Received: from mail-lf0-f58.google.com ([209.85.215.58]:64738) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eCB7Q-0007KU-8U for lojban-list-archive@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:14 -0800 Received: by mail-lf0-f58.google.com with SMTP id i125sf144171lfe.23 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510088945; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Aq3q4No938SkIybTceu6kNxjctZDoozvkGvaUD+cvleddDt4y6dXvzSJrzlULjBLL8 0MfU4dsV8AStHFIL0a31bSMDALDf4g7j0ByojIe1aImpEJyLyRVOKBI/Q5gvKtGqVbH9 JXqSrn95Qex/ANMtlkjKFcfuWPS7PRSQJBzKS+6yMvuFoZe0muRhKMcDJx2PAF3IBBNN eYkManS83b2rkLJ+5HebDmqJh5wq7+jTuI5JoR9fVMpen/RAVcIa9NQyMXp0PXGGJPdb 3EJdGt5QCtVMC0uaWdpytYv00PUTpYzUZWry/k4+xKPG5nVRkDlzpMrYEThENNdls9Ob zEbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-help:list-post :list-id:mailing-list:precedence:reply-to:to:subject:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:arc-authentication-results :arc-message-signature:sender:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=kcjVUAnQVZyDNS+Uh73qpeqZjZDhmLc3x1PgZwU/X7s=; b=tAWSdsbLRm4xGDYHGLC1ZpJtpqvNUje9eZa3ZeGgGMbFyz3y7sWxBvBXSexKppYIX9 4QlsWFDZ533vtT6uqmE218nVFldn9AkMUbvS+VESN/qIV+b+jVEfpAcI8+gmfWbhxFAL gsSPg6EWQt1olhd5/0Zl/Up/HvXrLVGtugcq4Tva4sGOAHuy5KtFB25XTsbmjf8z/8lg YAGvz8ybD/R6biek6aom2+zV+xF1+a43nygEZjx/iGzlJx9wnetr5D2zk0D8pXroNsId 4zzpY47SNdrjd5Tt1AS2B+kiMOjcHVEvebhu8XevE4Y8OHqhrEGIfPAQNnX6BKBar0Xx jppw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QsUJBlyu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kcjVUAnQVZyDNS+Uh73qpeqZjZDhmLc3x1PgZwU/X7s=; b=Y6wf/Xtb6igrGPuKksq+Ix/V0JOyjOosIgc0d+ND5STdDzEsEBmi949z4NL7/zctyO O7hnyf45lXOpFzN4cM19k/AxXrSjh0xi83S5yRaHO3IYokbqvQ+EoD5S5+5pz65a+vsR j0zOf1gGQMlwgupmBZGncLfI2pmuQy4vQx68YONkrHekg5Cf+WUH5IacnXZqv6tZnU+m dfIeqRSiGgy9xYQweU+ZRi+SSNDOluhzSDTVJvIGiNidviKMFqKb6wiIaYOZSfDkcJU1 y2+LmTZGE5tDQcHimrbJmkMUYp3U5SbmxAPGjy4kxMMVK3U3wCVCjoY5zOJgTEYgTbDI AXUA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kcjVUAnQVZyDNS+Uh73qpeqZjZDhmLc3x1PgZwU/X7s=; b=Mmque1VUdGCebu3oXP7CQV+yM1/8PyJxbbzi255nb1lvgR/66qbdHqW81Z8fRSKX8G VYq1fcIPhMi2vtxNwfignTKhAZ+9A5TJXDvzoAku3YFDLxGoVdshMbdbZRQueH+O54qe /4KrlZPdmjaTZ+T1cRyd63VtLqy9bpKyDYpqMxSBoenxgkTFuhCWR3vuLZDI4zDi4KC/ RFGQmaxgdft+TgB1F9SQ4po37vQaKuu9nHcLIAFAvTFE1hcSsSgSZM4WwY7Fd2+5QeBP DbPIIlGOVnt91yXlvlVAqwevaiUg3OL4pFjRFIX3IcSpSSf0wNGpFiCXbetmy5IyLT0d rQJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=sender:x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-spam-checked-in-group:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=kcjVUAnQVZyDNS+Uh73qpeqZjZDhmLc3x1PgZwU/X7s=; b=XLnksL3pUSJq659Km0CuW2pqAFPYzSjrZ4wk3hfV7A+lMoWUaIn3XL+0HJyIcfiP1m maXJ233/4z3Gmi+7quWfrppv9peoiVVYBX6PdfBMLvnuOpseEsCqe3vv50ZzeYDsaWlH vKhUOfwZBeUD2KT1SJ0aIciBx7AakkvE8lzLvFkr0Hi3MaxhhtA30Zkma0J+YLX64ai7 +3YAV7d2TgKTCRxF162Z2fAh9UFYazxmDlcU+u1f6ot+W4c5oe7KCFapuV5B7/sJJXnq 9ZLApIMUqGdQNFvhlRj6yZdabKKt2dB3kx+cfIOPnYLXzGQgIYFYf9nZCBS/LZw/dKMN CbJw== Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4OY20j7nrPuRFDhYSDZ/JGUcre1xVgBoN21EpgBGk/6y5SNG0a H+ayrDVfy7issURyX6s7+6Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+S+gHyFVIRsvFHSZF5Vw5nL+8uybjW6bDZ/a9U2nYzYzUtfY+PXEFs+4nf68IUDuCAKjLNN1g== X-Received: by 10.46.67.136 with SMTP id z8mr179lje.14.1510088945079; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:05 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.46.20.8 with SMTP id u8ls2357903ljd.9.gmail; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.46.46.11 with SMTP id u11mr5491lju.10.1510088944217; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510088944; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bi7M9dxyugG221GMPu0ZiqmoygAF2IvNkBE2SURF0vmVlgUwGZS9TsLzbvK1aYla4B 3CZhFOdTKm8XB56qOJlke/OJfILEf11DdQlLsGJSDXDr+dVpi5/eUFPctushIidQ22Bf GKHe5A+hc6F/zz/K/DsmXpkxEJ80Ow2SngaA1zHMbYoBIJGr5cr6NBaWIySnJS5YTF4p ezX9wY6RVU78VWMlKk2hGU7RfiFQpNL8LfX/o/pgpCN5Q3ZzGlv/cNS6EwbarF+PJtwk J2b6lXh8IN3GXyZT/HAb1cVVB6On26Q/Wolul5hcAYNbueoRXD5m7NbHBxZyF2JqUo3w XXLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=0fWJ1vebmXtRCCAmzH7HKusLtcC4Vv+eFriu2yvD+XA=; b=wGRkgU3ebydaw/bm3TZI7ut0ir8SLdnrpoY+/knZ4ofvf2aTwd/IIZxN0yUssvGmD3 SQ8S8sCFaH23Eo+FyAlbgb7JxaZe6oA8AIKzN8PtJyM4xzdxpSt2r8gk2BhYlZeIemXU KvJl+EzjreJniNyYApOWdxS9zBz4H5odI666PQjHN+qBj9yfvvHsD9N6cRmoCYZiMxSt 3u2bgDHWzgXNGqrTg4h+45USVmePCyW7r7O1lRYNJeB7Ib8a8ESMqzG6w70Y2ihPaYnq T+aHkouvSgVpO+LSrcsk6axOvoGWElYTsha2o9svebtMlnf+1AUHhiGSqPBqB6JXGKHD gq3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QsUJBlyu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l14si206114lje.1.2017.11.07.13.09.04 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f; Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a2so652651lfh.11 for ; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.46.71.77 with SMTP id u74mr30703lja.79.1510088943598; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:09:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.66.197 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 13:09:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <696697330.4644202.1510075760695@mail.yahoo.com> References: <78156dc5-1fb3-4e9d-992c-a8f30facc4fd@googlegroups.com> <2902921f-abf0-4482-b651-ad78066ec8d5@googlegroups.com> <31152289-ec64-49e4-82c3-bab4ed82cf9a@googlegroups.com> <696697330.4644202.1510075760695@mail.yahoo.com> From: Robert Slaughter Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:09:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban To: lojban@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114126b2100229055d6afbc5" X-Original-Sender: robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QsUJBlyu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robert.s.slaughter@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Spam-Checked-In-Group: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_bar: - --001a114126b2100229055d6afbc5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable PC, the only update to le/lo that I am aware of is 'xorlo', written up here: https://mw.lojban.org/papri/How_to_use_xorlo ---- Bob Slaughter http://www.facebook.com/robert.s.slaughter "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -- Plato "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke "The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." -- Albert Einstein "Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good." -- Pope Leo XIII, encyclical 'On Christians as Citizens' On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:29 PM, 'John E Clifford' via lojban < lojban@googlegroups.com> wrote: > A comment in a recent note suggests that folks have been diddling with > {le} and {lo} yet again (still?). As someone who devoted several pounds = of > paper (virtual, of course) to that issue over the last 40 years, I am > curious to new hat the latest turn is. When last I looked, {le x} was a > term that arbitrarily designed a node with a pragmatic (but not > necessarily semantic ) link to x. {lo x} designated the salient node in > the matrix generated by part-whole on the set of xs. What are the new > wrinkles? > pycyn > > > On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, 10:40:41 AM CST, guskant < > gusni.kantu@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Le mardi 7 novembre 2017 08:49:56 UTC, Benoit Neil a =C3=A9crit : > > doi la .guskant. > > Thanks for the links. That seems interesting, but I just can't read big > Lojban discussions: it took me days (yeah, from time to time, not > continuously!) to read and understand 100% of this famous "la .teris."