Received: from mail-qt0-f185.google.com ([209.85.216.185]:34792) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1dacPl-0002W4-Ot for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:59 -0700 Received: by mail-qt0-f185.google.com with SMTP id l22sf6173658qtf.1 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=UtTlo+LOfgNBjUUYBKeX+Dj3urr2jD8tt3N5q7IsaF0=; b=JGNm/5jTr/6tBtQoX2KtHvfBD0u0pgG4d5vj+yNZfcI0/c0SkWOAZui2qVL4DVxbzG 2TcHSdqGvBnrh4I9cszW/bx9+IHmYCjjMQyMdsAdGdOteWfGOGzTQ96KbC4NpIKQY0vp t7H/ddcrlfgaIdrpJZik0iJD082sxoydsI6NJO6tMuWFrYEavvetyREcEd2WIBdtEYnF T7Bxmz3WDDLtXk/wsxv7XwcPfFT4o+fer/r6vCnBELyKSBdobnb6jHVa/ro+ZNWt8/eu APB5oRuzAQQaMD5eV/2+yGcForarF5tRYdT5sOfzdu28Lb2KGBvM3cgpNoXGF8/C3LrK giEg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=UtTlo+LOfgNBjUUYBKeX+Dj3urr2jD8tt3N5q7IsaF0=; b=to0gmqYwQgALsZVdqibOkiY/znA0TmnC2Gv9gt7pOhGCA/WVwrkJ5Rd9Jc2GT/TmcJ x15XRRg1EuEzuaL8qNA1CA1nPQM+9pr46Yug0xN7AXt8NCfMI3w24lyoemsJOe5DKzFi QB8UinbUXgMvMSxe/7ygHi74ei8MtVYPKSwLtxN2hREUrGexRm7m1l+Vr91O1DYFMZIQ ClmsfEb4HARcYiHmmEW5qqt5M93HKTcbyL+R8zYmpdAwa9qSi1XzO/Jc/SIZNdAAHvdD +TXLE4yXp1a4tSrAXTRZu1HR2jDil2QN7b1i/9n7ED3qyCTIBXH5cks8fT/WtO4V50im 5ocg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=UtTlo+LOfgNBjUUYBKeX+Dj3urr2jD8tt3N5q7IsaF0=; b=op9yzV4fMHNBkkV9VnDum3wMy3SE5SH4QUvznfht6Id0ggc3q/tEoDf/4MMeog+Ny2 j0L0/Sl8QzMx1Qx3COB/oDqEs2J9X3t3rxS8ST2t0A3vcnvOZYgBRx7Hf/lRhCYLyXYO zMmYearXdaXMwn6f0JCzysjuvq5NtrKGkJpx/hLTgXb6D3Yday7ccKr4igL1W/f+DHjp OusvOBD1yiJT0ecJIyP1yovHiJjcIx8bdrqMwcjR0Zgp3jC8biFDb5xelCxRWyP/M7sH upaPfcmxHftmQFXxBgzG2Qlz5QEQr/IAuCSkeFU2nhvSRFazqk8a7ZahdbtQNGuWeIQg 811Q== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1115OgRriq1QkKtu9G/G6ynMKVAOnQRxh6NkSSFuXM9R9j6oZw+Y fIKw2MEHTjQRdA== X-Received: by 10.36.26.134 with SMTP id 128mr120503iti.3.1501137403847; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.36.120.20 with SMTP id p20ls1713308itc.6.gmail; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.31.167.5 with SMTP id q5mr17291vke.12.1501137403503; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:36:43 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com To: lojban Message-Id: <7aef998f-2082-488d-92a2-ccf370d4dd14@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: peg grammars MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_535_353697994.1501137403223" X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_535_353697994.1501137403223 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_536_233615742.1501137403223" ------=_Part_536_233615742.1501137403223 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Em quinta-feira, 27 de julho de 2017 01:05:16 UTC+3, Vincent Broman escreveu: > > Is there consensus about which PEG grammar best represents current > standard lojban (CLL1+BPFK)? > Where do I find it? > > Must be https://github.com/lojban/ilmentufa/blob/master/camxes.peg Although note that it some ways it's significant deviation from CLL not approved by BPFK. E.g. handling indicators, allowing infinite loops, inability to handle left recursion. On the other hand this grammar includes handling morphology and magical words probably approved by BPFK, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_536_233615742.1501137403223 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Em quinta-feira, 27 de julho de 2017 01:05:16 UTC+= 3, Vincent Broman escreveu:
Is there consensus about which PEG grammar best represents c= urrent standard lojban (CLL1+BPFK)?
Where do I find it?


Must be https://github.com/lojban/ilmentufa/b= lob/master/camxes.peg

Although note that it some w= ays it's significant deviation from CLL not approved by BPFK. E.g. hand= ling indicators, allowing infinite loops, inability to handle left recursio= n. On the other hand this grammar includes handling morphology and magical = words probably approved by BPFK,
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_536_233615742.1501137403223-- ------=_Part_535_353697994.1501137403223--