Received: from mail-io0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:43598) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eBle7-0003ED-8f for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:21 -0800 Received: by mail-io0-f189.google.com with SMTP id f20sf22674417ioj.2 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509991029; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NqJqk1kx850472SRVMq8ZF/7951bBM8QrXAN7DE7enh0P+H3lqiBgiy+HyuaHgQRkp crPi1ZAHuSJYHoUFbdmpqrcqe6PKICD2+jBAsxksdVSez6xHuEYeJUWCTjm4VpdzVfJr B2TLMOzC+z/FpLAq+bkzP1Ov8NFUHNpI5WQgy5bn6eSi0RplOlfPeScdbVLr+o2bj5HA ICr0vN1DcxTLia7Nxbs6P4/P2nhnXdzQOFnDiPLSjje9khgBPrUE1VaHVmxMmnFnFymO uYlZyNSaHjB+2f01iaM/JHsJwRjTKvshnExRkFgDIZ9PSX8HYxTiopAbC+aSfDwcLEaJ 0tiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:mime-version:subject :references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results:arc-message-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=0jkzbi2ebRJGMJCTFpmwUd2LQ/M5LCovN/OyaxCc1/0=; b=kRrDsFj0spuxYQwlhXH659y28Sn+1UUUuctBxUTsJY3FDR23YvYihWvCiVvlQ1OoFR G7N3GdQ3ryF0FPepB1inCHEJ3itruZQb924FUD2zEGVi7gSqg1FBvLqPHC3XA4y0Kj1j KmxTvutfVpwMK1KZU5xRcYjMGYhXcnRH8w+UZKc5vJhmY++kLH4nTR+DIW4k3ub6BA9g eXBgR2JyfZ4EXBE+euMhCq21FDYWk01hsexwLSLToGFCgtFGOrpGopbU7lXhoqN4ZATs jr5teFJLWU70QDw71cVuwpmFLd/7d/2BblaXhNN9HQw7XFOU0KyOjU4hYUFEycvrbPNh 5QUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=OwuOYKyo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 74.6.130.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=0jkzbi2ebRJGMJCTFpmwUd2LQ/M5LCovN/OyaxCc1/0=; b=Dud3rFXCrDXTwv9H9qyXniKMZ52Eip9kuUV7J9+/JOA6LsWg8EV/dz21jAqrSe1dcq /akVMFGZbLJvbgCz4zcwvKaAtttCjA0UfTuJdDCw1fShg652CF0nllSFDUgaLkLBXQlm DZ7OCBUScvAJQmEwEXHSkUWoOMGaaYa6NkCVc0013RF2aifhFk9ROGyrylkK8L87YZFN O8NbO44Nbx2isW3NTDRU+JtWTPPJtEaHeUTS9PgW9qREuLzOaLath1qr7vxXpjJo4WzF 6QyQo3RxoChb9x280iiEpQiGOIAXm4vzvLlUhTmCaoFlQN7x9zG1VKQT6dl3xZGMUglh bp8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=0jkzbi2ebRJGMJCTFpmwUd2LQ/M5LCovN/OyaxCc1/0=; b=f5I+lulf+WYy0Yo1BcwbfhB8/1TxJD5A9NmqOgxmH9BvtNmJWxg73ykAp1ZNtwpx+A i5c60q07IU+KevC95uN0vIVqXjJCmONk2L+iAZI2i/DYWRVifFokr2lGxy3dKVgdfr3t Tt1Hj8EXlBuUnauwZShQ28GdNz6wtD4AxoWnTF0JYopEV9RgYvL2nqsn92w3GjQ0zIhC ZMe+A6QAFgwlmYh9pQWwC4iawCXGrr4WQ/lvoWBkryRp6Hi2KbFCQmEENt++MfBdybyO zkjYS4LKfDGkmtIH4W6H+jz7RB0pJVArr7pO4F34u4I+yv+7RnoDC7RAITGA4x70ukGv yB8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5/GnZvJIZqpLRbFGRkrEe7GuxjI+P5tpOxqHXous4CarkIM0W3 bKeCDinPGTbm8hC11CE7JW4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RLO9e9UP6KAmYFgNTGSaqZcmQAVdFGjUZbIaLlZlQjp1EHnuEZXPIcHArFz6VtaXHzpnMJcA== X-Received: by 10.36.224.196 with SMTP id c187mr154299ith.0.1509991028788; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.36.51.205 with SMTP id k196ls2538378itk.1.gmail; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.36.91.193 with SMTP id g184mr7578136itb.54.1509991028289; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509991028; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hHba91v6frrsyi83xtIOuseRDoxAZHEWobfaKFZ+BLMtmNANba5VXIidq+Y8BP1fdK y0pmMd20wzfuvCRxUcS/1AKjNRvPYjlh+gVljcnYxjD2npimRfjA0q5350eRRh8bJPKD 6fwOpqQf7LaNIS90sfifO5NtPq1okmtldURehB6cPrzeAInDBnJMzmpkGaToWnQX/ruJ KFrb/5dnFZlLnYLJRjEozMxNkZdVC8/iAdwe30MtbUzKo6dx97t0brz1xeAK3fNOXVTX JMP4e37z0/Os13l55AWzd6x45bROKocnN+IeD2yeLnVh4Di69ZvpYC3oX5BLoHtF6eQ2 Ak9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:to:from:date :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=mIUBhRYEE21qplggTjYvkoszTtUeuNe2uCvJlqkOAPc=; b=wyBWrA2WeMoqnyXLbK4vj+T9Q2ftlgNTIKYe24nw+yNmuoelRA0sozO9G9aniIude2 7UOhYr8zHfokKsjC5rwimOyhBWMAK9vmZdgQB95HZLb0C1NypshSohogeqgSUjg+vfUq 5cDBp0vYPkUP0O+tEoVkzmr6U/caBc8kOPhRyLgsZMsBhxo+aRxG/ohQATqXQER7fuaK T48oQL0QuWR5FAvjZ/ExXBMD9Z8hqgCTam10HxIqF1E3KdqueUkMFMLReOS0+S5C/zzt +5Ey+orz5gPi9KdHOXtNksKwD61jiSFexVw0uennGePtbljb9xHkCorBGYOdtdvVLNMR RRIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=OwuOYKyo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 74.6.130.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com Received: from sonic316-13.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic316-13.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com. [74.6.130.123]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c29si918188iod.3.2017.11.06.09.57.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 74.6.130.123 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.6.130.123; X-YMail-OSG: 4DAka5gVM1nK2i8h7_DRi.z_0d0abUSgS_btsEdNnI9ZMe7OsaP1QsYSmKDi3Ph aq4GhwPKqGHIlDbQ1.FS0W1FjqEJQV.Deb0QLwC51izxRNdd5ssIYn3ijhafR358AzlBlJenVaGZ Wif27p7Xd5rrBBt6PZTt2cTBCog3tCUUh59KNkSlPyXpkEnvVlOnZ2e8_Bt_8pa550E81UZq2t0D XLrSG06x4hCM6vAIHiynlVeA7FoC1ekXljv9FdCjZkMbMA_mf4JyVPVkl_2fQI_fNxeKDuLmmSr2 M_Km5edLqJzEd6O0bxr9QPZcJrSYiXavcCjdmrOcvB.dGgr.LBUKKMVwHCOimb1YBujQfaC0ZAq_ .JQ9QhjRAWeIIwEYEu3F20QG2fH_sFKODCb2tK0Rfdj7eSBDnCG9AfpPooWM14hMABQZUMuknxTl SkUqcAy1IRrchw6lgANqLvhY7nuFxk3EfAmjSxsIGNi4vAB7drdp.Siz_1nO1Vq7zVv7ojm3.Duy vbkav5L8- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:57:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:57:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "'John E Clifford' via lojban" To: Message-ID: <1501536099.3897447.1509991022056@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <03cb7058-3183-4b01-96f6-6a58ea2286e4@googlegroups.com> <3a342986-92d1-47e1-a9fe-5f2acb7b3942@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3897446_1188034559.1509991022052" X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.10849 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/604.3.