Received: from mail-it0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:34470) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1dOta1-0000of-7o for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:31:02 -0700 Received: by mail-it0-f61.google.com with SMTP id 185sf1044214itv.1 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:31:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1498343455; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ui5Lj5p6ixjWw1rdqqdBZ1ob3FkieTnupL41/pp3yUWeY9VBCaMOJ6EO4WzvHawjHZ pgfDEnUIj6EYySGhJ7gOB4nA/CpinePDLddXdsPNVaTeVaOrFWEj5uFqdk9JA3eyqmPq qPISCo0E82iXp7nn1HM1BR7J6ra5+Yw6GhTHz7x1HIrQJtYjM6T+dm3tZN1u8ssJdU1Y Uel9bzRoyFS6SCyn33UY7EXqCWrFSi3Gu9BZZ3e7SiFSblc/QWpgr+uY9hFs07TReB8H vj+gFwXgXFqMBv2/ALp1ApCOvvzO55F8rGkOchy9Vg4hy0VEsj+2OojJ7pibDHZB2EIC Gzbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:arc-authentication-results :arc-message-signature:sender:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=SrWLO3m5Y9lAXlRit/HJI0R2aQCR7WTw/1vSuv0oWt4=; b=vsY2U6ZclvBY0WjGeYXIdyyjVOPJ79ZNsaDdZHmFvy7PSxcKTyQMw5PR6THEghJ/1d txXh6M2SJ3dxMoyEjtdDGXDZjhNoBNLl53obKJjigR20TT3gopihVAsDrKRO8Dza9Q3T MgDOwd451CJzhI2yPkFYTLV4lhyOroUsXVy+zuDoj5bLLBzJo2LqGSH0l/uec/WgyEcI bCN+wUxfLo/Yji0xZPNfMoY6Xm2XKgAK9wJ2Lgpb1kqNyBF2LwkW9aN1fbckNyb1j6Up FZNskRBrAkEDICPuE+kZzpM/RyeXb64OetfDybN1Y+6I34P8J8UUpfq6YR/2J+gbEHue OqcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FCt7PlG3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SrWLO3m5Y9lAXlRit/HJI0R2aQCR7WTw/1vSuv0oWt4=; b=n+XJQQwpyVt8Ih6iE5CunsRer8e1ssmG+ePs2wENHv2waW8HTCa0QpuPnT4l2fokf+ VO/lXhLJ0uyJj/jlt8OmCSHpXWWS8kLknWiC1tn3UxtBfJ2lsD9Y1epXpFDCJkzSecpY xpSnGpeHwTEYwvNhQT/kfUcS19q5N1dhNxBw8IGRXCH/d8Ouw+RRX1oAqaL2Rkx8aBMP CryHIaUOudiCfOOzmms+1zy46+f74mVADnu0ggprEkp/e7AvUIjWU2R33eYNuva+Yb3K EWF7KaDfFxJloVTLPquwlsAh//7b+bm6NnrjIyzb7wsMNcFDLZ+3z4PfArch1m8x/7Se FnzA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SrWLO3m5Y9lAXlRit/HJI0R2aQCR7WTw/1vSuv0oWt4=; b=AB8ngSwQMFENTGttiyOSMkgl+tYXgD+6E/fBlN19ezs2LkD1TInshqQdJkGKWUKVEf vMygbTQPhMiISX8+lRwjK67gnrbj9BX4dED0sg0l2w6sLQCrioa6ANbxQUJ/73je9/s7 AF1MmJryY+v1JyZizsFIM0L2XKmV4j5QtuZ6IAKh7X2ALW0IqmbwiovtSBaTiXk8wHgw /pcq36HLO5B97uyUpnuvDllQKiejnLOir/FC6Iu3/iYTkU+JCuF9qj38viustylZ2BcS 1jro8vjSQ2hs8pA3VLbRgvuSBJ1b687mW36gqkjyQf/Vg5Dzo6KSRgf7Z7n7Ob56SIGh 1/pQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=SrWLO3m5Y9lAXlRit/HJI0R2aQCR7WTw/1vSuv0oWt4=; b=f/6Pnm0/DVbqELPaSTKY6iLuEhyFybFjlv7Si14UmJTguelmj03YVvDhnGkijTIzZa lJgSGjTpD88zwTw1yOgnNS+DrgWdM82GL/g0CK253OHu59e+5k08oXzyz6su2xrlgvcX 4lyxyvgplLmBjF8p0e2Z9OVuzwcYOTCF8IEazR71G1Wv5Wvfjr65tqlmEhB69z0/jdM4 IBSJ7/vr9CbDhVO5IPLT+9vUY985oPlFO/Ftz2PpLoBWfGcQuEzB1XMcpVBGzMD3g9mv 5Yva7PIJXJb2Fctju3WrBR+quLyBRY4YzGq2OM2MXDoIRMpDfWeqXFsUAqG3ck2oO/6j BrdQ== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwcO5gad/yiROenpSQKPmZH9flYmO7qFez7VIwIPDtS0qNTBVgl Mce9vOVfFFMNkg== X-Received: by 10.157.46.132 with SMTP id w4mr353783ota.18.1498343455574; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.19.24 with SMTP id f24ls9003210ote.9.gmail; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.158.200 with SMTP id h191mr5691805vke.40.1498343455239; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1498343455; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RedwWZqteorkmLx330oJFZT14VTxYHFEXIQ8ve0Fg0D+CdgHAATYXzJnx0gsYZCZ8N eLMro44D8pDeYOix4ASEnadLSbhcnX3YMV6bKbrwENLFw16Um867h42Ey8bDCrXa5SpO 8afIyCX6nbwF3nzz5CEc2IkCGtrHnxRlw4WTalK3HF/MFaffcuPpXhIL+zQKp/y+sxU8 Lw3AW2C3JQt5N6+UOHzUDfVcnKoefJtRQOzKLDdLxzqcJ7R7fcdkFheqqHYwtDV/ZQiv 