Received: from mail-io0-f183.google.com ([209.85.223.183]:35524) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1dfB0e-0004Xh-QL for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:50 -0700 Received: by mail-io0-f183.google.com with SMTP id c74sf2516732iod.2 for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1502223702; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qU/G3YhpmHIKyg9xxhtoPmgaGtDdJdjVU78PBOPBCVuLuJQYI3scjXlhFBtejkKBub oTSMiIvXl0PSDeuP+e7JcsyVdvsK+rCCMRyufay/ZGFKqn8mwEGS8HlE8ABRy0MRZNEa vhgUdUn1btGbQjqXnXUY2pVpgvIH/Zq5v8adjOBS/FSglxtRjaJTTgEtWIMBWsh4V5iC WLEyZYCjFDq8ze543R8pYtHbPPqCFJ5H4Y7s9FPWyCFEwtQ/zzHZanD9a6p/ZxCINgp7 4aT2kotSYjCSGJikTkEmciBPpK4CwZtkmCS5E8vG9XFfMjxigng0jsEQJeVwm2iLaWXv 96vw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:arc-authentication-results :arc-message-signature:sender:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=+02DkAr6rE/b+70gzYyYJNAp2qlnJNi3goxmE+BxLT0=; b=BmRHg/Z8loqVg1bS+nXuvdcFCwz6KKxedc4hmsaVR3lOSPk6mXWxa+n771cafBBwI5 LwkyfSZOjR6XetBbFkXNPcwkqpDKxy0qz2orFJL2hQh+hW9GijhhNVhY46DnVtY3Rv8u c4XY3gShT3OF7BSA3DTlO4RHRPiLKEUvFS+BqOHPTRlUy4N3EGfWRucrqo3bx8c1AwLs GxCJEfdONd4twuoSFvpsWjwF11ZxXnMc9MznpHkfMFMZkWymEcLf8odZDxTy6u7Ivw/z x+mezFhvtYoXDCRN+pdTVXvyFVRmSwyQ3tOygLdV+6jJuRGXwdVeLBh0ppiebw2wPPcV tz5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ry1jmwhN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+02DkAr6rE/b+70gzYyYJNAp2qlnJNi3goxmE+BxLT0=; b=KaQ8LRklzE5gZS9QpCCAJ54HKZuKc3jPgDPyhSnvAUJXVhnfZsa0Xq+E0MMWVHr5gd TWXsllkKDK4ihJRotIPa+yx9fs7xKa0gijHA063jWcsJjcpfr1TWQpqQK/+UZ1g4Fvfy 3KUWOMRQTolRfgkRweOmCSetk1PVxyDUu2a6KQZ0Tbxoy5lWT7w6GAZTyCQognrSuhdb KUtJTpR3bfOhTW6nSsjyqp+cHAED8Y89tknW3SMeNS/zgc/eQmVB69MReYXXyVb9IQWD Q/hyXTGG2iwPZxqxAHOXwd42VKZPtWtlWV5wq1gkLvEe1ZcnTFnTDIt3DoNL/ksduTD8 KdBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+02DkAr6rE/b+70gzYyYJNAp2qlnJNi3goxmE+BxLT0=; b=X0C0ZzAWQmmf2kGrBSUwnvlQd+sDgUS83KwODQHo6U2pSpfQ6AEKoiSFIg9hvY6xu+ n48ikSZnTWhXgqoAXiQUJE89QyAwn6XdKRvNQs9wo4ha3tIF+qMfHixW4iPUdEQJGiuY RYuAWlEum/veIvxKHXaUrT+S6njVAPxfId90dg7ouLXBGo6bTLv/o/rer/YdMcYsK59C 400bZCZYyq/XLBy3VoPr2Ji6fcC+HvGoW0kGU3Xje3yDqT4bbJvoYW7fM7YcFeEx8Sbw p2sfdLzT4FMYBhVQIBhjmi/2o17KZgErxqeTD/u8mfOO2AhCU6qYIH1cDgFXcrauhQXf wfFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=+02DkAr6rE/b+70gzYyYJNAp2qlnJNi3goxmE+BxLT0=; b=TDi4cNAVDJvwNcQddXsOF7T3te8LZmB2NtURDwNWYF3O+RyUhLnxOinWZdc60DWidm QfMdSCl5GwyQFTOHKM+AxRCEyX1v3JsXZTbCKOmNnltfMFlB1IhsE9cZj9/H53S+bFIs XyKKaOQZaDYeU5QuamBoA+y07arfFAmJmkOa1O4/1TqAVmWzeGnytUBNGGIyDGOCy7ve 5yMwyGie0bNFLLXT1cvuNUd+PBU4JJYisSTSdVgSA0KYeuFLY2LqWctATSYyjeNtFEXE Xc5X7xYZS0YaFJ2GN2we7TpkOJhiIz6nsWxkR7RAKDZTs0OOxBunjeeZwcS6ITlFl69Y uo7g== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111ASv4DHZ7ZN2lCzcAMHBCR4jYdkGOUnc0hciqj0GSk8NuD2R+M 3xWdSswrRXzARQ== X-Received: by 10.36.82.208 with SMTP id d199mr239202itb.7.1502223702179; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.128.165 with SMTP id k37ls3498867ioi.37.gmail; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.99.103.193 with SMTP id b184mr3430197pgc.109.1502223701740; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1502223701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xmHxpjOf9tyLy3skW+6udgBnAb2txqn6yRiU2TwQLrAltbNlgUFfwj7lS7J6v0jgLx yy4PKhnOtYqZ1YCs0f0yuVCt71s2NDPwHs05JnBqtpR46ct3g2R6W42S279k8RR8hv2V UmE2erDl/JUeLbpv/kmMtFiIfFuun6kp3y1mUNvQU2WbHIhuaPTgYzL8YOM3wSj8anfe PUH2xSIu+QeGEfrJyaxCL32VqdhGJ/1VnxyXmpSmb6mNgWkvlCkBoAZXE3JPbomWePQ/ ru45gLSJhpYz9Mq3SJy9xeeqSmojVHbkcA5T+lpP0Hno3kqdW8+ka/0yL4zhSDuN7jPL /UPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=PIj9P0B+buppfDoGRTAOH9oLl69QwNqY2rA35lYTsVE=; b=uVB+/CZ4C9O035UnWLF7MgPzrWCv8uGb5DCF9JQlumjLJ1qe8UzUXvia/2MGvEBjPf tGBsteK+0+uljAWsyuLiKmIQYZoihGLa4SFxc6z8/89yoFF5srRfk7xOQ7ppVwTDq2S1 ZhGRGKCDnItIO7+xb5SeCM4FXzsK5Wc9JvuEmWV7Dpr3qyK3/pEOzJw6UG1l6ckPLhSH uugqA/xj2loFKWfzzH2xIg94feiOZcxUzGiOAD59e2Clawqa28pKCBEU25F/uhrHAMcV avEMLcmOpKUsU+r10ReDg7qcxCIsHPrd0yuWNW9aRY1v9cY3WHLZ4VFPvU9I4K8OPGUH GEPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ry1jmwhN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com. [2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z83si349097pfd.17.2017.08.08.13.21.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233; Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c28so18781999pfe.3 for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.98.152.155 with SMTP id d27mr5623272pfk.245.1502223701145; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.183.108 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:21:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55dadbe1-2951-4e54-957c-4e403076cf44@googlegroups.