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/11.0.1 Safari/604.3.5 Content-Length: 14326 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=OwuOYKyo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 74.6.130.123 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=yahoo.com X-Original-From: John E Clifford Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_bar: -- ------=_Part_3897446_1188034559.1509991022052 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Lojban: the language where no one ever knows whether what he says is gram= matical, and,if it is, whether it means what he intended." is apparently ev= en more true now than it was nearly 30 years ago when it was first proposed= . Even monoparsing, basically the only reason for Lojban's existence, is mo= re in doubt now than it was even back in the early days of CLL (well, getti= ng the right parse, at least; getting a unique one is easy). All the Baroqu= e excrescences on the simple system JCB tossed away 60+ years ago seem to h= ave done the opposite of helping. =C2=A0And clearly learning Lojban has not= helped to make people more rational or logical or even sensible. pycyn=C2=A0 On Monday, November 6, 2017, 9:01:04 AM CST, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: =20 =20 =20 Em segunda-feira, 6 de novembro de 2017, escreveu: [side note: I'll answer {la guskant} when I will have read the answer and l= inks ;-)=C2=A0] Thank you for that historical answer, Gleki.Yes, I perfectly understand the= huge damage it can cause. Nevertheless, I also understand why this may arise: I never saw a set of ru= les accepted by 100% of people! =20 - Laws? There are plenty of debates. Countries have different ones. Peop= le disagree on many, but also often agree on core ones. =20 - Coding style rules? There are as many guidelines as coders! However, e= nforcing the whole developer team to use them makes teamwork more effective= . They're like a common language. =20 - Language rules? Phew! Everyone knows someone who has his/her "very own= " way to spell words, or organize sentences... =20 For the sake of Lojban's survival and spreading (and despite my very short = history on that language), I think all=C2=A0must agree on some unique versi= on,=C2=A0and accept the debate to make it evolve, and accept that not all p= roposals will fit in, and that reintegration of proposals may take months o= r years. As you can see this is unlikely to happen since people like to fork but... you have CLL. It contains all the rules needed and makes the language funct= ional. If you read it all and say "I want to speak something else " that's okay. F= or now there is no document like this book in the amount of information int= roduced for a speakable logical language. Lojban is not in someone's head. It's been put on paper.=C2=A0 Said otherwise, we must all "agree to disagree", may I say... By the way, your answer makes me think about software distributions. Do we = want our future GNU-Linux / Android / iOS / Windows / BSD / whatever contai= n a lot of "jbo_*" (imagine "jbo_FR", "jbo_EN", "jbo_CA"...), or just a uni= que "jbo" language?Unicity of Lojban is, IMHO, vital. I personally would ju= st drop learning Lojban if I had no hope of that. Thanks again. la .sykyndyr. Le lundi 6 novembre 2017 14:10:44 UTC+1, Gleki Arxokuna a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: This is a long standing issue. As shanoxilt once correctly noted Lojban was= hijacked by a clique of so called fluent speakers.They started forking nev= er completing any printed documentation of they were doing. Firs they chang= e the meaning of the particle {lo}, then tried to implement other changes i= ncluding even the formal grammar. When people try to speak to fluent speakers they are immediately faced with= these discprepancies between The Complete Lojban Language book and views o= f particular people. You can imagine all the negative consequences of this = situation. But in spite of deterioration of Lojban community and its inability to prod= uce any fruitful results still Lojban is pretty much how The Complete Lojba= n Language describes it.E.g. learning a revised meaning {lo} is no big deal= . --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ topic/lo= jban/e94H-wdh5gc/ unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+= unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_3897446_1188034559.1509991022052 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Lojban: the language where no one ever knows whether what= he says is grammatical, and,if it is, whether it means what he intended." = is apparently even more true now than it was nearly 30 years ago when it wa= s first proposed. Even monoparsing, basically the only reason for Lojban's = existence, is more in doubt now than it was even back in the early days of = CLL (well, getting the right parse, at least; getting a unique one is easy)= . All the Baroque excrescences on the simple system JCB tossed away 60+ yea= rs ago seem to have done the opposite of helping.  And clearly learnin= g Lojban has not helped to make people more rational or logical or even sen= sible.