! > My current level is one of the reasons why I'm absolutely not ready to > enter any board or committee. > > > > BPFK decided in 2015 to talk in Lojban, but LLG meeting is still talked i= n > English. Some of LLG members are not fluent in Lojban. The LLG meeting is > held on a private mailing list, and anyone can attend the meeting by > subscribing to the list: > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-members > You can even request the membership of LLG voting member. > > > > Is there an HTML version somewhere so that everyone can access it without > developer tools? > > > > HTML version of what? > BPFK and LLG are held in mailing list, and Lojban Coders' Group is held o= n > Github. I don't find any other version of meeting minutes. > > > > > ** Paralysis ** > So, according to what you say, BPFK is really paralyzed. When you want to > rely on someone's work, well, (s)he might simply be overloaded with other > tasks and may never answer. It seems that there are no "replacement" > guys/gals: if one is not able to perform a task, whatever the reason, the= n > nobody can replace him/her. Do you think so too? > > > > Yes. > > > > It feels so dramatic to me that you've lost hope. It is exactly what I > feared: anyone can do whatever, in whatever direction. That's freedom. > That's not wrong in itself. But... nothing more? Ideas create "explosions= " > and there is no structure at all to make all of this collapse to somethin= g > better and organized? > > > > I made some critical remarks on the CLL Lojban, and someone agreed, but > finally I did not receive enough reaction for including any ideas of them > into the CLL: > > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/gadri:_an_unofficial_ > commentary_from_a_logical_point_of_view > (written in 2014) > > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/BPFK_Section:_Complement_to_causation_sumtcit= a > (written in 2015) > > https://mw.lojban.org/papri/na_go'i > (written in 2016) > > > > > You told your efforts were blocked by some people. Were there discussions > (I mean enough discussions)? Voting? Enough participants in voting? Enoug= h > time for the committee to work on proposals? > > - If so, maybe there is something to do with structures (as said > above)? > - If not, maybe all committee members should accept the fact that > language will evolve? > > > > > Some of the issues were discussed, I think enough, but not brought to > voting. As for the others, discussion was stopped in midway. I think the > problem is caused by the structure of the committee. > > > > ** Funds ** > As I just told to Gleki : "even if many Lojbanists are enthusiasts, they > all need money to live and cannot work for free indefinitely". > You know, some guy on the Facebook group (=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5= =D0=B9 =D0=98=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B8=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D1=85) asked if > "crypto-currency rewards" could be an idea for translations jobs. At firs= t > I thought this was not very useful, and surely complex to set up. However= , > I feel now that the idea behind this (money to encourage people working o= n > Lojban stuff) may be one of the "energy sources" that would change the > game. Of course, this has to be very carefully handled! But we may imagin= e > something like periodic small fund raising (donations, crowdfunding, etc.= ) > on one hand, and a system putting clear (and small) objectives and reward= s > on the other hand. I feel like the idea has to be enhanced and discussed.= .. > But don't you think it is worth debating on this? This of course would be > only some tools to help, and the current organizations would still be the= re > and help. > > > > At least in the current structure of committees, any ideas about rewards > will be stuck. Rewards should belong to LLG's business, but the LLG meeti= ng > is completely died. My motions for rescuing official contents were always > ignored. They were not even discussed. The main part of the meeting > consists of roll call, voting for the board members, and voting for closi= ng > the meeting. > > > > > ** Organizations ** > An by the way, this thread highlighted the fact that there are 3 "major" > groups down there: LLG, GPFK, and the Coders Group. Even if history may > explain why there are three, the current "freezing" status of all may be = a > signal for changing things. I don't know even 1% of what each did; but *F= ROM > AFAR*, it seems that all organizations share some common interests, and > may perform better together. Of course, merging everyone into a single > entity is surely fictional. But they may organize as "subsidiary > companies", sharing a purely administrative section with some functional > parts (ex: financial as for the previous topic, rule sets, etc.). Do you > feel this would be technically possible? And would this be desirable and > profitable? > > > > I guess those three groups worked like a parent company (LLG) and > subsidiary companies (BPFK, Lojban Coders' Group) in the past. BPFK was > created by LLG in order to complete technical documents. Lojban Coders' > Group was created by voluntary IT engineers, among which there were membe= rs > of LLG or BPFK, maybe for creating various tools for learning Lojban. > > Currently, none of them work fine. LLG is died, BPFK is dying, Lojban > Coders' Group is mixing official and unofficial contents without mentioni= ng > responsibility of the unofficial contents. > > > > > I thought about this overnight (!) and specifically about one rule: as > people discuss about language, is it wise to allow discussions to be in > Lojban only? Maybe a common rule of requiring a (rough?) translation in > another "reference" language would help. Of course, as there are plenty o= f > materials in English out there, it seems logical that this would be > English, but that's not mandatory, I guess. > > You known, I'm willing to help but I can only help organizing stuff, and > spreading the word. Not much more because of my too recent implication. > > > > I have no problem in discussing Lojban in Lojban. Discussion of Lojban in > English continued until 2015, and it also worked fine. I personally profi= t > more from discussion in Lojban as Lojban exercises. I don't know what the > other members of BPFK think about it. > > BPFK is currently dying, so it might be worth trying English discussion a= s > AED. > > > > > ** [side note] ** > Thank you very much for helping me improving my skills. > > - "li .abu pi'e pa" is just a great idea! I didn't know how to convert > the "A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2" levels, so I used a basic "translation". = But > putting as if it was a number "A dot 1" of unspecified base is awesome= ! > - But what about the "less than"? Can I write "me'i li .abu pi'e pa"? > > > > I forgot taking your word {me'a}. It is a function word of part of speech > BAI, and related to {mleca}. {me'a X} means therefore that X is less than > something involved in the meaning of the statement. > > If you wanted to say "less than X" using a function word of BAI, {mau X} > or {se me'a X} would be suitable. > > In my expression, it should be replaced by {me'i} just after {li}: > li me'i .abu pi'e pa > > > > > > - > - My bad about "fo" (and not "fi"): I was counting "fa" from x2 > instead of x1, as for "se" (because there is no "x1 <-> x1" swapping > cmavo), so I had an offset of 1. I mixed up counting rules! > - Note : I thought "me'a..." was a sumti place, but parser told me > it's a modal. So I guess I cannot use it, or else "le ropno bangu b= o manri" > would fall in m3 place (units) of "kamjunmre". > - Finally, your last sentence is too obscure for my level! What I > understand: "One cannot say `I'm never wrong`. I can only wish (???)". > > > > By my last sentence {i na'i ma'i mi na'e toldra i po'o .au sajgau do lo > xauzma be fi mi}, I meant "well, from my point of view, you are not wrong= . > I only want to let you know something better according to me." > > > > ki'ecai > > > > (You may want to insert {do'u}, {i}, {mi'e} or any other words for > separation here, otherwise you are thanking you.) > > > > la .sykyndyr. > > > > mu'o mi'e la guskant > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a114126b2100229055d6afbc5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
PC, the only update to le/lo that I am aware of is 'xo= rlo', written up here:=C2=A0https://mw.lojban.org/papri/How_to_use_xorlo