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:21:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] rewrite rules To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04fcf2147c30055643b62a" X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ry1jmwhN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lytlesw@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) X-Spam_score: -4.6 X-Spam_score_int: -45 X-Spam_bar: ---- --94eb2c04fcf2147c30055643b62a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That gitorious site timed out for me. Is this one the same? https://hackage.haskell.org/package/tersmu stevo Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Ilmen wrote: > Good project. I suggest you put those in a public Google spreadsheet, so > people can add alternative definitions (or suggestions of improvements) i= n > additional columns. The expansions of JOI available on the BPFK pages are > absent from your list. > > Ultimately you can express all that Lojban can express with a very limite= d > set of cmavo, but by using only those, utterances get extremely verbose. > > For example, {ro mlatu cu mabru gi'e se tuple vo da} can be rephrased as: > > {roldza fa lo ka zilkanxe fa lo du'u ce'u goi ko'a mabru ku lo du'u li vo > kaidza lo ka ce'u tuple ko'a} > > which can be further impoverished in cmavo diversity by removing those FA > and expanding counting quantification (vo da / li vo kaidza=E2=80=A6) usi= ng only > existential quantification, but that'll make thing even much more verbose= . > > Do you know of the Tersmu project ( https://gitorious.org/tersmu/tersmu/ > ), whose purpose is to translate between Lojban and a logic notation? It'= s > not a complete project (many cmavo aren't yet handled properly) but it's > already pretty good. If you have access to the Lojban rooms on IRC, > Telegram, Slack or Discord, you can a Tersmu interface available there to > test it without installing anything. > > =E2=80=94Ilmen. > > On 08/08/2017 16:33, vpbroman@gmail.com wrote: > > Because of my minimalist preferences, I'm interested in seeing how small = a > subset of lojban would be capable of expressing the same things as the fu= ll > language. > If a hard word can be completely replaced by a rephrasing with easy words= , > then that word is useful for conciseness, but is otherwise dispensible. > If you had rewrite rules to macro expand words in terms of other words, > and if you ordered words from complex to simple and required that the wor= ds > in the rewrite be simpler than the word being rewritten (to avoid > self-referential loops) then you don't infinitely regress, you eventually > expand everything to its simplest possible terms. > > This is like the concept of Semantic Primes, which alludes to the prime > factorization of numbers. > As an inspiring example, Schemers point to how all computations can be > expressed in terms of: lambda, recursion, if, quote, cons, car, cdr, and > maybe a thing or two more -- I forget. > > So, content words in lojban get defined in a dictionary in terms of other > words. > But I'm interested in how our function words are defined in terms of othe= r > words. > Lots of examples are in CLL and the BPFK docs, such as this from xorlo. > > lo broda ku =3D zohe noi keha broda kuho > > I've collected all the rewrites that I could find (plus a handful I made > up) and listed them in this rough draft document. > cmavo_equiv.txt > https://app.box.com/s/hjis4vnshj8tvnu2q2vg7hkcfh65fcyc > > Suggesting additions/corrections would be appreciated. > > Many are inexact equivalents, for example BAI is defined in terms of fiho= , > even though BAI fits syntactically in a number of places where a fiho > phrase is not allowed. > Most of UI can be roughly equivalent to a sei-sehu phrase, at least when > the UI appears at the start of the sentence, but sei-sehu doesn't seem to > comment on anything more localized than the entire bridi. E.g. > > ui =3D sei mi lo nu nei ca gleki sehu > > Except ui can attach to individual words and indicate pleasure in them > more specifically, not just in the whole statement. > My rewrites for UI->sei are very rough and incomplete, but they are paire= d > with lojban definitions from jbovlaste. > > The prosumti and probridi seem harder to rewrite. I wonder whether the > following would make sense. > > mi =3D lo cusku be luhe nei > do =3D lo te cusku be luhe nei > > mihe bremenli > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --94eb2c04fcf2147c30055643b62a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That gitorious site timed out for me. Is this one the same?=C2=A0<= /font>
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/tersmu<= /font>

