Received: from mail-it0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:33622) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c71uC-0005kc-NV for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:48 -0800 Received: by mail-it0-f61.google.com with SMTP id c20sf6742661itb.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kpC9f/IxZBd7Q+quxsLw/iz3AztVK2eTpspfNJy7Ei0=; b=Q8Bai9YDrHk0rv0uupLkVljQKJKue9JYpRZMwIX4twy/c61ueQLofWuH0mMI7QmzOH uhCaDnlnjjXN4/HkFVIF/AolPs/Oh1oIILO6YkkmWpUgShxcNjuZ/q/jFCjCbzSf06Qn 2ehOtRg1ADNWH+RQKLJ6yozC49HHYqLpaBNkn+V7zJ6ZDiyHpgvb7HzSJC4by+CsN+ei KDjGp60ufGQynHDvbYTESyLjfEBNya/enKjiu0NZ3Udsu2uoTyEFQ35EWqlyduYrdbkZ SZQWPq2GIubnOmLNgh+MECDs3Ofiw/ApHfv72afIMYd90aaz8g0BJI+GpCBoi6oEU6/B 9LwA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kpC9f/IxZBd7Q+quxsLw/iz3AztVK2eTpspfNJy7Ei0=; b=c882K+XtiqZHS3nyVeKW2fGqcDEVGLk0cv5ZUu3cB92LQenwOW9kIMESwy2uua/nSd mWz/bx7BTcUoIEHc5ZnGabS2n//m/P82R2D0X9us+/zxUeRP0o8ZnK65a9Y7lqs79L19 Bt0i1xPXEesrIUWRdmm1FrRIJnKhcjXq0UsbHMrF80tKKU6QPx1HezHzjYMgklg5hslx AFuAyVRDXwn2ZvPLThfSotuRpDQoehXSp8eeliijU573qMY4XceB8VbXmq76vCGXCH6h A0MkfTw86ga0znOMS3ZLUe6JfuOHhf/5eu/7KMeHCHdWAj+Juu0OMpvQr1Y9+ZYcNWvS 7uFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kpC9f/IxZBd7Q+quxsLw/iz3AztVK2eTpspfNJy7Ei0=; b=P/o+xUL+0bqPfVDMPfS1AtZAi997yyHE131K8U8gsCaTGYuZZ0Hdqrx2Pu6YAPTtYQ 6BnxZG/m4q9jl+gLFzG2w9iNn2DIOB5ZYYVfhLlkYTJPDZe8I26w2Lnyw1Wk/r2cW39u vOqzkn8xgU1CUIpbpkA/ETcl+LlPPmW6Z5t5SX8/e6fRUyC1gZPVj2X1Ax8xPX2sAL0B ziIWbWz+F+WhAsiMT6i3Cav0uERHuPt5DaMMYlSiM7sv/puQcYcaHA7NSi5l6ejaFdUN SES0um/AUL41JWe/EuKemgbembN8RQQdLwZOcWQaMOk/VALfaYs/s/BvZuDmwAs41lfm Briw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveC6WzHoTCCIcpQ2uByGw3sf3hPIXD620O9XQspynrefW80OVFT58ntbeGblfcsBg== X-Received: by 10.157.18.211 with SMTP id g77mr2016804otg.14.1479309218535; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.53.52 with SMTP id o49ls1482243otc.18.gmail; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.13.218.6 with SMTP id c6mr216426ywe.144.1479309218201; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b21si499528itc.0.2016.11.16.07.13.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230; Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b126so25355806oia.2 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.8.242 with SMTP id 105mr2452228otf.32.1479309217809; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:13:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.72.138 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:12:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael Turniansky Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:12:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Young ex-presidents and abandoned houses To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113596c870cd9105416c844d X-Original-Sender: Mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mturniansky@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- --001a113596c870cd9105416c844d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable selpa'i, You failed to mention one other workaround, using an almost-equivalent bridi for the tag -- citno ke purci jatna (don't know why I chose to respond to this email. I"m still reading email from lasst January. Xonsider yourself special) --gejyspa On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM, selpahi wrote: > Adjectival participles. > > Lojban does not have them, but let's look at the known options for > translating phrases such as "to be a young ex-president" and "to be an > abandoned house". What these have in common is that they contain two tanr= u > units, at least one of which wants to be preceded by a tense/aspect/modal= . > This is not grammatically possible, because tense/aspect/modal tags apply > to entire selbri and not to tanru units, and they cannot appear in the > middle of a tanru. The following work-arounds are known to be available: > > 1) BE: {citno jatna be ba'o ku}, {se cliva be ba'o ku zdadi'u} > 2) POI'I: {citno poi'i [ke'a] ba'o jatna kei}, {poi'i [ke'a] ba'o se cliv= a > kei zdadi'u} > 3) ZEI: {citno ba'o-zei-jatna}, {ba'o-zei-selcliva zdadi'u} > 4) lujvo, but this only works with a few tags > 5) GU'E (and possibly {ke}): {gu'e citno gi ba'o jatna} (not allowed), > {gu'e ba'o se cliva gi zdadi'u} (allowed) > 6) ME LO: {citno me lo ba'o jatna}, {me lo ba'o se cliva poi [ke'a] > zdadi'u} / {me lo ba'o se cliva me'u zdadi'u} > > Option 1 is ugly to me because of the change in word order and the {ku}. > Option 2 is very flexible and very verbose and very complex (it increases > the nesting by one level) > Option 3 is not practical when the tanru unit consists of more than one > brivla (e.g. {se jai broda} or {na'e se broda}) as {zei} would then have = to > be placed between all the words. > Option 4 is not at all general. > Option 5 has potential but requires forethought, and {gu'e} also can > claims too much, since it merges all the places, not just the x1 (just li= ke > {je}). > Option 6 needlessly involves a sumti, which seems backwards to me, becaus= e > I believe that predicates should be the base case and sumti should be > derived from them, and not vice versa. > > If tag + tanru_unit yielded a tanru_unit instead of a selbri, then {(citn= o > (ba'o jatna))} would be a valid tanru, as would {(ba'o se cliva > (zdadi'u))}. However, this would require a lot more {cu} everywhere, > specifically anywhere TAG was used in place of {cu} to close all the > preceding constructs. > > I am looking for practical solutions to this rather commonly encountered > problem. > > ~~~mi'e la solpa'i > > --- > Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a113596c870cd9105416c844d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
selpa'i,

