Received: from mail-yw0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:33714) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cOJvP-0005Cr-LC for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:54:31 -0800 Received: by mail-yw0-f189.google.com with SMTP id s68sf80948292ywg.0 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:54:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=eLat0OoAFbWoSSt4vhYqjqJbNt68FR12NCY4gk+9Dsk=; b=a8XyNh1DgZrDRn1InCc5uHEWDpnbqHE5968heZ8wIlozNGvuZTtmyAgzBT2sty31ex gl7pDHozHHhvfiS555iPH4E3PyGzyroSbmX33GJhNiT9lLkc6LCj7BfnEWySCOpK1f/r 2tu0Yu5vRBxMbbSQZX2isvtk/w6NuXShMnS+kZp/UKDlEvq89QwP4C2swm2pGtQdfNj8 CeGEzNlW+55G7Z0jqF0ZDyhLzv5qzPwy1CpZEXaCZnNU6m02mFwaaEbpwCEEj+Eeo44t p87I/o/WMH99twuvL5k03IBp5o9c9i6w0ZQ4b1woWNqlnAyxmdJBKAnBjfrCShiWk32A 9y+Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=eLat0OoAFbWoSSt4vhYqjqJbNt68FR12NCY4gk+9Dsk=; b=DPiME7gSlQ6Og0mV7LaF7lR7uPUPOgNG49CSlT9O3tuGKcj0/A5qa6iYOfnTidnipO A+r0eRA6AH2tn+jV4zmiCceXJKuFa3OYspLd/GlxIvyOMOZHcjdlE5dn49RnIn4SKkFl 5lDkOEBm0uDAIVoIZ+qmOAWqqO+FMDYKNzbO5K1L0kwG8Q69tpkgBnJA7LCo0I3IwonM ukuEFmWQ8jRh3m9jdj3oJ7fjNifN4qgvLHINxriLocLv2l3RU2JrGaGKYxoPZES9hQ9v sk/yOcybMXO/wsBdA8hwUTiBI1ig6vUT1NziYFdL/ZwsPPE5HfOjHZ0vzCij201cWEGK EWEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=eLat0OoAFbWoSSt4vhYqjqJbNt68FR12NCY4gk+9Dsk=; b=EWcvgD+YZCFSQgjEs3Q6eC4Yvi3OPU9E4UTnkKUG9XNe25/vq3yVDuUn76uX61a0dc XDFBlifer1MSoqprUbA5sKNAIqo1cYvqjOPoeNFwV1fRdK9KUozxibVNy60dGRS7CAgC 9fiGVTiIH0wWYkfY813ngrNCkXGQMIcHfmNbx+EC4xrRxb3dyCubGx2mtj3MsJ33cPDz r2f64DWuVIbg2hmIOkp03FDK4aWZbTGs4q+voNN/ffyXdIY8gaxq7mGztPMoUxHMqE2O kb1fLzLak+GUNLnp7eL10+PLDRHM3TLGmKKwkaCeG9LkPI7IvBcZUOtVuWm97CqfCePf MFLw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJg1jQBIQmy22i7cC2ZdlHdqY+oo7eY+Q+tYHsW5OcmgAtsm7iFVB9MiZu6joIDrw== X-Received: by 10.157.40.132 with SMTP id s4mr1698230ota.7.1483430060875; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:54:20 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.63.53 with SMTP id m50ls45594105otc.10.gmail; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:54:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.1.105 with SMTP id 96mr2782842otu.5.1483430060593; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:54:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 23:54:20 -0800 (PST) From: Curtis Franks To: lojban Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <824d1785-ce59-bac7-1add-33e4e655ac21@gmx.de> References: <824d1785-ce59-bac7-1add-33e4e655ac21@gmx.de> Subject: [lojban] Re: NOIhA (blog article) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_4672_1727884767.1483430060145" X-Original-Sender: curtis.w.franks@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_4672_1727884767.1483430060145 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4673_2051729844.1483430060145" ------=_Part_4673_2051729844.1483430060145 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh, just an interesting note: "broda poi'a purci" is the correct re=C3=ABxpression for "pu broda". Tense = in=20 Lojban is aoristic; it happening in the past does not have any implications= =20 concerning that that action could not have continued into the present of=20 future, or that another event which could be described in otherwise=20 identical fashion cannot be happening (again) in the present or could not= =20 happen (again) in the future. The restrictive nature of "poi'a" encodes the= =20 possibility that other versions of what is otherwise the same bridi notion= =20 exist truthfully. (You got this correct, btw. I am just making an=20 observation, which I find interesting, for the record. It might even become= =20 handy for future discussions/lessons/introductions - or this one, if you=20 edit it (but I am not suggesting that you should do so)). This means that we now have a symmetric and easy way to express exclusive= =20 (non-aoristic) tenses. Before, we would have needed to include "po'o"=20 (example: ~"pu po'o broda") or to use negated AND connectives (example: "pu= =20 jenai ca jenai ba broda") in order to express this meaning. Now, we can=20 just use "noi'a" (example: "broda noi'a purci"). ___ I do worry about the interaction between "noi'a" with a temporal tense and= =20 other nontemporal tenses. Since space and time are symmetric in Lojbanic=20 treatment, saying that it happened only in the past might mean that it did= =20 not happen at any spatial location (because the only tense applicable is=20 the past, not any location tense). Likewise, "noi'a purci" (and nothing=20 more) might mean that the event occurred in the past and nothing else,=20 which means that it could not have occurred at any spatial location.=20 Clearly, both of these interpretations are nonsensical because 'events'=20 which occur must have done so both in some nonempty region of space and=20 during some nonempty interval of time. Now, in the "pu po'o" case, I think= =20 that this is a much more serious (although possibly circumventable)=20 problem; but in the "noi'a purci" case, it might be possible to make some= =20 sort of argument against it due to the nature of selbri/brivla. But I am=20 not sure. It still seems dangerous to me. On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 8:43:21 AM UTC-4, selpa'i wrote: > > The cmavo of selma'o NOIhA are all the hype right now =E2=80=94 everyone'= s=20 > talking about them.=20 > > I wish.=20 > > Somehow most people have never even heard of NOIhA. A good while ago, in= =20 > March 2016 to be exact, I wrote what was to this day the only written=20 > documentation of NOIhA out there. But... it's in Lojban:=20 > > http://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/zo-xoi-joi-lo-se-srana-be-ri=20 > > I think very few people have read that article. Shocking, I know!=20 > > Well, anyway.=20 > > Since I consider NOIhA absolutely necessary, the best way to raise=20 > awareness is to write about it in English. That is the purpose of the=20 > present article.=20 > > https://solpahi.wordpress.com/2016/10/13/noiha/=20 > > ---=20 > Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft.= =20 > https://www.avast.com/antivirus=20 > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_4673_2051729844.1483430060145 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh, just an interesting note:

"broda poi'a= purci" is the correct re=C3=ABxpression for "pu broda". Ten= se in Lojban is aoristic; it happening in the past does not have any implic= ations concerning that that action could not have continued into the presen= t of future, or that another event which could be described in otherwise id= entical fashion cannot be happening (again) in the present or could not hap= pen (again) in the future. The restrictive nature of "poi'a" = encodes the possibility that other versions of what is otherwise the same b= ridi notion exist truthfully. (You got this correct, btw. I am just making = an observation, which I find interesting, for the record. It might even bec= ome handy for future discussions/lessons/introductions - or this one, if yo= u edit it (but I am not suggesting that you should do so)).

This mea= ns that we now have a symmetric and easy way to express exclusive (non-aori= stic) tenses. Before, we would have needed to include "po'o" = (example: ~"pu po'o broda") or to use negated AND connectives= (example: "pu jenai ca jenai ba broda") in order to express this= meaning. Now, we can just use "noi'a" (example: "broda = noi'a purci").

___

I do worry about the interaction = between "noi'a" with a temporal tense and other nontemporal t= enses. Since space and time are symmetric in Lojbanic treatment, saying tha= t it happened only in the past might mean that it did not happen at any spa= tial location (because the only tense applicable is the past, not any locat= ion tense). Likewise, "noi'a purci" (and nothing more) might = mean that the event occurred in the past and nothing else, which means that= it could not have occurred at any spatial location. Clearly, both of these= interpretations are nonsensical because 'events' which occur must = have done so both in some nonempty region of space and during some nonempty= interval of time. Now, in the "pu po'o" case, I think that t= his is a much more serious (although possibly circumventable) problem; but = in the "noi'a purci" case, it might be possible to make some = sort of argument against it due to the nature of selbri/brivla. But I am no= t sure. It still seems dangerous to me.

On Monday, October 17, 2016 = at 8:43:21 AM UTC-4, selpa'i wrote:
The cmavo of selma'o NOIhA are all the hype right now =E2=80= =94 everyone's=20
talking about them.

I wish.

Somehow most people have never even heard of NOIhA. A good while ago, i= n=20
March 2016 to be exact, I wrote what was to this day the only written= =20
documentation of NOIhA out there. But... it's in Lojban:

http://selpahi.weebly.com/lojban/zo-xoi-= joi-lo-se-srana-be-ri

I think very few people have read that article. Shocking, I know!

Well, anyway.

Since I consider NOIhA absolutely necessary, the best way to raise=20
awareness is to write about it in English. That is the purpose of the= =20
present article.

https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_4673_2051729844.1483430060145-- ------=_Part_4672_1727884767.1483430060145--