stevo

3D"" Virus-free. www.avast.com

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Ilmen <ilmen.pokebip@gmail.com= > wrote:
=20 =20 =20

Good project. I suggest you put those in a public Google spreadsheet, so people can add alternative definitions (or suggestions of improvements) in additional columns. The expansions of JOI available on the BPFK pages are absent from your list.

Ultimately you can express all that Lojban can express with a very limited set of cmavo, but by using only those, utterances get extremely verbose.

For example, {ro mlatu cu mabru gi'e se tuple vo da} can be rephrased as:

{roldza fa lo ka zilkanxe fa lo du'u ce'u goi ko'a mabru= ku lo du'u li vo kaidza lo ka ce'u tuple ko'a}

which can be further impoverished in cmavo diversity by removing those FA and expanding counting quantification (vo da / li vo kaidza=E2=80=A6) using only existential quantification, but that'= ll make thing even much more verbose.

Do you know of the Tersmu project ( https://gitorious.org/tersmu/tersmu= / ), whose purpose is to translate between Lojban and a logic notation? It's not a complete project (many cmavo aren't yet handled properly) but it's already pretty good. If you have acces= s to the Lojban rooms on IRC, Telegram, Slack or Discord, you can a Tersmu interface available there to test it without installing anything.

=E2=80=94Ilmen.


On 08/08/2017 16:3= 3, vpbroman@gmail.com wrote:
Because of my minimalist preferences, I'm interested in seeing how small a subset of lojban would be capable of expressing the same things as the full language.
If a hard word can be completely replaced by a rephrasing with easy words, then that word is useful for conciseness, but is otherwise dispensible.
If you had rewrite rules to macro expand words in terms of other words, and if you ordered words from complex to simple and required that the words in the rewrite be simpler than the word being rewritten (to avoid self-referential loops) then you don'= t infinitely regress, you eventually expand everything to its simplest possible terms.

This is like the concept of Semantic Primes, which alludes to the prime factorization of numbers.
As an inspiring example, Schemers point to how all computations can be expressed in terms of: lambda, recursion, if, quote, cons, car, cdr, and maybe a thing or two more -- I forget.

So, content words in lojban get defined in a dictionary in terms of other words.
But I'm interested in how our function words are defined in terms of other words.
Lots of examples are in CLL and the BPFK docs, such as this from xorlo.

lo broda ku =3D zohe noi keha broda kuho

I've collected all the rewrites that I could find (plus a handful I made up) and listed them in this rough draft document. cmavo_equiv.txt
htt= ps://app.box.com/s/hjis4vnshj8tvnu2q2vg7hkcfh65fcyc

Suggesting additions/corrections would be appreciated.

Many are inexact equivalents, for example BAI is defined in terms of fiho, even though BAI fits syntactically in a number of places where a fiho phrase is not allowed.
Most of UI can be roughly equivalent to a sei-sehu phrase, at least when the UI appears at the start of the sentence, but sei-sehu doesn't seem to comment on anything more localized tha= n the entire bridi. E.g.

ui =3D sei mi lo nu nei ca gleki sehu

Except ui can attach to individual words and indicate pleasure in them more specifically, not just in the whole statement.
My rewrites for UI->sei are very rough and incomplete, but they are paired with lojban definitions from jbovlaste.

The prosumti and probridi seem harder to rewrite. I wonder whether the following would make sense.

mi =3D lo cusku be luhe nei
do =3D lo te cusku be luhe nei

mihe bremenli

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--94eb2c04fcf2147c30055643b62a--