4XY/wefETjnqMxfi/jenP381/BVYNLnAdqSO2gYvox8z9IG5Wj3yXoYjKRbkC6WQdrVY 4WPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=bzlrBh8gQw6cvjcQWZfOqtJFmBbANGujcTrQtfSEG5Q=; b=WIRyNkm3EgS9r3oaAPFcsuRbek65GQoJT38CTnd88GPD1o6yNZ24y+JLSsdVdY5LMh SQ+mLyJIaDqakdrTceRzH0ssHFb8mF9CfAGAFnt1wWmM2L03HUpuWJVYlqRwl3P5fhI6 WbUAY1fBwV9vGxax9Q0KJiQDV6YDjK6Lc7kmjeDMwGAYdKsqdXsvTieKDpAZDPI+GJmx 5Z8vOHhY48YDAXAIkQO4n8Wfq8bqAaqz+XsdYzrXJHV7XLb/JeTKDypI3Gr7chSOjLUH n08HQosI8DQdvuXWLZ/r3ekYgrO7d/gBJU0Kgj6F00FnGzWJbwdEbAAJpvLe9LrbAMtz x0jA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FCt7PlG3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e62si3320753pfm.6.2017.06.24.15.30.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d; Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e187so34182719pgc.1 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.99.49.20 with SMTP id x20mr14564317pgx.181.1498343454829; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.163.131 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: MorphemeAddict Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 17:30:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] lujvo with non-existing rafsi To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1160106072410552bc45ec" X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FCt7PlG3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- --94eb2c1160106072410552bc45ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" My first thought on seeing a non-allocated rafsi is that it's a typo for something else. Have you considered that possibility? stevo On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Remo Dentato wrote: > After a couple of years I exported the jbovlaste content and downloaded in > a spreadsheet which, for me, are much easier to use as a vocabulary. > > Among the new (for me) words there is: dignocklaji ( > http://vlasisku.alexburka.com/dignocklaji) > > Personally I would have used a cmevla or a fu'ivla for "Diagonalley" but > that's not a problem. > > The doubt I have is to use the unallocated rafsi {noc} to create a word is > it permitted? > > I thought that the idea behind lujvo was to be able to guess the meaning > of the word by looking at the gismu the rafsi were assigned to. > > Is this no longer the case? (or maybe it was never the case and using > not-assigned rafsi was always allowed). > > mu'e mi'e la remod. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --94eb2c1160106072410552bc45ec Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My first thought on seeing a non-allocated rafsi is that it&= #39;s a typo for something else. Have you considered that possibility?=C2= =A0

stevo

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Remo Dentato <rdenta= to@gmail.com> wrote:
After a couple of years I exported the = jbovlaste content and downloaded in a spreadsheet which, for me, are much e= asier to use as a vocabulary.

Among the new (for me) words the= re is: dignocklaji (http://vlasisku.alexburka.com/dignocklaji)
Personally I would have used a cmevla or a fu'ivla for "Dia= gonalley" but that's not a problem.

The doubt I have = is to use the unallocated rafsi {noc} to create a word is it permitted?
I thought that the idea behind lujvo was to be able to guess the= meaning of the word by looking at the gismu the rafsi were assigned to.
Is this no longer the case? (or maybe it was never the case and using = not-assigned rafsi was always allowed).

mu'e mi'e la r= emod.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--94eb2c1160106072410552bc45ec--