Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jake@mail.jerrington.me designates 52.25.106.113 as permitted sender) client-ip=52.25.106.113;
Subject: Re: [lojban] translation of Ferdinand the Bull
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <3a6f9942-3c94-4da0-b2d4-84dd7047e6a1@googlegroups.com>
 <588932E0.6000007@gmail.com>
 <92fcb116-6e38-489d-82e6-1687f5bd63bc@googlegroups.com>
From: Jacob Thomas Errington <jake@mail.jerrington.me>
Message-ID: <5160f7d3-af01-8560-bf4e-8cdef5ba8815@mail.jerrington.me>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:17:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <92fcb116-6e38-489d-82e6-1687f5bd63bc@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

coi la bremenli

On 02/03/2017 03:55 PM, vpbroman@gmail.com wrote:
> In the suggestion "lo cmalu je nakni bakni poi ki foho vi xabju kuho"
> (and another place)
> what is the intention behind adding "ki"?
> Since I don't have any sticky tenses already set, there are none to cancel.
> Is the "ki" just there for hygiene, just to clear the stage, so to speak?
>

This usage is not {ki} as described in the CLL, but rather from the 
cekitaujau (CKJT) dialect[1].

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

[1] https://mw.lojban.org/papri/ce_ki_tau_jau

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.