----
Bob Slaughter
"The price good men pay for indifference to public af= fairs is to be ruled by evil men." -- Plato
"All that i= s necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- E= dmund Burke
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of = those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing." -= - Albert Einstein
"Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly a= s the lack of courage on the part of the good." -- Pope Leo XIII, ency= clical 'On Christians as Citizens'

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:29 PM, 'John E= Clifford' via lojban <lojban@googlegroups.com> wr= ote:
A comment in a recent note suggests that folks have been d= iddling with {le} and {lo} yet again (still?).=C2=A0 As someone who devoted= several pounds of paper (virtual, of course) to that issue over the last 4= 0 years, I am curious to new hat the latest turn is.=C2=A0 When last I look= ed, {le x} was a term =C2=A0that arbitrarily designed a node with a pragmat= ic (but not necessarily semantic ) link to x. =C2=A0{lo x} designated the s= alient node in the matrix generated by part-whole on the set of xs.=C2=A0 W= hat are the new wrinkles?
pycyn
=

=20
=20
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, 10:40:41 AM CST, gusk= ant <gusni.ka= ntu@gmail.com> wrote:




Le mardi 7 novemb= re 2017 08:49:56 UTC, Benoit Neil a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
= doi la .guskant.

Thanks for the lin= ks. That seems interesting, but I just can't read big Lojban discussion= s: it took me days (yeah, from time to time, not continuously!) to read and= understand 100% of this famous "la .teris."!
My curren= t level is one of the reasons why I'm absolutely not ready to enter any= board or committee.

=


BPFK decid= ed in 2015 to talk in Lojban, but LLG meeting is still talked in English. S= ome of LLG members are not fluent in Lojban. The LLG meeting is held on a p= rivate mailing list, and anyone can attend the meeting by subscribing to th= e list:
You can even request the membership of LLG voting memb= er.

=C2=A0
=
Is there an HTML version somewhere so that everyone can acc= ess it without developer tools?



HTML version of what?
BPFK and LLG are held in mailing list, and= Lojban Coders' Group is held on Github. I don't find any other ver= sion of meeting minutes.


=C2=A0
* Paralysis *
So, according to what you say= , BPFK is really paralyzed. When you want to rely on someone's work, we= ll, (s)he might simply be overloaded with other tasks and may never answer.= It seems that there are no "replacement" guys/gals: if one is no= t able to perform a task, whatever the reason, then nobody can replace him/= her. Do you think so too?



Yes.<= /div>

=C2=A0
<= /div>
It feels so dramatic to me that you've lost hope. It is exact= ly what I feared: anyone can do whatever, in whatever direction. That's= freedom. That's not wrong in itself. But... nothing more? Ideas create= "explosions" and there is no structure at all to make all of thi= s collapse to something better and organized?

=


I made some critical remarks on the CLL Lojban, and someone = agreed, but finally I did not receive enough reaction for including any ide= as of them into the CLL:

(written in 2014)

(written in 2015)

(written in 2016)


=C2=A0
You told your ef= forts were blocked by some people. Were there discussions (I mean enough di= scussions)? Voting? Enough participants in voting? Enough time for the comm= ittee to work on proposals?
  • If so, maybe there is somethi= ng to do with structures (as said above)?
  • If not= , maybe all committee members should accept the fact that language will evo= lve?

=


Some of the issues were discussed, I think enough, but not brought to vo= ting. As for the others, discussion was stopped in midway. I think the prob= lem is caused by the structure of the committee.=C2=A0

=C2=A0
* Funds *
As I just told to Gleki : "e= ven if many Lojbanists are enthusiasts, they all need money to live and can= not work for free indefinitely".
You know, some guy on the F= acebook group (=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=98=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0= =B8=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D1=85) asked if "crypto-currency rewards&q= uot; could be an idea for translations jobs. At first I thought this was no= t very useful, and surely complex to set up. However, I feel now that the i= dea behind this (money to encourage people working on Lojban stuff) may be = one of the "energy sources" that would change the game. Of course= , this has to be very carefully handled! But we may imagine something like = periodic small fund raising (donations, crowdfunding, etc.) on one hand, an= d a system putting clear (and small) objectives and rewards on the other ha= nd. I feel like the idea has to be enhanced and discussed... But don't = you think it is worth debating on this? This of course would be only some t= ools to help, and the current organizations would still be there and help.<= /div>



At least in the current structu= re of committees, any ideas about rewards will be stuck. Rewards should bel= ong to LLG's business, but the LLG meeting is completely died. My motio= ns for rescuing official contents were always ignored. They were not even d= iscussed. The main part of the meeting consists of roll call, voting for th= e board members, and voting for closing the meeting.