pycyn
 

=20
=20
On Monday, November 6, 2017, 9:01:04 AM CST, Gleki = Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:



=
Em segunda-feira, 6 de novembro de 2017, <sukender1@gmail.com> escr= eveu:
[side note: I'll answer {la guskant} when I will have re= ad the answer and links ;-) ]

<= div>Thank you for that historical answer, Gleki.
Yes, I perfectly= understand the huge damage it can cause.

Nevertheless, I also understand why this may arise: I never s= aw a set of rules accepted by 100% of people!
  • Laws? = There are plenty of debates. Countries have different ones. People disagree= on many, but also often agree on core ones.
  • =
  • Coding style rules? There are as many guidelines as coders! However, en= forcing the whole developer team to use them makes teamwork more effective.= They're like a common language.
  • Language= rules? Phew! Everyone knows someone who has his/her "very own" way to spel= l words, or organize sentences...
Fo= r the sake of Lojban's survival and spreading (and despite my very short hi= story on that language), I think all must agree on some unique = version, and accept the debate to make it evolve, and ac= cept that not all proposals will fit in, and that reintegration of p= roposals may take months or years.

As you can see this is unlikely= to happen since people like to fork but...

you have CLL. It contains all the rules needed and makes the langu= age functional.

If you read it all = and say "I want to speak something else " that's okay. For now there is no = document like this book in the amount of information introduced for a speak= able logical language.

Lojban is no= t in someone's head. It's been put on paper.
 
Said otherw= ise, we must all "agree to disagree", may I say...

By the way, your answer makes me think about software distr= ibutions. Do we want our future GNU-Linux / Android / iOS / Windows / BSD /= whatever contain a lot of "jbo_*" (imagine "jbo_FR", "jbo_EN", "jbo_CA"...= ), or just a unique "jbo" language?
Unicity of Lojban is, IMHO, v= ital. I personally would just drop learning Lojban if I had no hope of that= .

Thanks again.
la .sykyndyr.




Le lundi 6 novembre 2017 14:10:44 UTC+1, Gleki Arxokuna a =C3=A9crit&n= bsp;:
This is a long standing issue. As shanoxilt once correctly noted Lojb= an was hijacked by a clique of so called fluent speakers.
They st= arted forking never completing any printed documentation of they were doing= . Firs they change the meaning of the particle {lo}, then tried to implemen= t other changes including even the formal grammar.

When people try to speak to fluent speakers they are immedi= ately faced with these discprepancies between The Complete Lojban Language = book and views of particular people. You can imagine all the negative conse= quences of this situation.

But in s= pite of deterioration of Lojban community and its inability to produce any = fruitful results still Lojban is pretty much how The Complete Lojban Langua= ge describes it.
E.g. learning a revised meaning {lo} is no big d= eal.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Goog= le Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ topic/lojban/e94H-wdh5gc/ unsub= scribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@ googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to loj= ban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/ gr= oup/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ = optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/gro= up/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/o= ptout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_3897446_1188034559.1509991022052--