=C2=A0 You failed to mention one other= workaround, using an almost-equivalent bridi for the tag -- citno ke purci= =C2=A0jatna

=C2=A0 =C2=A0(don't know why I chose =C2=A0to respo= nd to this email.=C2=A0 I"m still reading email from lasst January.=C2= =A0 Xonsider yourself special)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --gejyspa


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM, se= lpahi <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
Adjectival participles.

Lojban does not have them, but let's look at the known options for tran= slating phrases such as "to be a young ex-president" and "to= be an abandoned house". What these have in common is that they contai= n two tanru units, at least one of which wants to be preceded by a tense/as= pect/modal. This is not grammatically possible, because tense/aspect/modal = tags apply to entire selbri and not to tanru units, and they cannot appear = in the middle of a tanru. The following work-arounds are known to be availa= ble:

1) BE: {citno jatna be ba'o ku}, {se cliva be ba'o ku zdadi'u}<= br> 2) POI'I: {citno poi'i [ke'a] ba'o jatna kei}, {poi'i [= ke'a] ba'o se cliva kei zdadi'u}
3) ZEI: {citno ba'o-zei-jatna}, {ba'o-zei-selcliva zdadi'u}
4) lujvo, but this only works with a few tags
5) GU'E (and possibly {ke}): {gu'e citno gi ba'o jatna} (not al= lowed), {gu'e ba'o se cliva gi zdadi'u} (allowed)
6) ME LO: {citno me lo ba'o jatna}, {me lo ba'o se cliva poi [ke= 9;a] zdadi'u} / {me lo ba'o se cliva me'u zdadi'u}

Option 1 is ugly to me because of the change in word order and the {ku}. Option 2 is very flexible and very verbose and very complex (it increases t= he nesting by one level)
Option 3 is not practical when the tanru unit consists of more than one bri= vla (e.g. {se jai broda} or {na'e se broda}) as {zei} would then have t= o be placed between all the words.
Option 4 is not at all general.
Option 5 has potential but requires forethought, and {gu'e} also can cl= aims too much, since it merges all the places, not just the x1 (just like {= je}).
Option 6 needlessly involves a sumti, which seems backwards to me, because = I believe that predicates should be the base case and sumti should be deriv= ed from them, and not vice versa.

If tag + tanru_unit yielded a tanru_unit instead of a selbri, then {(citno = (ba'o jatna))} would be a valid tanru, as would {(ba'o se cliva (zd= adi'u))}. However, this would require a lot more {cu} everywhere, speci= fically anywhere TAG was used in place of {cu} to close all the preceding c= onstructs.

I am looking for practical solutions to this rather commonly encountered pr= oblem.

~~~mi'e la solpa'i

---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to
lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a113596c870cd9105416c844d--