=C2=A0
* Organizations *
An by the way, this thread highlighted the fact that there are 3 "ma= jor" groups down there: LLG, GPFK, and the Coders Group. Even if histo= ry may explain why there are three, the current "freezing" status= of all may be a signal for changing things. I don't know even 1% of wh= at each did; but FROM AFAR, it seems that all organizations s= hare some common interests, and may perform better together. Of course, mer= ging everyone into a single entity is surely fictional. But they may organi= ze as "subsidiary companies", sharing a purely administrative sec= tion with some functional parts (ex: financial as for the previous topic, r= ule sets, etc.). Do you feel this would be technically possible? And would = this be desirable and profitable?

=


I guess those three groups worked like a parent company (LLG) and subsid= iary companies (BPFK, Lojban Coders' Group) in the past. BPFK was creat= ed by LLG in order to complete technical documents. Lojban Coders' Grou= p was created by voluntary IT engineers, among which there were members of = LLG or BPFK, maybe for creating various tools for learning Lojban.

Currently, none of them work fine. LLG is d= ied, BPFK is dying, Lojban Coders' Group is mixing official and unoffic= ial contents without mentioning responsibility of the unofficial contents.<= /div>


=C2= =A0
I thought about this overnight (!= ) and specifically about one rule: as people discuss about language, is it = wise to allow discussions to be in Lojban only? Maybe a common rule of requ= iring a (rough?) translation in another "reference" language woul= d help. Of course, as there are plenty of materials in English out there, i= t seems logical that this would be English, but that's not mandatory, I= guess.

You known, I'm willing = to help but I can only help organizing stuff, and spreading the word. Not m= uch more because of my too recent implication.



I have no problem in discussing Lojban in Lojban. Discussio= n of Lojban in English continued until 2015, and it also worked fine. I per= sonally profit more from discussion in Lojban as Lojban exercises. I don= 9;t know what the other members of BPFK think about it.

BPFK is currently dying, so it might be worth trying E= nglish discussion as AED.


=C2=A0
* [side note] *
Thank you very much for hel= ping me improving my skills.
  • "li .abu pi'e pa&qu= ot; is just a great idea! I didn't know how to convert the "A1, A2= , B1, B2, C1, C2" levels, so I used a basic "translation". B= ut putting as if it was a number "A dot 1" of unspecified base is= awesome!
  • But what about the "less than&quo= t;? Can I write "me'i li .abu pi'e pa"?


I forgot taking your word {me'a}. It is a fun= ction word of part of speech BAI, and related to {mleca}. {me'a X} mean= s therefore that X is less than something involved in the meaning of the st= atement.

If you wanted to say "= ;less than X" using a function word of BAI, {mau X} or {se me'a X}= would be suitable.

In my expressio= n, it should be replaced by {me'i} just after {li}:
li me'= ;i .abu pi'e pa


=C2=A0
  • My bad ab= out "fo" (and not "fi"): I was counting "fa" = from x2 instead of x1, as for "se" (because there is no "x1 = <-> x1" swapping cmavo), so I had an offset of 1. I mixed up cou= nting rules!
    • Note : I thought "me'a= ..." was a sumti place, but parser told me it's a modal. So I gues= s I cannot use it, or else "le ropno bangu bo manri" would fall i= n m3 place (units) of "kamjunmre".
  • Finally, your las= t sentence is too obscure for my level! What I understand: "One cannot= say `I'm never wrong`. I can only wish (???)".


By my last sentence {i na'i ma'i mi na'e toldr= a i po'o .au sajgau do lo xauzma be fi mi}, I meant "well, from my= point of view, you are not wrong. I only want to let you know something be= tter according to me."

=C2=A0<= /div>
ki'ecai

<= /div>


(You may want to insert {do'u}, {i}, {mi'e} or any other wo= rds for separation here, otherwise you are thanking you.)

=C2=A0
la .syk= yndyr.


mu'o mi'e la guskant
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.= com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.= com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/<= wbr>optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to lojban+unsub= scribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http= s://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a114126b2100229055d6afbc5--