban does not have them, but let's look at the known options for=20 > translating phrases such as "to be a young ex-president" and "to be an=20 > abandoned house". What these have in common is that they contain two=20 > tanru units, at least one of which wants to be preceded by a=20 > tense/aspect/modal. This is not grammatically possible, because=20 > tense/aspect/modal tags apply to entire selbri and not to tanru units,=20 > and they cannot appear in the middle of a tanru. The following=20 > work-arounds are known to be available:=20 > > 1) BE: {citno jatna be ba'o ku}, {se cliva be ba'o ku zdadi'u}=20 > 2) POI'I: {citno poi'i [ke'a] ba'o jatna kei}, {poi'i [ke'a] ba'o se=20 > cliva kei zdadi'u}=20 > 3) ZEI: {citno ba'o-zei-jatna}, {ba'o-zei-selcliva zdadi'u}=20 > 4) lujvo, but this only works with a few tags=20 > 5) GU'E (and possibly {ke}): {gu'e citno gi ba'o jatna} (not allowed),=20 > {gu'e ba'o se cliva gi zdadi'u} (allowed)=20 > 6) ME LO: {citno me lo ba'o jatna}, {me lo ba'o se cliva poi [ke'a]=20 > zdadi'u} / {me lo ba'o se cliva me'u zdadi'u}=20 > > Option 1 is ugly to me because of the change in word order and the {ku}.= =20 > Option 2 is very flexible and very verbose and very complex (it=20 > increases the nesting by one level)=20 > Option 3 is not practical when the tanru unit consists of more than one= =20 > brivla (e.g. {se jai broda} or {na'e se broda}) as {zei} would then have= =20 > to be placed between all the words.=20 > Option 4 is not at all general.=20 > Option 5 has potential but requires forethought, and {gu'e} also can=20 > claims too much, since it merges all the places, not just the x1 (just=20 > like {je}).=20 > Option 6 needlessly involves a sumti, which seems backwards to me,=20 > because I believe that predicates should be the base case and sumti=20 > should be derived from them, and not vice versa.=20 > > If tag + tanru_unit yielded a tanru_unit instead of a selbri, then=20 > {(citno (ba'o jatna))} would be a valid tanru, as would {(ba'o se cliva= =20 > (zdadi'u))}. However, this would require a lot more {cu} everywhere,=20 > specifically anywhere TAG was used in place of {cu} to close all the=20 > preceding constructs.=20 > > I am looking for practical solutions to this rather commonly encountered= =20 > problem.=20 > > ~~~mi'e la solpa'i=20 > Option 2 is satisfactory to me, but you may want a simpler way for {ba'o=20 jatna} being a tanru unit. Then I would suggest adding a new cmavo to=20 selma'o JAI. I call it {jo'ai} here. 7) {jo'ai} in JAI: {citno jo'ai ba'o jatna}, {jo'ai ba'o se cliva zdadi'u} {jo'ai} is in the grammatical nature of JAI, but the first place of the=20 resulting tanru unit does not change, differently from {jai}.=20 mi'e la guskant jo'au juxre glico=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_4460_670400355.1479283396384 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Le mardi 15 novembre 2016 13:43:40 UTC, selpa'= i a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
Adjectiva= l participles.

Lojban does not have them, but let's look at the known options for= =20
translating phrases such as "to be a young ex-president" and = "to be an=20
abandoned house". What these have in common is that they contain t= wo=20
tanru units, at least one of which wants to be preceded by a=20
tense/aspect/modal. This is not grammatically possible, because=20
tense/aspect/modal tags apply to entire selbri and not to tanru units,= =20
and they cannot appear in the middle of a tanru. The following=20
work-arounds are known to be available:

1) BE: {citno jatna be ba'o ku}, {se cliva be ba'o ku zdadi'= ;u}
2) POI'I: {citno poi'i [ke'a] ba'o jatna kei}, {poi'= ;i [ke'a] ba'o se=20
cliva kei zdadi'u}
3) ZEI: {citno ba'o-zei-jatna}, {ba'o-zei-selcliva zdadi'u}
4) lujvo, but this only works with a few tags
5) GU'E (and possibly {ke}): {gu'e citno gi ba'o jatna} (no= t allowed),=20
{gu'e ba'o se cliva gi zdadi'u} (allowed)
6) ME LO: {citno me lo ba'o jatna}, {me lo ba'o se cliva poi [k= e'a]=20
zdadi'u} / {me lo ba'o se cliva me'u zdadi'u}

Option 1 is ugly to me because of the change in word order and the {ku}= .
Option 2 is very flexible and very verbose and very complex (it=20
increases the nesting by one level)
Option 3 is not practical when the tanru unit consists of more than one= =20
brivla (e.g. {se jai broda} or {na'e se broda}) as {zei} would then= have=20
to be placed between all the words.
Option 4 is not at all general.
Option 5 has potential but requires forethought, and {gu'e} also ca= n=20
claims too much, since it merges all the places, not just the x1 (just= =20
like {je}).
Option 6 needlessly involves a sumti, which seems backwards to me,=20
because I believe that predicates should be the base case and sumti=20
should be derived from them, and not vice versa.

If tag + tanru_unit yielded a tanru_unit instead of a selbri, then=20
{(citno (ba'o jatna))} would be a valid tanru, as would {(ba'o = se cliva=20
(zdadi'u))}. However, this would require a lot more {cu} everywhere= ,=20
specifically anywhere TAG was used in place of {cu} to close all the=20
preceding constructs.

I am looking for practical solutions to this rather commonly encountere= d=20
problem.

~~~mi'e la solpa'i


Option 2 is satisfactory to= me, but you may want a simpler way for {ba'o jatna} being a tanru unit= . Then I would suggest adding a new cmavo to selma'o JAI. I call it {jo= 'ai} here.
7) {jo'ai} in JAI: {citno jo'ai ba'o j= atna}, {jo'ai ba'o se cliva zdadi'u}

{= jo'ai} is in the grammatical nature of JAI, but the first place of the = resulting tanru unit does not change, differently from {jai}.=C2=A0

mi'e la guskant jo'au juxre glico=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_4460_670400355.1479283396384-- ------=_Part_4459_1661640735.1479283396384--